The Effect of Preference Stability and Extremity on Personalized Advertising

Cong Li, Jiangmeng Liu, Cheng Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Personalized advertising is widely believed to be an effective persuasion strategy. A typical personalized advertising process consists of two phases: The message sender first “learns” the message receiver’s preferences, and then “matches” the message to that person according to his or her preferences. The present study argues that this process may be problematic because it assumes that an individual’s preferences are always stable (i.e., preferences remain the same over time) and extreme (i.e., preferences are highly polarized). Through a 2 (message type: personalized vs. nonpersonalized) × 2 (preference stability: high vs. low) × 2 (preference extremity: high vs. low) between-participants experiment (N = 227), it is shown that the effectiveness of personalized advertising is moderated by preference stability and extremity. A new conceptualization of personalization is proposed based on the study results, and how the two phases of personalized advertising may be refined is highlighted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournalism and Mass Communication Quarterly
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jun 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Marketing
personalization
persuasion
recipient
Experiments
human being
experiment

Keywords

  • match
  • personalization
  • personalized advertising
  • preference extremity
  • preference stability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

The Effect of Preference Stability and Extremity on Personalized Advertising. / Li, Cong; Liu, Jiangmeng; Hong, Cheng.

In: Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 01.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{884e9d22520f4cc182081d93bd97ae16,
title = "The Effect of Preference Stability and Extremity on Personalized Advertising",
abstract = "Personalized advertising is widely believed to be an effective persuasion strategy. A typical personalized advertising process consists of two phases: The message sender first “learns” the message receiver’s preferences, and then “matches” the message to that person according to his or her preferences. The present study argues that this process may be problematic because it assumes that an individual’s preferences are always stable (i.e., preferences remain the same over time) and extreme (i.e., preferences are highly polarized). Through a 2 (message type: personalized vs. nonpersonalized) × 2 (preference stability: high vs. low) × 2 (preference extremity: high vs. low) between-participants experiment (N = 227), it is shown that the effectiveness of personalized advertising is moderated by preference stability and extremity. A new conceptualization of personalization is proposed based on the study results, and how the two phases of personalized advertising may be refined is highlighted.",
keywords = "match, personalization, personalized advertising, preference extremity, preference stability",
author = "Cong Li and Jiangmeng Liu and Cheng Hong",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1077699018782203",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly",
issn = "1077-6990",
publisher = "Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effect of Preference Stability and Extremity on Personalized Advertising

AU - Li, Cong

AU - Liu, Jiangmeng

AU - Hong, Cheng

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Personalized advertising is widely believed to be an effective persuasion strategy. A typical personalized advertising process consists of two phases: The message sender first “learns” the message receiver’s preferences, and then “matches” the message to that person according to his or her preferences. The present study argues that this process may be problematic because it assumes that an individual’s preferences are always stable (i.e., preferences remain the same over time) and extreme (i.e., preferences are highly polarized). Through a 2 (message type: personalized vs. nonpersonalized) × 2 (preference stability: high vs. low) × 2 (preference extremity: high vs. low) between-participants experiment (N = 227), it is shown that the effectiveness of personalized advertising is moderated by preference stability and extremity. A new conceptualization of personalization is proposed based on the study results, and how the two phases of personalized advertising may be refined is highlighted.

AB - Personalized advertising is widely believed to be an effective persuasion strategy. A typical personalized advertising process consists of two phases: The message sender first “learns” the message receiver’s preferences, and then “matches” the message to that person according to his or her preferences. The present study argues that this process may be problematic because it assumes that an individual’s preferences are always stable (i.e., preferences remain the same over time) and extreme (i.e., preferences are highly polarized). Through a 2 (message type: personalized vs. nonpersonalized) × 2 (preference stability: high vs. low) × 2 (preference extremity: high vs. low) between-participants experiment (N = 227), it is shown that the effectiveness of personalized advertising is moderated by preference stability and extremity. A new conceptualization of personalization is proposed based on the study results, and how the two phases of personalized advertising may be refined is highlighted.

KW - match

KW - personalization

KW - personalized advertising

KW - preference extremity

KW - preference stability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048143554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048143554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1077699018782203

DO - 10.1177/1077699018782203

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048143554

JO - Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly

JF - Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly

SN - 1077-6990

ER -