The perforated duodenal diverticulum

Chad M. Thorson, Pedro S. Paz Ruiz, Rosiane A. Roeder, Danny Sleeman, Victor Casillas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To perform a literature review of perforated duodenal diverticulum with attention to changes in management. Data Sources: We searched PubMed for relevant studies published from January 1, 1989, through August 1, 2011. In addition, we identified and reviewed 4 cases at our institution. Study Selection: Search phrases were perforated duodenal diverticulum and duodenal diverticulitis. Data Extraction: Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, radiologic findings, treatment, and outcomes were obtained. Results: We reviewed 39 studies producing 57 cases, which were combined with the 4 at our institution for a total of 61 patients. The addition of 2 previous series revealed a total of 162 patients in the world literature. Perforations were most commonly located in the second or third portion of the duodenum (60 of 61 cases [98%]), and the most frequent cause was diverticulitis (42 of 61 [69%]). There has been a dramatic improvement in the preoperative diagnosis of perforated diverticula. Only 13 of 101 reported cases (13%) were correctly diagnosed before 1989, and 29 of 61 (48%) in the present series were identified with radiologic examinations. Most patients in the current series (47 of 61) underwent operative treatment for their perforation, although 14 underwent successful nonoperative management. Complications were reported in 17 of 47 patients in the surgical group (36%), whereas only 1 complication was seen in patients undergoing nonoperative management. Mortality in the surgical group was 6% (3 of 47), and no deaths were reported in the nonoperative group. Conclusions: Perforation of a duodenal diverticulum is rare, with only 162 cases reported in the world literature. Nonoperative management has emerged as a safe, practical alternative to surgery in selected patents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-88
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume147
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Diverticulum
Diverticulitis
Patents
Information Storage and Retrieval
Duodenum
PubMed
Demography
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

The perforated duodenal diverticulum. / Thorson, Chad M.; Paz Ruiz, Pedro S.; Roeder, Rosiane A.; Sleeman, Danny; Casillas, Victor.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 147, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 81-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thorson, Chad M. ; Paz Ruiz, Pedro S. ; Roeder, Rosiane A. ; Sleeman, Danny ; Casillas, Victor. / The perforated duodenal diverticulum. In: Archives of Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 147, No. 1. pp. 81-88.
@article{36f146b944d74a6d8940c8cf955d492e,
title = "The perforated duodenal diverticulum",
abstract = "Objective: To perform a literature review of perforated duodenal diverticulum with attention to changes in management. Data Sources: We searched PubMed for relevant studies published from January 1, 1989, through August 1, 2011. In addition, we identified and reviewed 4 cases at our institution. Study Selection: Search phrases were perforated duodenal diverticulum and duodenal diverticulitis. Data Extraction: Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, radiologic findings, treatment, and outcomes were obtained. Results: We reviewed 39 studies producing 57 cases, which were combined with the 4 at our institution for a total of 61 patients. The addition of 2 previous series revealed a total of 162 patients in the world literature. Perforations were most commonly located in the second or third portion of the duodenum (60 of 61 cases [98{\%}]), and the most frequent cause was diverticulitis (42 of 61 [69{\%}]). There has been a dramatic improvement in the preoperative diagnosis of perforated diverticula. Only 13 of 101 reported cases (13{\%}) were correctly diagnosed before 1989, and 29 of 61 (48{\%}) in the present series were identified with radiologic examinations. Most patients in the current series (47 of 61) underwent operative treatment for their perforation, although 14 underwent successful nonoperative management. Complications were reported in 17 of 47 patients in the surgical group (36{\%}), whereas only 1 complication was seen in patients undergoing nonoperative management. Mortality in the surgical group was 6{\%} (3 of 47), and no deaths were reported in the nonoperative group. Conclusions: Perforation of a duodenal diverticulum is rare, with only 162 cases reported in the world literature. Nonoperative management has emerged as a safe, practical alternative to surgery in selected patents.",
author = "Thorson, {Chad M.} and {Paz Ruiz}, {Pedro S.} and Roeder, {Rosiane A.} and Danny Sleeman and Victor Casillas",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.2011.821",
language = "English",
volume = "147",
pages = "81--88",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The perforated duodenal diverticulum

AU - Thorson, Chad M.

AU - Paz Ruiz, Pedro S.

AU - Roeder, Rosiane A.

AU - Sleeman, Danny

AU - Casillas, Victor

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Objective: To perform a literature review of perforated duodenal diverticulum with attention to changes in management. Data Sources: We searched PubMed for relevant studies published from January 1, 1989, through August 1, 2011. In addition, we identified and reviewed 4 cases at our institution. Study Selection: Search phrases were perforated duodenal diverticulum and duodenal diverticulitis. Data Extraction: Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, radiologic findings, treatment, and outcomes were obtained. Results: We reviewed 39 studies producing 57 cases, which were combined with the 4 at our institution for a total of 61 patients. The addition of 2 previous series revealed a total of 162 patients in the world literature. Perforations were most commonly located in the second or third portion of the duodenum (60 of 61 cases [98%]), and the most frequent cause was diverticulitis (42 of 61 [69%]). There has been a dramatic improvement in the preoperative diagnosis of perforated diverticula. Only 13 of 101 reported cases (13%) were correctly diagnosed before 1989, and 29 of 61 (48%) in the present series were identified with radiologic examinations. Most patients in the current series (47 of 61) underwent operative treatment for their perforation, although 14 underwent successful nonoperative management. Complications were reported in 17 of 47 patients in the surgical group (36%), whereas only 1 complication was seen in patients undergoing nonoperative management. Mortality in the surgical group was 6% (3 of 47), and no deaths were reported in the nonoperative group. Conclusions: Perforation of a duodenal diverticulum is rare, with only 162 cases reported in the world literature. Nonoperative management has emerged as a safe, practical alternative to surgery in selected patents.

AB - Objective: To perform a literature review of perforated duodenal diverticulum with attention to changes in management. Data Sources: We searched PubMed for relevant studies published from January 1, 1989, through August 1, 2011. In addition, we identified and reviewed 4 cases at our institution. Study Selection: Search phrases were perforated duodenal diverticulum and duodenal diverticulitis. Data Extraction: Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, radiologic findings, treatment, and outcomes were obtained. Results: We reviewed 39 studies producing 57 cases, which were combined with the 4 at our institution for a total of 61 patients. The addition of 2 previous series revealed a total of 162 patients in the world literature. Perforations were most commonly located in the second or third portion of the duodenum (60 of 61 cases [98%]), and the most frequent cause was diverticulitis (42 of 61 [69%]). There has been a dramatic improvement in the preoperative diagnosis of perforated diverticula. Only 13 of 101 reported cases (13%) were correctly diagnosed before 1989, and 29 of 61 (48%) in the present series were identified with radiologic examinations. Most patients in the current series (47 of 61) underwent operative treatment for their perforation, although 14 underwent successful nonoperative management. Complications were reported in 17 of 47 patients in the surgical group (36%), whereas only 1 complication was seen in patients undergoing nonoperative management. Mortality in the surgical group was 6% (3 of 47), and no deaths were reported in the nonoperative group. Conclusions: Perforation of a duodenal diverticulum is rare, with only 162 cases reported in the world literature. Nonoperative management has emerged as a safe, practical alternative to surgery in selected patents.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856017782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856017782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.2011.821

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.2011.821

M3 - Article

C2 - 22250120

AN - SCOPUS:84856017782

VL - 147

SP - 81

EP - 88

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 1

ER -