The effect of gantry spacing resolution on plan quality in a single modulated arc optimization

Ivaylo B. Mihaylov, Bruce Curran, Edward Sternick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


Volumetric-modulated arc technique (VMAT) is an efficient form of IMRT delivery. It is advantageous over conventional IMRT in terms of treatment delivery time. This study investigates the relation between the number of segments and plan quality in VMAT optimization for a single modulated arc. Five prostate, five lung, and five head-and-neck (HN) patient plans were studied retrospectively. For each case, four VMAT plans were generated. The plans differed only in the number of control points used in the optimization process. The control points were spaced 2°, 3°, 4°, and 6° apart, respectively. All of the optimization parameters were the same among the four schemes. The 2° spacing plan was used as a reference to which the other three plans were compared. The plan quality was assessed by comparison of dose indices (DIs) and generalized equivalent uniform doses (gEUDs) for targets and critical structures. All optimization schemes generated clinically acceptable plans. The differences between the majority of reference and compared DIs and gEUDs were within 3%. DIs and gEUDs which differed in excess of 3% corresponded to dose levels well below the organ tolerances. The DI and the gEUD differences increased with an increase in plan complexity from prostates to HNs. Optimization with gantry spacing resolution of 4° seems to be a very balanced alternative between plan quality and plan complexity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)175-184
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of applied clinical medical physics
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes


  • Arc
  • Dose
  • IMRT
  • Optimization
  • Segments
  • VMAT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Instrumentation
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging


Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of gantry spacing resolution on plan quality in a single modulated arc optimization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this