The emotional justification of democracy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Most political philosophers see rationally recognized human rights as justifying universal suffrage. But sentimentalism can develop its own justification for democracy. It is uncaring for rulers to deny people the vote out of a desire to retain power and privilege; and when rulers in Asia argue that Asian societies don't need democracy because of the "natural deference" of Asian people, their argument is no more persuasive than patriarchal arguments for the natural deference of women. But a positive argument for democracy emerges from Abraham Maslow's idea that all humans have a deep desire for the esteem of others. Denying people the right to vote expresses a low opinion of them, and this goes deeply against our desire for esteem. Even though democratic societies may lose out on various economic opportunities because of the electorate's unwillingness to make certain sacrifices, they provide a form of esteem that is for emotional reasons much more important to us humans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)985-996
Number of pages12
JournalRes Philosophica
Volume92
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Justification
Emotion
Democracy
Asia
Deference
Ruler
Sentimentalism
Political philosophers
Privilege
Abraham Harold Maslow
Human Rights
Suffrage
Economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

The emotional justification of democracy. / Slote, Michael.

In: Res Philosophica, Vol. 92, No. 4, 01.10.2015, p. 985-996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Slote, Michael. / The emotional justification of democracy. In: Res Philosophica. 2015 ; Vol. 92, No. 4. pp. 985-996.
@article{a4fe46e79e22425eb72735f01efcbc73,
title = "The emotional justification of democracy",
abstract = "Most political philosophers see rationally recognized human rights as justifying universal suffrage. But sentimentalism can develop its own justification for democracy. It is uncaring for rulers to deny people the vote out of a desire to retain power and privilege; and when rulers in Asia argue that Asian societies don't need democracy because of the {"}natural deference{"} of Asian people, their argument is no more persuasive than patriarchal arguments for the natural deference of women. But a positive argument for democracy emerges from Abraham Maslow's idea that all humans have a deep desire for the esteem of others. Denying people the right to vote expresses a low opinion of them, and this goes deeply against our desire for esteem. Even though democratic societies may lose out on various economic opportunities because of the electorate's unwillingness to make certain sacrifices, they provide a form of esteem that is for emotional reasons much more important to us humans.",
author = "Michael Slote",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.11612/resphil.2015.92.4.10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "985--996",
journal = "Res Philosophica",
issn = "2168-9105",
publisher = "Philosophy Documentation Center",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The emotional justification of democracy

AU - Slote, Michael

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Most political philosophers see rationally recognized human rights as justifying universal suffrage. But sentimentalism can develop its own justification for democracy. It is uncaring for rulers to deny people the vote out of a desire to retain power and privilege; and when rulers in Asia argue that Asian societies don't need democracy because of the "natural deference" of Asian people, their argument is no more persuasive than patriarchal arguments for the natural deference of women. But a positive argument for democracy emerges from Abraham Maslow's idea that all humans have a deep desire for the esteem of others. Denying people the right to vote expresses a low opinion of them, and this goes deeply against our desire for esteem. Even though democratic societies may lose out on various economic opportunities because of the electorate's unwillingness to make certain sacrifices, they provide a form of esteem that is for emotional reasons much more important to us humans.

AB - Most political philosophers see rationally recognized human rights as justifying universal suffrage. But sentimentalism can develop its own justification for democracy. It is uncaring for rulers to deny people the vote out of a desire to retain power and privilege; and when rulers in Asia argue that Asian societies don't need democracy because of the "natural deference" of Asian people, their argument is no more persuasive than patriarchal arguments for the natural deference of women. But a positive argument for democracy emerges from Abraham Maslow's idea that all humans have a deep desire for the esteem of others. Denying people the right to vote expresses a low opinion of them, and this goes deeply against our desire for esteem. Even though democratic societies may lose out on various economic opportunities because of the electorate's unwillingness to make certain sacrifices, they provide a form of esteem that is for emotional reasons much more important to us humans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994494419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994494419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11612/resphil.2015.92.4.10

DO - 10.11612/resphil.2015.92.4.10

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84994494419

VL - 92

SP - 985

EP - 996

JO - Res Philosophica

JF - Res Philosophica

SN - 2168-9105

IS - 4

ER -