The effect of image alignment on capillary blood flow measurement of the neuroretinal rim using the Heidelberg retina flowmeter

M. Sehi, J. G. Flanagan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To examine the influence of image alignment on the repeatability of blood flow measurements of the optic nerve. Methods: 10 normal subjects were examined. Heidelberg retina tomograph imaging was performed to establish best location and focus for the temporal neuroretinal rim. Two high quality Heidelberg retina flowmeter (HRF) images were acquired for three methods of alignment: central, nasal, and temporal. A 10 x 10 pixel measurement window was selected and exactly reproduced on all images. The interquartile pixel values were used to calculate capillary flow. ANOVA, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the coefficient of repeatability (CoR) were used for analysis. Results: There was no difference between methods (p = 0.47) or between visits (p = 0.51). The ICCs were 0.83 for the central, 0.34 for the nasal, and 0.42 for the temporal alignment. The CoR was 31.5 for central (mean effect 235.1), 234.6 for nasal, and 256.7 for temporal alignment. Conclusion: Central alignment was the most repeatable method for the measurement of neuroretinal rim capillary blood flow using the HRF.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-206
Number of pages3
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume88
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2004

Fingerprint

Flowmeters
Retina
Nose
Optic Nerve
Analysis of Variance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

The effect of image alignment on capillary blood flow measurement of the neuroretinal rim using the Heidelberg retina flowmeter. / Sehi, M.; Flanagan, J. G.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 88, No. 2, 01.02.2004, p. 204-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{79e209e572aa4f41a622287a1240ceb1,
title = "The effect of image alignment on capillary blood flow measurement of the neuroretinal rim using the Heidelberg retina flowmeter",
abstract = "Aim: To examine the influence of image alignment on the repeatability of blood flow measurements of the optic nerve. Methods: 10 normal subjects were examined. Heidelberg retina tomograph imaging was performed to establish best location and focus for the temporal neuroretinal rim. Two high quality Heidelberg retina flowmeter (HRF) images were acquired for three methods of alignment: central, nasal, and temporal. A 10 x 10 pixel measurement window was selected and exactly reproduced on all images. The interquartile pixel values were used to calculate capillary flow. ANOVA, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the coefficient of repeatability (CoR) were used for analysis. Results: There was no difference between methods (p = 0.47) or between visits (p = 0.51). The ICCs were 0.83 for the central, 0.34 for the nasal, and 0.42 for the temporal alignment. The CoR was 31.5 for central (mean effect 235.1), 234.6 for nasal, and 256.7 for temporal alignment. Conclusion: Central alignment was the most repeatable method for the measurement of neuroretinal rim capillary blood flow using the HRF.",
author = "M. Sehi and Flanagan, {J. G.}",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bjo.2003.020321",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "204--206",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of image alignment on capillary blood flow measurement of the neuroretinal rim using the Heidelberg retina flowmeter

AU - Sehi, M.

AU - Flanagan, J. G.

PY - 2004/2/1

Y1 - 2004/2/1

N2 - Aim: To examine the influence of image alignment on the repeatability of blood flow measurements of the optic nerve. Methods: 10 normal subjects were examined. Heidelberg retina tomograph imaging was performed to establish best location and focus for the temporal neuroretinal rim. Two high quality Heidelberg retina flowmeter (HRF) images were acquired for three methods of alignment: central, nasal, and temporal. A 10 x 10 pixel measurement window was selected and exactly reproduced on all images. The interquartile pixel values were used to calculate capillary flow. ANOVA, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the coefficient of repeatability (CoR) were used for analysis. Results: There was no difference between methods (p = 0.47) or between visits (p = 0.51). The ICCs were 0.83 for the central, 0.34 for the nasal, and 0.42 for the temporal alignment. The CoR was 31.5 for central (mean effect 235.1), 234.6 for nasal, and 256.7 for temporal alignment. Conclusion: Central alignment was the most repeatable method for the measurement of neuroretinal rim capillary blood flow using the HRF.

AB - Aim: To examine the influence of image alignment on the repeatability of blood flow measurements of the optic nerve. Methods: 10 normal subjects were examined. Heidelberg retina tomograph imaging was performed to establish best location and focus for the temporal neuroretinal rim. Two high quality Heidelberg retina flowmeter (HRF) images were acquired for three methods of alignment: central, nasal, and temporal. A 10 x 10 pixel measurement window was selected and exactly reproduced on all images. The interquartile pixel values were used to calculate capillary flow. ANOVA, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the coefficient of repeatability (CoR) were used for analysis. Results: There was no difference between methods (p = 0.47) or between visits (p = 0.51). The ICCs were 0.83 for the central, 0.34 for the nasal, and 0.42 for the temporal alignment. The CoR was 31.5 for central (mean effect 235.1), 234.6 for nasal, and 256.7 for temporal alignment. Conclusion: Central alignment was the most repeatable method for the measurement of neuroretinal rim capillary blood flow using the HRF.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0942290471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0942290471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjo.2003.020321

DO - 10.1136/bjo.2003.020321

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 204

EP - 206

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 2

ER -