The influence of discordance in pain assessment on the functional status of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain

Mukta Panda, Lisa J. Staton, Ian Chen, James Kurz, Jane O'Rorke, Mark Pasanen, Madhusudan Menon, Inginia Genao, Joann Wood, Alex Mechaber, Eric Rosenberg, Charles Faselis, Tim Carey, Diane Calleson, Sam Cykert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: Chronic pain is a frequent cause of suffering and disability that seriously affects patients' quality of life and imposes a staggering socioeconomic toll on society. Little is known about the impact of patient-physician disagreement (discordance) regarding the assessment of chronic pain on patients' quality of life in primary care settings. This study evaluates the role of discordance and other potentially modifiable factors that affect the quality of life and functional status of chronic pain patients. METHODS:: We evaluated 436 patient-physician encounters at 12 academic medical centers in the United States. We surveyed chronic nonmalignant pain patients to understand their pain perceptions. We concurrently surveyed their physicians about their perceptions of their patient's pain in primary care settings. RESULTS:: More than 50% of physicians disagreed with their patient's pain. Thirty-nine percent of primary care physicians underestimated their patient's pain. In the multivariate analysis, this discordance was associated with poor physical functioning and worse bodily pain (P < 0.018 and P < 0.001 respectively). Patients with chronic, nonmalignant pain have reductions in physical function and bodily pain domains of the SF-36 compared to age-matched populations. Depression and obesity represented other associations. CONCLUSION:: Patients with chronic nonmalignant pain have poor physical functioning and worse bodily pain. Discordance, obesity, and depression are other modifiable factors. Prospective studies are needed to design interventions. However, a multifaceted approach appears to represent the best opportunity to reduce the pain and suffering of this challenging population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-23
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of the Medical Sciences
Volume332
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2006

Fingerprint

Pain Measurement
Chronic Pain
Pain
Physicians
Quality of Life
Primary Health Care
Obesity
Depression
Pain Perception
Primary Care Physicians
Psychological Stress
Population
Multivariate Analysis
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Chronic nonmalignant pain
  • Functional status
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Pain assessment scales
  • Primary care
  • SF-36 health survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The influence of discordance in pain assessment on the functional status of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. / Panda, Mukta; Staton, Lisa J.; Chen, Ian; Kurz, James; O'Rorke, Jane; Pasanen, Mark; Menon, Madhusudan; Genao, Inginia; Wood, Joann; Mechaber, Alex; Rosenberg, Eric; Faselis, Charles; Carey, Tim; Calleson, Diane; Cykert, Sam.

In: American Journal of the Medical Sciences, Vol. 332, No. 1, 01.07.2006, p. 18-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Panda, M, Staton, LJ, Chen, I, Kurz, J, O'Rorke, J, Pasanen, M, Menon, M, Genao, I, Wood, J, Mechaber, A, Rosenberg, E, Faselis, C, Carey, T, Calleson, D & Cykert, S 2006, 'The influence of discordance in pain assessment on the functional status of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain', American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 332, no. 1, pp. 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-200607000-00004
Panda, Mukta ; Staton, Lisa J. ; Chen, Ian ; Kurz, James ; O'Rorke, Jane ; Pasanen, Mark ; Menon, Madhusudan ; Genao, Inginia ; Wood, Joann ; Mechaber, Alex ; Rosenberg, Eric ; Faselis, Charles ; Carey, Tim ; Calleson, Diane ; Cykert, Sam. / The influence of discordance in pain assessment on the functional status of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. In: American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 2006 ; Vol. 332, No. 1. pp. 18-23.
@article{f09a3f29eb4646c9ae63665187112bd0,
title = "The influence of discordance in pain assessment on the functional status of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain",
abstract = "BACKGROUND:: Chronic pain is a frequent cause of suffering and disability that seriously affects patients' quality of life and imposes a staggering socioeconomic toll on society. Little is known about the impact of patient-physician disagreement (discordance) regarding the assessment of chronic pain on patients' quality of life in primary care settings. This study evaluates the role of discordance and other potentially modifiable factors that affect the quality of life and functional status of chronic pain patients. METHODS:: We evaluated 436 patient-physician encounters at 12 academic medical centers in the United States. We surveyed chronic nonmalignant pain patients to understand their pain perceptions. We concurrently surveyed their physicians about their perceptions of their patient's pain in primary care settings. RESULTS:: More than 50{\%} of physicians disagreed with their patient's pain. Thirty-nine percent of primary care physicians underestimated their patient's pain. In the multivariate analysis, this discordance was associated with poor physical functioning and worse bodily pain (P < 0.018 and P < 0.001 respectively). Patients with chronic, nonmalignant pain have reductions in physical function and bodily pain domains of the SF-36 compared to age-matched populations. Depression and obesity represented other associations. CONCLUSION:: Patients with chronic nonmalignant pain have poor physical functioning and worse bodily pain. Discordance, obesity, and depression are other modifiable factors. Prospective studies are needed to design interventions. However, a multifaceted approach appears to represent the best opportunity to reduce the pain and suffering of this challenging population.",
keywords = "Chronic nonmalignant pain, Functional status, Health-related quality of life, Pain assessment scales, Primary care, SF-36 health survey",
author = "Mukta Panda and Staton, {Lisa J.} and Ian Chen and James Kurz and Jane O'Rorke and Mark Pasanen and Madhusudan Menon and Inginia Genao and Joann Wood and Alex Mechaber and Eric Rosenberg and Charles Faselis and Tim Carey and Diane Calleson and Sam Cykert",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00000441-200607000-00004",
language = "English",
volume = "332",
pages = "18--23",
journal = "American Journal of the Medical Sciences",
issn = "0002-9629",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of discordance in pain assessment on the functional status of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain

