The first amendment right against compelled listening

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This Article argues for a new First Amendment right: the right against compelled listening. Free speech jurisprudence - which already recognizes the right to speak, the right to listen, and the right against compelled speech - is incomplete without the right against compelled listening. The same values that underlie the other free speech rights also lead to this right. Furthermore, this claim holds true regardless of whether one conceives of the primary purpose of the Free Speech Clause as creating a marketplace of ideas, enhancing participatory democracy, or promoting individual autonomy. The Article starts by examining the protection afforded to unwilling listeners by the captive audience doctrine, which balances private speakers' right to communicate against listeners' rights to privacy, equality, and voting. It then argues that protection for captive listeners can be grounded in free speech values, and explores two possible approaches to delimiting the free speech right against compelled listening. The Article concludes by applying the new right to state-mandated abortion counseling and state-mandated diversity training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)939-1016
Number of pages78
JournalBoston University Law Review
Volume89
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009

Fingerprint

amendment
listener
abortion counseling
right to speak
The New Right
right to privacy
jurisprudence
doctrine
voting
Values
equality
autonomy
democracy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

The first amendment right against compelled listening. / Corbin, Caroline.

In: Boston University Law Review, Vol. 89, No. 3, 01.06.2009, p. 939-1016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4f4193d637d144e6899497610a343fb9,
title = "The first amendment right against compelled listening",
abstract = "This Article argues for a new First Amendment right: the right against compelled listening. Free speech jurisprudence - which already recognizes the right to speak, the right to listen, and the right against compelled speech - is incomplete without the right against compelled listening. The same values that underlie the other free speech rights also lead to this right. Furthermore, this claim holds true regardless of whether one conceives of the primary purpose of the Free Speech Clause as creating a marketplace of ideas, enhancing participatory democracy, or promoting individual autonomy. The Article starts by examining the protection afforded to unwilling listeners by the captive audience doctrine, which balances private speakers' right to communicate against listeners' rights to privacy, equality, and voting. It then argues that protection for captive listeners can be grounded in free speech values, and explores two possible approaches to delimiting the free speech right against compelled listening. The Article concludes by applying the new right to state-mandated abortion counseling and state-mandated diversity training.",
author = "Caroline Corbin",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "939--1016",
journal = "Boston University Law Review",
issn = "0006-8047",
publisher = "Boston University, School of Law",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The first amendment right against compelled listening

AU - Corbin, Caroline

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - This Article argues for a new First Amendment right: the right against compelled listening. Free speech jurisprudence - which already recognizes the right to speak, the right to listen, and the right against compelled speech - is incomplete without the right against compelled listening. The same values that underlie the other free speech rights also lead to this right. Furthermore, this claim holds true regardless of whether one conceives of the primary purpose of the Free Speech Clause as creating a marketplace of ideas, enhancing participatory democracy, or promoting individual autonomy. The Article starts by examining the protection afforded to unwilling listeners by the captive audience doctrine, which balances private speakers' right to communicate against listeners' rights to privacy, equality, and voting. It then argues that protection for captive listeners can be grounded in free speech values, and explores two possible approaches to delimiting the free speech right against compelled listening. The Article concludes by applying the new right to state-mandated abortion counseling and state-mandated diversity training.

AB - This Article argues for a new First Amendment right: the right against compelled listening. Free speech jurisprudence - which already recognizes the right to speak, the right to listen, and the right against compelled speech - is incomplete without the right against compelled listening. The same values that underlie the other free speech rights also lead to this right. Furthermore, this claim holds true regardless of whether one conceives of the primary purpose of the Free Speech Clause as creating a marketplace of ideas, enhancing participatory democracy, or promoting individual autonomy. The Article starts by examining the protection afforded to unwilling listeners by the captive audience doctrine, which balances private speakers' right to communicate against listeners' rights to privacy, equality, and voting. It then argues that protection for captive listeners can be grounded in free speech values, and explores two possible approaches to delimiting the free speech right against compelled listening. The Article concludes by applying the new right to state-mandated abortion counseling and state-mandated diversity training.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68249097575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68249097575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:68249097575

VL - 89

SP - 939

EP - 1016

JO - Boston University Law Review

JF - Boston University Law Review

SN - 0006-8047

IS - 3

ER -