The future of systems therapy: Shedding myths and facing opportunities

J. C. Coyne, Howard A Liddle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Systems therapy is moving toward paradigmatic parity with more conventional approaches to psychotherapy. Systems therapists are faced with expanding opportunities but need to shed old myths, temper past claims, and develop a stronger role for research in the approach's legitimation. Within systems therapy, there has been a breakdown of schoolism and movement toward technical eclecticism and theoretical integration. The growing contact between systems therapy and the larger movement toward psychotherapy integration could have any of three results: harmony at any price, mutual repulsion, or an extended dialogue, the outcome of which cannot be assured. Systems therapy researchers have much to gain from conventional psychotherapy research and in turn can offer a perspective on the process of change in the context of close relationships. Some contrary evidence and trends counter to the future direction that we propose for systems therapy are noted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-50
Number of pages7
JournalPsychotherapy
Volume29
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychotherapy
Therapeutics
Parity
Research
Research Personnel
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The future of systems therapy : Shedding myths and facing opportunities. / Coyne, J. C.; Liddle, Howard A.

In: Psychotherapy, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.1992, p. 44-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c69c145199df42f39efa9f05b2260b31,
title = "The future of systems therapy: Shedding myths and facing opportunities",
abstract = "Systems therapy is moving toward paradigmatic parity with more conventional approaches to psychotherapy. Systems therapists are faced with expanding opportunities but need to shed old myths, temper past claims, and develop a stronger role for research in the approach's legitimation. Within systems therapy, there has been a breakdown of schoolism and movement toward technical eclecticism and theoretical integration. The growing contact between systems therapy and the larger movement toward psychotherapy integration could have any of three results: harmony at any price, mutual repulsion, or an extended dialogue, the outcome of which cannot be assured. Systems therapy researchers have much to gain from conventional psychotherapy research and in turn can offer a perspective on the process of change in the context of close relationships. Some contrary evidence and trends counter to the future direction that we propose for systems therapy are noted.",
author = "Coyne, {J. C.} and Liddle, {Howard A}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "44--50",
journal = "Psychotherapy",
issn = "0033-3204",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The future of systems therapy

T2 - Shedding myths and facing opportunities

AU - Coyne, J. C.

AU - Liddle, Howard A

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - Systems therapy is moving toward paradigmatic parity with more conventional approaches to psychotherapy. Systems therapists are faced with expanding opportunities but need to shed old myths, temper past claims, and develop a stronger role for research in the approach's legitimation. Within systems therapy, there has been a breakdown of schoolism and movement toward technical eclecticism and theoretical integration. The growing contact between systems therapy and the larger movement toward psychotherapy integration could have any of three results: harmony at any price, mutual repulsion, or an extended dialogue, the outcome of which cannot be assured. Systems therapy researchers have much to gain from conventional psychotherapy research and in turn can offer a perspective on the process of change in the context of close relationships. Some contrary evidence and trends counter to the future direction that we propose for systems therapy are noted.

AB - Systems therapy is moving toward paradigmatic parity with more conventional approaches to psychotherapy. Systems therapists are faced with expanding opportunities but need to shed old myths, temper past claims, and develop a stronger role for research in the approach's legitimation. Within systems therapy, there has been a breakdown of schoolism and movement toward technical eclecticism and theoretical integration. The growing contact between systems therapy and the larger movement toward psychotherapy integration could have any of three results: harmony at any price, mutual repulsion, or an extended dialogue, the outcome of which cannot be assured. Systems therapy researchers have much to gain from conventional psychotherapy research and in turn can offer a perspective on the process of change in the context of close relationships. Some contrary evidence and trends counter to the future direction that we propose for systems therapy are noted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026535605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026535605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026535605

VL - 29

SP - 44

EP - 50

JO - Psychotherapy

JF - Psychotherapy

SN - 0033-3204

IS - 1

ER -