The PLA and Kosovo: A strategy debate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Where the United States saw humanitarian motivations for organizing a NATO coalition force to intervene in Kosovo, the Chinese leadership discerned a dangerous precedent that could be used to oppose Beijing's designs on Taiwan and control of dissident ethnic minority areas. Lengthy discussions ensued within China on how to respond to this provocation. Within the military, different factions of the People's Liberation Army responded mainly in terms of three prior predilections. One group, believers in the efficacy of People's War techniques, maintained that the Yugoslav government's ability to withstand NATO bombing proved the continuing relevance of People's War. A second school, advocates of larger defense budgets and high-tech warfare, argued that only by possessing comparable weapons could the People's Republic of China protect itself against American aggression. The third group cautioned that excessive arms spending could destroy the PRC, much as happened earlier with the Soviet Union. They believed that luring Beijing into an arms race was part of a hegemonist plot against China. Proponents of this group advocated better use of existing weapons, the use of unconventional warfare techniques, and the selective development of "trump card" weapons to exploit enemy weaknesses. The debate among these schools faded from the Chinese press with both the end of the Kosovo conflict and subsequent improvements in the Washington-Beijing dialogue. The underlying issues of this debate remain, however, and are likely to reemerge in the future. Hence a study of Chinese reactions to the Kosovo incursion yields insights of potential importance to future Sino-American relations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-119
Number of pages20
JournalIssues and Studies
Volume36
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Kosovo
weapon
NATO
warfare
China
arms race
provocation
dissident
Group
faction
liberation
school
national minority
aggression
USSR
military
coalition
Taiwan
budget
dialogue

Keywords

  • "China threat"
  • Kosovo
  • Military modernization
  • PLA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

The PLA and Kosovo : A strategy debate. / Dreyer, June Teufel.

In: Issues and Studies, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.2000, p. 100-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{daf0ad0f40e54857b2d7112e0288c87e,
title = "The PLA and Kosovo: A strategy debate",
abstract = "Where the United States saw humanitarian motivations for organizing a NATO coalition force to intervene in Kosovo, the Chinese leadership discerned a dangerous precedent that could be used to oppose Beijing's designs on Taiwan and control of dissident ethnic minority areas. Lengthy discussions ensued within China on how to respond to this provocation. Within the military, different factions of the People's Liberation Army responded mainly in terms of three prior predilections. One group, believers in the efficacy of People's War techniques, maintained that the Yugoslav government's ability to withstand NATO bombing proved the continuing relevance of People's War. A second school, advocates of larger defense budgets and high-tech warfare, argued that only by possessing comparable weapons could the People's Republic of China protect itself against American aggression. The third group cautioned that excessive arms spending could destroy the PRC, much as happened earlier with the Soviet Union. They believed that luring Beijing into an arms race was part of a hegemonist plot against China. Proponents of this group advocated better use of existing weapons, the use of unconventional warfare techniques, and the selective development of {"}trump card{"} weapons to exploit enemy weaknesses. The debate among these schools faded from the Chinese press with both the end of the Kosovo conflict and subsequent improvements in the Washington-Beijing dialogue. The underlying issues of this debate remain, however, and are likely to reemerge in the future. Hence a study of Chinese reactions to the Kosovo incursion yields insights of potential importance to future Sino-American relations.",
keywords = "{"}China threat{"}, Kosovo, Military modernization, PLA",
author = "Dreyer, {June Teufel}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "100--119",
journal = "Issues and Studies",
issn = "1013-2511",
publisher = "Institute of International Relations",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The PLA and Kosovo

T2 - A strategy debate

AU - Dreyer, June Teufel

PY - 2000/1

Y1 - 2000/1

N2 - Where the United States saw humanitarian motivations for organizing a NATO coalition force to intervene in Kosovo, the Chinese leadership discerned a dangerous precedent that could be used to oppose Beijing's designs on Taiwan and control of dissident ethnic minority areas. Lengthy discussions ensued within China on how to respond to this provocation. Within the military, different factions of the People's Liberation Army responded mainly in terms of three prior predilections. One group, believers in the efficacy of People's War techniques, maintained that the Yugoslav government's ability to withstand NATO bombing proved the continuing relevance of People's War. A second school, advocates of larger defense budgets and high-tech warfare, argued that only by possessing comparable weapons could the People's Republic of China protect itself against American aggression. The third group cautioned that excessive arms spending could destroy the PRC, much as happened earlier with the Soviet Union. They believed that luring Beijing into an arms race was part of a hegemonist plot against China. Proponents of this group advocated better use of existing weapons, the use of unconventional warfare techniques, and the selective development of "trump card" weapons to exploit enemy weaknesses. The debate among these schools faded from the Chinese press with both the end of the Kosovo conflict and subsequent improvements in the Washington-Beijing dialogue. The underlying issues of this debate remain, however, and are likely to reemerge in the future. Hence a study of Chinese reactions to the Kosovo incursion yields insights of potential importance to future Sino-American relations.

AB - Where the United States saw humanitarian motivations for organizing a NATO coalition force to intervene in Kosovo, the Chinese leadership discerned a dangerous precedent that could be used to oppose Beijing's designs on Taiwan and control of dissident ethnic minority areas. Lengthy discussions ensued within China on how to respond to this provocation. Within the military, different factions of the People's Liberation Army responded mainly in terms of three prior predilections. One group, believers in the efficacy of People's War techniques, maintained that the Yugoslav government's ability to withstand NATO bombing proved the continuing relevance of People's War. A second school, advocates of larger defense budgets and high-tech warfare, argued that only by possessing comparable weapons could the People's Republic of China protect itself against American aggression. The third group cautioned that excessive arms spending could destroy the PRC, much as happened earlier with the Soviet Union. They believed that luring Beijing into an arms race was part of a hegemonist plot against China. Proponents of this group advocated better use of existing weapons, the use of unconventional warfare techniques, and the selective development of "trump card" weapons to exploit enemy weaknesses. The debate among these schools faded from the Chinese press with both the end of the Kosovo conflict and subsequent improvements in the Washington-Beijing dialogue. The underlying issues of this debate remain, however, and are likely to reemerge in the future. Hence a study of Chinese reactions to the Kosovo incursion yields insights of potential importance to future Sino-American relations.

KW - "China threat"

KW - Kosovo

KW - Military modernization

KW - PLA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0039923086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0039923086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0039923086

VL - 36

SP - 100

EP - 119

JO - Issues and Studies

JF - Issues and Studies

SN - 1013-2511

IS - 1

ER -