The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy

Results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium

Matthew H. Hayn, Abid Hussain, Ahmed M. Mansour, Paul E. Andrews, Paul Carpentier, Erik Castle, Prokar Dasgupta, Peter Rimington, Raju Thomas, Shamim Khan, Adam Kibel, Hyung Kim, Murugesan Manoharan, Mani Menon, Alex Mottrie, David Ornstein, James Peabody, Raj Pruthi, Joan Palou Redorta, Lee Richstone & 6 others Francis Schanne, Hans Stricker, Peter Wiklund, Rameela Chandrasekhar, Greg E. Wilding, Khurshid A. Guru

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

135 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has evolved as a minimally invasive alternative to open radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer. Objective: We sought to define the learning curve for RARC by evaluating results from a multicenter, contemporary, consecutive series of patients who underwent this procedure. Design, setting, and participants: Utilizing the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium database, a prospectively maintained and institutional review board-approved database, we identified 496 patients who underwent RARC by 21 surgeons at 14 institutions from 2003 to 2009. Measurements: Cut-off points for operative time, lymph node yield (LNY), estimated blood loss (EBL), and margin positivity were identified. Using specifically designed statistical mixed models, we were able to inversely predict the number of patients required for an institution to reach the predetermined cut-off points. Results and limitations: Mean operative time was 386 min, mean EBL was 408 ml, and mean LNY was 18. Overall, 34 of 482 patients (7%) had a positive surgical margin (PSM). Using statistical models, it was estimated that 21 patients were required for operative time to reach 6.5 h and 8, 20, and 30 patients were required to reach an LNY of 12, 16, and 20, respectively. For all patients, PSM rates of <5% were achieved after 30 patients. For patients with pathologic stage higher than T2, PSM rates of <15% were achieved after 24 patients. Conclusions: RARC is a challenging procedure but is a technique that is reproducible throughout multiple centers. This report helps to define the learning curve for RARC and demonstrates an acceptable level of proficiency by the 30th case for proxy measures of RARC quality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-202
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2010

Fingerprint

Learning Curve
Cystectomy
Robotics
Operative Time
Lymph Nodes
Statistical Models
Databases
Research Ethics Committees
Proxy
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Cystectomy
  • Lymph node excision
  • Minimally invasive
  • Reference standards
  • Robot-assisted
  • Surgical procedures
  • Urinary bladder neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Hayn, M. H., Hussain, A., Mansour, A. M., Andrews, P. E., Carpentier, P., Castle, E., ... Guru, K. A. (2010). The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium. European Urology, 58(2), 197-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.024

The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy : Results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium. / Hayn, Matthew H.; Hussain, Abid; Mansour, Ahmed M.; Andrews, Paul E.; Carpentier, Paul; Castle, Erik; Dasgupta, Prokar; Rimington, Peter; Thomas, Raju; Khan, Shamim; Kibel, Adam; Kim, Hyung; Manoharan, Murugesan; Menon, Mani; Mottrie, Alex; Ornstein, David; Peabody, James; Pruthi, Raj; Palou Redorta, Joan; Richstone, Lee; Schanne, Francis; Stricker, Hans; Wiklund, Peter; Chandrasekhar, Rameela; Wilding, Greg E.; Guru, Khurshid A.

In: European Urology, Vol. 58, No. 2, 01.08.2010, p. 197-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hayn, MH, Hussain, A, Mansour, AM, Andrews, PE, Carpentier, P, Castle, E, Dasgupta, P, Rimington, P, Thomas, R, Khan, S, Kibel, A, Kim, H, Manoharan, M, Menon, M, Mottrie, A, Ornstein, D, Peabody, J, Pruthi, R, Palou Redorta, J, Richstone, L, Schanne, F, Stricker, H, Wiklund, P, Chandrasekhar, R, Wilding, GE & Guru, KA 2010, 'The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium', European Urology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 197-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.024
Hayn, Matthew H. ; Hussain, Abid ; Mansour, Ahmed M. ; Andrews, Paul E. ; Carpentier, Paul ; Castle, Erik ; Dasgupta, Prokar ; Rimington, Peter ; Thomas, Raju ; Khan, Shamim ; Kibel, Adam ; Kim, Hyung ; Manoharan, Murugesan ; Menon, Mani ; Mottrie, Alex ; Ornstein, David ; Peabody, James ; Pruthi, Raj ; Palou Redorta, Joan ; Richstone, Lee ; Schanne, Francis ; Stricker, Hans ; Wiklund, Peter ; Chandrasekhar, Rameela ; Wilding, Greg E. ; Guru, Khurshid A. / The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy : Results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium. In: European Urology. 2010 ; Vol. 58, No. 2. pp. 197-202.
@article{282120dd17114609b11b8f463405b885,
title = "The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium",
abstract = "Background: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has evolved as a minimally invasive alternative to open radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer. Objective: We sought to define the learning curve for RARC by evaluating results from a multicenter, contemporary, consecutive series of patients who underwent this procedure. Design, setting, and participants: Utilizing the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium database, a prospectively maintained and institutional review board-approved database, we identified 496 patients who underwent RARC by 21 surgeons at 14 institutions from 2003 to 2009. Measurements: Cut-off points for operative time, lymph node yield (LNY), estimated blood loss (EBL), and margin positivity were identified. Using specifically designed statistical mixed models, we were able to inversely predict the number of patients required for an institution to reach the predetermined cut-off points. Results and limitations: Mean operative time was 386 min, mean EBL was 408 ml, and mean LNY was 18. Overall, 34 of 482 patients (7{\%}) had a positive surgical margin (PSM). Using statistical models, it was estimated that 21 patients were required for operative time to reach 6.5 h and 8, 20, and 30 patients were required to reach an LNY of 12, 16, and 20, respectively. For all patients, PSM rates of <5{\%} were achieved after 30 patients. For patients with pathologic stage higher than T2, PSM rates of <15{\%} were achieved after 24 patients. Conclusions: RARC is a challenging procedure but is a technique that is reproducible throughout multiple centers. This report helps to define the learning curve for RARC and demonstrates an acceptable level of proficiency by the 30th case for proxy measures of RARC quality.",
keywords = "Cystectomy, Lymph node excision, Minimally invasive, Reference standards, Robot-assisted, Surgical procedures, Urinary bladder neoplasms",
author = "Hayn, {Matthew H.} and Abid Hussain and Mansour, {Ahmed M.} and Andrews, {Paul E.} and Paul Carpentier and Erik Castle and Prokar Dasgupta and Peter Rimington and Raju Thomas and Shamim Khan and Adam Kibel and Hyung Kim and Murugesan Manoharan and Mani Menon and Alex Mottrie and David Ornstein and James Peabody and Raj Pruthi and {Palou Redorta}, Joan and Lee Richstone and Francis Schanne and Hans Stricker and Peter Wiklund and Rameela Chandrasekhar and Wilding, {Greg E.} and Guru, {Khurshid A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.024",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "197--202",
journal = "European Urology",
issn = "0302-2838",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy

