The Epistemology of Fact Checking

Joseph Uscinski, Ryden W. Butler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fact checking has become a prominent facet of political news coverage, but it employs a variety of objectionable methodological practices, such as treating a statement containing multiple facts as if it were a single fact and categorizing as accurate or inaccurate predictions of events yet to occur. These practices share the tacit presupposition that there cannot be genuine political debate about facts, because facts are unambiguous and not subject to interpretation. Therefore, when the black-and-white facts-as they appear to the fact checkers-conflict with the claims produced by politicians, the fact checkers are able to see only (to one degree or another) "lies." The examples of dubious fact-checking practices that we discuss show the untenability of the naïve political epistemology at work in the fact-checking branch of journalism. They may also call into question the same epistemology in journalism at large, and in politics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)162-180
Number of pages19
JournalCritical Review
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

epistemology
journalism
politician
news
coverage
interpretation
politics
event
Epistemology
Journalism
Prediction
Nave
Political Debate
Politicians
Presupposition
Political News

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

The Epistemology of Fact Checking. / Uscinski, Joseph; Butler, Ryden W.

In: Critical Review, Vol. 25, No. 2, 06.2013, p. 162-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Uscinski, Joseph ; Butler, Ryden W. / The Epistemology of Fact Checking. In: Critical Review. 2013 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 162-180.
@article{4158afa7f7ca457b8c1ceb6dfb0214ab,
title = "The Epistemology of Fact Checking",
abstract = "Fact checking has become a prominent facet of political news coverage, but it employs a variety of objectionable methodological practices, such as treating a statement containing multiple facts as if it were a single fact and categorizing as accurate or inaccurate predictions of events yet to occur. These practices share the tacit presupposition that there cannot be genuine political debate about facts, because facts are unambiguous and not subject to interpretation. Therefore, when the black-and-white facts-as they appear to the fact checkers-conflict with the claims produced by politicians, the fact checkers are able to see only (to one degree or another) {"}lies.{"} The examples of dubious fact-checking practices that we discuss show the untenability of the na{\"i}ve political epistemology at work in the fact-checking branch of journalism. They may also call into question the same epistemology in journalism at large, and in politics.",
author = "Joseph Uscinski and Butler, {Ryden W.}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/08913811.2013.843872",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "162--180",
journal = "Critical Review",
issn = "0891-3811",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Epistemology of Fact Checking

AU - Uscinski, Joseph

AU - Butler, Ryden W.

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Fact checking has become a prominent facet of political news coverage, but it employs a variety of objectionable methodological practices, such as treating a statement containing multiple facts as if it were a single fact and categorizing as accurate or inaccurate predictions of events yet to occur. These practices share the tacit presupposition that there cannot be genuine political debate about facts, because facts are unambiguous and not subject to interpretation. Therefore, when the black-and-white facts-as they appear to the fact checkers-conflict with the claims produced by politicians, the fact checkers are able to see only (to one degree or another) "lies." The examples of dubious fact-checking practices that we discuss show the untenability of the naïve political epistemology at work in the fact-checking branch of journalism. They may also call into question the same epistemology in journalism at large, and in politics.

AB - Fact checking has become a prominent facet of political news coverage, but it employs a variety of objectionable methodological practices, such as treating a statement containing multiple facts as if it were a single fact and categorizing as accurate or inaccurate predictions of events yet to occur. These practices share the tacit presupposition that there cannot be genuine political debate about facts, because facts are unambiguous and not subject to interpretation. Therefore, when the black-and-white facts-as they appear to the fact checkers-conflict with the claims produced by politicians, the fact checkers are able to see only (to one degree or another) "lies." The examples of dubious fact-checking practices that we discuss show the untenability of the naïve political epistemology at work in the fact-checking branch of journalism. They may also call into question the same epistemology in journalism at large, and in politics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887150141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887150141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08913811.2013.843872

DO - 10.1080/08913811.2013.843872

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 162

EP - 180

JO - Critical Review

JF - Critical Review

SN - 0891-3811

IS - 2

ER -