AU - Panda, Mukta

AU - Staton, Lisa J.

AU - Chen, Ian

AU - Kurz, James

AU - O'Rorke, Jane

AU - Pasanen, Mark

AU - Menon, Madhusudan

AU - Genao, Inginia

AU - Wood, Joann

AU - Mechaber, Alex

AU - Rosenberg, Eric

AU - Faselis, Charles

AU - Carey, Tim

AU - Calleson, Diane

AU - Cykert, Sam

PY - 2006/7/1

Y1 - 2006/7/1

N2 - BACKGROUND:: Chronic pain is a frequent cause of suffering and disability that seriously affects patients' quality of life and imposes a staggering socioeconomic toll on society. Little is known about the impact of patient-physician disagreement (discordance) regarding the assessment of chronic pain on patients' quality of life in primary care settings. This study evaluates the role of discordance and other potentially modifiable factors that affect the quality of life and functional status of chronic pain patients. METHODS:: We evaluated 436 patient-physician encounters at 12 academic medical centers in the United States. We surveyed chronic nonmalignant pain patients to understand their pain perceptions. We concurrently surveyed their physicians about their perceptions of their patient's pain in primary care settings. RESULTS:: More than 50% of physicians disagreed with their patient's pain. Thirty-nine percent of primary care physicians underestimated their patient's pain. In the multivariate analysis, this discordance was associated with poor physical functioning and worse bodily pain (P < 0.018 and P < 0.001 respectively). Patients with chronic, nonmalignant pain have reductions in physical function and bodily pain domains of the SF-36 compared to age-matched populations. Depression and obesity represented other associations. CONCLUSION:: Patients with chronic nonmalignant pain have poor physical functioning and worse bodily pain. Discordance, obesity, and depression are other modifiable factors. Prospective studies are needed to design interventions. However, a multifaceted approach appears to represent the best opportunity to reduce the pain and suffering of this challenging population.

AB - BACKGROUND:: Chronic pain is a frequent cause of suffering and disability that seriously affects patients' quality of life and imposes a staggering socioeconomic toll on society. Little is known about the impact of patient-physician disagreement (discordance) regarding the assessment of chronic pain on patients' quality of life in primary care settings. This study evaluates the role of discordance and other potentially modifiable factors that affect the quality of life and functional status of chronic pain patients. METHODS:: We evaluated 436 patient-physician encounters at 12 academic medical centers in the United States. We surveyed chronic nonmalignant pain patients to understand their pain perceptions. We concurrently surveyed their physicians about their perceptions of their patient's pain in primary care settings. RESULTS:: More than 50% of physicians disagreed with their patient's pain. Thirty-nine percent of primary care physicians underestimated their patient's pain. In the multivariate analysis, this discordance was associated with poor physical functioning and worse bodily pain (P < 0.018 and P < 0.001 respectively). Patients with chronic, nonmalignant pain have reductions in physical function and bodily pain domains of the SF-36 compared to age-matched populations. Depression and obesity represented other associations. CONCLUSION:: Patients with chronic nonmalignant pain have poor physical functioning and worse bodily pain. Discordance, obesity, and depression are other modifiable factors. Prospective studies are needed to design interventions. However, a multifaceted approach appears to represent the best opportunity to reduce the pain and suffering of this challenging population.

KW - Chronic nonmalignant pain

KW - Functional status

KW - Health-related quality of life

KW - Pain assessment scales

KW - Primary care

KW - SF-36 health survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746141614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746141614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000441-200607000-00004

DO - 10.1097/00000441-200607000-00004

M3 - Article

C2 - 16845237

AN - SCOPUS:33746141614

VL - 332

SP - 18

EP - 23

JO - American Journal of the Medical Sciences

JF - American Journal of the Medical Sciences

SN - 0002-9629

IS - 1

ER -