T2 - Results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium

AU - Hayn, Matthew H.

AU - Hussain, Abid

AU - Mansour, Ahmed M.

AU - Andrews, Paul E.

AU - Carpentier, Paul

AU - Castle, Erik

AU - Dasgupta, Prokar

AU - Rimington, Peter

AU - Thomas, Raju

AU - Khan, Shamim

AU - Kibel, Adam

AU - Kim, Hyung

AU - Manoharan, Murugesan

AU - Menon, Mani

AU - Mottrie, Alex

AU - Ornstein, David

AU - Peabody, James

AU - Pruthi, Raj

AU - Palou Redorta, Joan

AU - Richstone, Lee

AU - Schanne, Francis

AU - Stricker, Hans

AU - Wiklund, Peter

AU - Chandrasekhar, Rameela

AU - Wilding, Greg E.

AU - Guru, Khurshid A.

PY - 2010/8/1

Y1 - 2010/8/1

N2 - Background: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has evolved as a minimally invasive alternative to open radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer. Objective: We sought to define the learning curve for RARC by evaluating results from a multicenter, contemporary, consecutive series of patients who underwent this procedure. Design, setting, and participants: Utilizing the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium database, a prospectively maintained and institutional review board-approved database, we identified 496 patients who underwent RARC by 21 surgeons at 14 institutions from 2003 to 2009. Measurements: Cut-off points for operative time, lymph node yield (LNY), estimated blood loss (EBL), and margin positivity were identified. Using specifically designed statistical mixed models, we were able to inversely predict the number of patients required for an institution to reach the predetermined cut-off points. Results and limitations: Mean operative time was 386 min, mean EBL was 408 ml, and mean LNY was 18. Overall, 34 of 482 patients (7%) had a positive surgical margin (PSM). Using statistical models, it was estimated that 21 patients were required for operative time to reach 6.5 h and 8, 20, and 30 patients were required to reach an LNY of 12, 16, and 20, respectively. For all patients, PSM rates of <5% were achieved after 30 patients. For patients with pathologic stage higher than T2, PSM rates of <15% were achieved after 24 patients. Conclusions: RARC is a challenging procedure but is a technique that is reproducible throughout multiple centers. This report helps to define the learning curve for RARC and demonstrates an acceptable level of proficiency by the 30th case for proxy measures of RARC quality.

AB - Background: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has evolved as a minimally invasive alternative to open radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer. Objective: We sought to define the learning curve for RARC by evaluating results from a multicenter, contemporary, consecutive series of patients who underwent this procedure. Design, setting, and participants: Utilizing the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium database, a prospectively maintained and institutional review board-approved database, we identified 496 patients who underwent RARC by 21 surgeons at 14 institutions from 2003 to 2009. Measurements: Cut-off points for operative time, lymph node yield (LNY), estimated blood loss (EBL), and margin positivity were identified. Using specifically designed statistical mixed models, we were able to inversely predict the number of patients required for an institution to reach the predetermined cut-off points. Results and limitations: Mean operative time was 386 min, mean EBL was 408 ml, and mean LNY was 18. Overall, 34 of 482 patients (7%) had a positive surgical margin (PSM). Using statistical models, it was estimated that 21 patients were required for operative time to reach 6.5 h and 8, 20, and 30 patients were required to reach an LNY of 12, 16, and 20, respectively. For all patients, PSM rates of <5% were achieved after 30 patients. For patients with pathologic stage higher than T2, PSM rates of <15% were achieved after 24 patients. Conclusions: RARC is a challenging procedure but is a technique that is reproducible throughout multiple centers. This report helps to define the learning curve for RARC and demonstrates an acceptable level of proficiency by the 30th case for proxy measures of RARC quality.

KW - Cystectomy

KW - Lymph node excision

KW - Minimally invasive

KW - Reference standards

KW - Robot-assisted

KW - Surgical procedures

KW - Urinary bladder neoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955305939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955305939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.024

DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.024

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 197

EP - 202

JO - European Urology

JF - European Urology

SN - 0302-2838

IS - 2

ER -