TY - JOUR
T1 - The peroneal muscular atrophy syndrome. Clinical, genetic, electrophysiological and nerve biopsy studies. I. Clinical, genetic and electrophysiological findings and classification
AU - Davis, C. J.F.
AU - Bradley, W. G.
AU - Madrid, R.
PY - 1978/12/1
Y1 - 1978/12/1
N2 - A clinical, genetic, electrophysiological and nerve biopsy study of 49 index cases with peroneal muscular atrophy is reported. In dominantly inherited cases, motor conduction velocities of the upper limbs within kinships indicated segregation into five groups which we have termed: a)hypertrophic neuropathy (<25 m/sec); b)intermediate group (25-45 m/sec); c)neuronal sensorimotor neuropathy (>45 m/sec); d)neuronal motor neuropathy (>45 m/sec); e)neuronal motor neuropathy with upper motor neurone involvement (>45 m/sec). The intermediate group is distinguished from the hypertrophic neuropathy group by absence of clinically observed nerve hypertrophy and by the presence of a number of clinical features, including a more rapidly progressive disease. It is concluded to be genetically separate. This group is similarly quite distinct from the neuronal groups. Nerve biopsy studies support this view. There was a relationship between severity of the disease and the conduction velocity which was most evident in the intermediate group. There appeared to be an increase in motor conduction velocity with age in the hypertrophic neuropathy group, while the velocity fell in older patients in the intermediate group. Sensory conduction velocity generally paralleled motor velocity but showed relatively less reduction. Upper motor neurone features were not uncommon, appearing particularly in the intermediate group. Their presence may not therefore be a reliable basis for the classification of cases of peroneal muscular atrophy. Tremor was observed in the hypertrophic, intermediate and neuronal motor neuropathy groups of patients, and does not provide a useful criterion for the classification of peroneal muscular atrophy. There was occasional evidence to suggest poor or abnormal expression of the gene in dominantly inherited cases. Until more specific markers are available sporadic cases should be classified on the basis of the dominant forms, though they show a greater variability.
AB - A clinical, genetic, electrophysiological and nerve biopsy study of 49 index cases with peroneal muscular atrophy is reported. In dominantly inherited cases, motor conduction velocities of the upper limbs within kinships indicated segregation into five groups which we have termed: a)hypertrophic neuropathy (<25 m/sec); b)intermediate group (25-45 m/sec); c)neuronal sensorimotor neuropathy (>45 m/sec); d)neuronal motor neuropathy (>45 m/sec); e)neuronal motor neuropathy with upper motor neurone involvement (>45 m/sec). The intermediate group is distinguished from the hypertrophic neuropathy group by absence of clinically observed nerve hypertrophy and by the presence of a number of clinical features, including a more rapidly progressive disease. It is concluded to be genetically separate. This group is similarly quite distinct from the neuronal groups. Nerve biopsy studies support this view. There was a relationship between severity of the disease and the conduction velocity which was most evident in the intermediate group. There appeared to be an increase in motor conduction velocity with age in the hypertrophic neuropathy group, while the velocity fell in older patients in the intermediate group. Sensory conduction velocity generally paralleled motor velocity but showed relatively less reduction. Upper motor neurone features were not uncommon, appearing particularly in the intermediate group. Their presence may not therefore be a reliable basis for the classification of cases of peroneal muscular atrophy. Tremor was observed in the hypertrophic, intermediate and neuronal motor neuropathy groups of patients, and does not provide a useful criterion for the classification of peroneal muscular atrophy. There was occasional evidence to suggest poor or abnormal expression of the gene in dominantly inherited cases. Until more specific markers are available sporadic cases should be classified on the basis of the dominant forms, though they show a greater variability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018222952&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018222952&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 752065
AN - SCOPUS:0018222952
VL - 26
SP - 311
EP - 349
JO - Journal de Genetique Humaine
JF - Journal de Genetique Humaine
SN - 0021-7743
IS - 4
ER -