The influence of discordance in pain assessment on the functional status of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain

Mukta Panda, Lisa J. Staton, Ian Chen, James Kurz, Jane O'Rorke, Mark Pasanen, Madhusudan Menon, Inginia Genao, Joann Wood, Alex Mechaber, Eric Rosenberg, Charles Faselis, Tim Carey, Diane Calleson, Sam Cykert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: Chronic pain is a frequent cause of suffering and disability that seriously affects patients' quality of life and imposes a staggering socioeconomic toll on society. Little is known about the impact of patient-physician disagreement (discordance) regarding the assessment of chronic pain on patients' quality of life in primary care settings. This study evaluates the role of discordance and other potentially modifiable factors that affect the quality of life and functional status of chronic pain patients. METHODS:: We evaluated 436 patient-physician encounters at 12 academic medical centers in the United States. We surveyed chronic nonmalignant pain patients to understand their pain perceptions. We concurrently surveyed their physicians about their perceptions of their patient's pain in primary care settings. RESULTS:: More than 50% of physicians disagreed with their patient's pain. Thirty-nine percent of primary care physicians underestimated their patient's pain. In the multivariate analysis, this discordance was associated with poor physical functioning and worse bodily pain (P < 0.018 and P < 0.001 respectively). Patients with chronic, nonmalignant pain have reductions in physical function and bodily pain domains of the SF-36 compared to age-matched populations. Depression and obesity represented other associations. CONCLUSION:: Patients with chronic nonmalignant pain have poor physical functioning and worse bodily pain. Discordance, obesity, and depression are other modifiable factors. Prospective studies are needed to design interventions. However, a multifaceted approach appears to represent the best opportunity to reduce the pain and suffering of this challenging population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)18-23
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of the Medical Sciences
Volume332
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2006

Keywords

  • Chronic nonmalignant pain
  • Functional status
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Pain assessment scales
  • Primary care
  • SF-36 health survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The influence of discordance in pain assessment on the functional status of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Panda, M., Staton, L. J., Chen, I., Kurz, J., O'Rorke, J., Pasanen, M., Menon, M., Genao, I., Wood, J., Mechaber, A., Rosenberg, E., Faselis, C., Carey, T., Calleson, D., & Cykert, S. (2006). The influence of discordance in pain assessment on the functional status of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 332(1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-200607000-00004