The observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio does not correct for the effect of gestational age on the lung-to-head ratio

Rubén A. Quintero, Eftichia V. Kontopoulos, Luis F. Quintero, David C. Landy, Reinaldo Gonzalez, Ramen H. Chmait

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To assess whether the observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio (o/e LHR) corrects for the dependence of the LHR on gestational age. Study design: Published data on right lung area (LA) and LHR were used to plot the 50th percentile and different fixed values of the o/e LHR (e.g. 30%) against gestational age from 16-32 weeks. The Z-scores for various fixed o/e LHR values and similar percent value of LA were calculated. The effect of using a fixed LHR or a fixed o/e LHR was tested against gestational age. The o/e LHR-equivalent to a fixed LHR of 1.0 was assessed against gestational age. Results: The LHR and the o/e LHR both increase with gestational age. The Z-score of a given fixed value of the o/e LHR (e.g. 30%) is not similar to the Z-score of the same percent (e.g., 30%) of the expected LA, and thus identifies different proportions of subjects. A fixed o/e LHR (e.g. 30%) results in different populations, depending on the gestational age. The o/e LHR equivalent to an LHR value of 1.0 decreases from 80% at 16 weeks to 30% at 32 weeks. Conclusions: The o/e LHR is not independent of gestational age. Studies using this parameter should be interpreted with caution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)552-557
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2013

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Congenital diaphragmatic hernia
  • Lung-to-head ratio
  • Observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this