The electromyographic diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Does the evidence support the El Escorial criteria?

Achraf A. Makki, Michael G Benatar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the accuracy of the El Escorial electromyographic criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Based on a consecutive series of 73 patients with suspected ALS, the sensitivity of electromyography (EMG) ranged from 0.2 in the cranial segment to 0.74 in the thoracic segment. Specificity was highest (0.92-1.0) in the cranial and thoracic segments. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to examine the effect of varying the number of abnormal segments required for the diagnosis, we found an overall accuracy of 0.90 and 0.87 if one or two abnormal segments, respectively, were required. The best combination of sensitivity and specificity was achieved by requiring EMG changes in two segments with abnormalities in a single muscle in the cranial and thoracic segments, but abnormalities in two muscles in the cervical and lumbosacral regions. These findings lend support to the EMG criteria proposed at El Escorial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)614-619
Number of pages6
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Electromyography
Thorax
Lumbosacral Region
Muscles
ROC Curve
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
  • El Escorial criteria
  • ROC curve
  • Sensitivity, specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

The electromyographic diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis : Does the evidence support the El Escorial criteria? / Makki, Achraf A.; Benatar, Michael G.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 35, No. 5, 01.05.2007, p. 614-619.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c632e4d1f5c0408994348ca1232cdcd9,
title = "The electromyographic diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Does the evidence support the El Escorial criteria?",
abstract = "The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the accuracy of the El Escorial electromyographic criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Based on a consecutive series of 73 patients with suspected ALS, the sensitivity of electromyography (EMG) ranged from 0.2 in the cranial segment to 0.74 in the thoracic segment. Specificity was highest (0.92-1.0) in the cranial and thoracic segments. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to examine the effect of varying the number of abnormal segments required for the diagnosis, we found an overall accuracy of 0.90 and 0.87 if one or two abnormal segments, respectively, were required. The best combination of sensitivity and specificity was achieved by requiring EMG changes in two segments with abnormalities in a single muscle in the cranial and thoracic segments, but abnormalities in two muscles in the cervical and lumbosacral regions. These findings lend support to the EMG criteria proposed at El Escorial.",
keywords = "Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, El Escorial criteria, ROC curve, Sensitivity, specificity",
author = "Makki, {Achraf A.} and Benatar, {Michael G}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mus.20748",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "614--619",
journal = "Muscle and Nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The electromyographic diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

T2 - Does the evidence support the El Escorial criteria?

AU - Makki, Achraf A.

AU - Benatar, Michael G

PY - 2007/5/1

Y1 - 2007/5/1

N2 - The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the accuracy of the El Escorial electromyographic criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Based on a consecutive series of 73 patients with suspected ALS, the sensitivity of electromyography (EMG) ranged from 0.2 in the cranial segment to 0.74 in the thoracic segment. Specificity was highest (0.92-1.0) in the cranial and thoracic segments. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to examine the effect of varying the number of abnormal segments required for the diagnosis, we found an overall accuracy of 0.90 and 0.87 if one or two abnormal segments, respectively, were required. The best combination of sensitivity and specificity was achieved by requiring EMG changes in two segments with abnormalities in a single muscle in the cranial and thoracic segments, but abnormalities in two muscles in the cervical and lumbosacral regions. These findings lend support to the EMG criteria proposed at El Escorial.

AB - The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the accuracy of the El Escorial electromyographic criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Based on a consecutive series of 73 patients with suspected ALS, the sensitivity of electromyography (EMG) ranged from 0.2 in the cranial segment to 0.74 in the thoracic segment. Specificity was highest (0.92-1.0) in the cranial and thoracic segments. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to examine the effect of varying the number of abnormal segments required for the diagnosis, we found an overall accuracy of 0.90 and 0.87 if one or two abnormal segments, respectively, were required. The best combination of sensitivity and specificity was achieved by requiring EMG changes in two segments with abnormalities in a single muscle in the cranial and thoracic segments, but abnormalities in two muscles in the cervical and lumbosacral regions. These findings lend support to the EMG criteria proposed at El Escorial.

KW - Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

KW - El Escorial criteria

KW - ROC curve

KW - Sensitivity, specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247581685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247581685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mus.20748

DO - 10.1002/mus.20748

M3 - Article

C2 - 17294439

AN - SCOPUS:34247581685

VL - 35

SP - 614

EP - 619

JO - Muscle and Nerve

JF - Muscle and Nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 5

ER -