The observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio does not correct for the effect of gestational age on the lung-to-head ratio

Rubén A. Quintero, Eftichia V. Kontopoulos, Luis F. Quintero, David C. Landy, Reinaldo Gonzalez, Ramen H. Chmait

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To assess whether the observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio (o/e LHR) corrects for the dependence of the LHR on gestational age. Study design: Published data on right lung area (LA) and LHR were used to plot the 50th percentile and different fixed values of the o/e LHR (e.g. 30%) against gestational age from 16-32 weeks. The Z-scores for various fixed o/e LHR values and similar percent value of LA were calculated. The effect of using a fixed LHR or a fixed o/e LHR was tested against gestational age. The o/e LHR-equivalent to a fixed LHR of 1.0 was assessed against gestational age. Results: The LHR and the o/e LHR both increase with gestational age. The Z-score of a given fixed value of the o/e LHR (e.g. 30%) is not similar to the Z-score of the same percent (e.g., 30%) of the expected LA, and thus identifies different proportions of subjects. A fixed o/e LHR (e.g. 30%) results in different populations, depending on the gestational age. The o/e LHR equivalent to an LHR value of 1.0 decreases from 80% at 16 weeks to 30% at 32 weeks. Conclusions: The o/e LHR is not independent of gestational age. Studies using this parameter should be interpreted with caution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)552-557
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume26
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2013

Fingerprint

Gestational Age
Head
Lung
Population

Keywords

  • Congenital diaphragmatic hernia
  • Lung-to-head ratio
  • Observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

The observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio does not correct for the effect of gestational age on the lung-to-head ratio. / Quintero, Rubén A.; Kontopoulos, Eftichia V.; Quintero, Luis F.; Landy, David C.; Gonzalez, Reinaldo; Chmait, Ramen H.

In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 6, 01.04.2013, p. 552-557.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Quintero, Rubén A. ; Kontopoulos, Eftichia V. ; Quintero, Luis F. ; Landy, David C. ; Gonzalez, Reinaldo ; Chmait, Ramen H. / The observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio does not correct for the effect of gestational age on the lung-to-head ratio. In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 552-557.
@article{41bb7d0fef8943de9aef7f6bbeb2c2d8,
title = "The observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio does not correct for the effect of gestational age on the lung-to-head ratio",
abstract = "Objectives: To assess whether the observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio (o/e LHR) corrects for the dependence of the LHR on gestational age. Study design: Published data on right lung area (LA) and LHR were used to plot the 50th percentile and different fixed values of the o/e LHR (e.g. 30{\%}) against gestational age from 16-32 weeks. The Z-scores for various fixed o/e LHR values and similar percent value of LA were calculated. The effect of using a fixed LHR or a fixed o/e LHR was tested against gestational age. The o/e LHR-equivalent to a fixed LHR of 1.0 was assessed against gestational age. Results: The LHR and the o/e LHR both increase with gestational age. The Z-score of a given fixed value of the o/e LHR (e.g. 30{\%}) is not similar to the Z-score of the same percent (e.g., 30{\%}) of the expected LA, and thus identifies different proportions of subjects. A fixed o/e LHR (e.g. 30{\%}) results in different populations, depending on the gestational age. The o/e LHR equivalent to an LHR value of 1.0 decreases from 80{\%} at 16 weeks to 30{\%} at 32 weeks. Conclusions: The o/e LHR is not independent of gestational age. Studies using this parameter should be interpreted with caution.",
keywords = "Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, Lung-to-head ratio, Observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio, Ultrasound",
author = "Quintero, {Rub{\'e}n A.} and Kontopoulos, {Eftichia V.} and Quintero, {Luis F.} and Landy, {David C.} and Reinaldo Gonzalez and Chmait, {Ramen H.}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/14767058.2012.736000",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "552--557",
journal = "Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine",
issn = "1476-7058",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio does not correct for the effect of gestational age on the lung-to-head ratio

AU - Quintero, Rubén A.

AU - Kontopoulos, Eftichia V.

AU - Quintero, Luis F.

AU - Landy, David C.

AU - Gonzalez, Reinaldo

AU - Chmait, Ramen H.

PY - 2013/4/1

Y1 - 2013/4/1

N2 - Objectives: To assess whether the observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio (o/e LHR) corrects for the dependence of the LHR on gestational age. Study design: Published data on right lung area (LA) and LHR were used to plot the 50th percentile and different fixed values of the o/e LHR (e.g. 30%) against gestational age from 16-32 weeks. The Z-scores for various fixed o/e LHR values and similar percent value of LA were calculated. The effect of using a fixed LHR or a fixed o/e LHR was tested against gestational age. The o/e LHR-equivalent to a fixed LHR of 1.0 was assessed against gestational age. Results: The LHR and the o/e LHR both increase with gestational age. The Z-score of a given fixed value of the o/e LHR (e.g. 30%) is not similar to the Z-score of the same percent (e.g., 30%) of the expected LA, and thus identifies different proportions of subjects. A fixed o/e LHR (e.g. 30%) results in different populations, depending on the gestational age. The o/e LHR equivalent to an LHR value of 1.0 decreases from 80% at 16 weeks to 30% at 32 weeks. Conclusions: The o/e LHR is not independent of gestational age. Studies using this parameter should be interpreted with caution.

AB - Objectives: To assess whether the observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio (o/e LHR) corrects for the dependence of the LHR on gestational age. Study design: Published data on right lung area (LA) and LHR were used to plot the 50th percentile and different fixed values of the o/e LHR (e.g. 30%) against gestational age from 16-32 weeks. The Z-scores for various fixed o/e LHR values and similar percent value of LA were calculated. The effect of using a fixed LHR or a fixed o/e LHR was tested against gestational age. The o/e LHR-equivalent to a fixed LHR of 1.0 was assessed against gestational age. Results: The LHR and the o/e LHR both increase with gestational age. The Z-score of a given fixed value of the o/e LHR (e.g. 30%) is not similar to the Z-score of the same percent (e.g., 30%) of the expected LA, and thus identifies different proportions of subjects. A fixed o/e LHR (e.g. 30%) results in different populations, depending on the gestational age. The o/e LHR equivalent to an LHR value of 1.0 decreases from 80% at 16 weeks to 30% at 32 weeks. Conclusions: The o/e LHR is not independent of gestational age. Studies using this parameter should be interpreted with caution.

KW - Congenital diaphragmatic hernia

KW - Lung-to-head ratio

KW - Observed vs. expected lung-to-head ratio

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875404792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875404792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/14767058.2012.736000

DO - 10.3109/14767058.2012.736000

M3 - Article

C2 - 23046345

AN - SCOPUS:84875404792

VL - 26

SP - 552

EP - 557

JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

SN - 1476-7058

IS - 6

ER -