The effect of audit firm size on audit prices

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In a recent issue of Journal of Accounting and Economics, Francis,1 1 The authors are indebted to Francis for his contributions to this study. developed a theory for determining the effect of audit firm size on audit prices (EAFSA). The present study offers an extension to his multivariable theory, which is otherwise viewed as an excellent attempt at presenting a realistic model of EAFSA. Further analysis of the data included in the present paper ranks the dominant variables and factors as (1) External audit fee (AFE), and Percentage of Assets (AST), and (2) Loss in last three years (LLS). In addition, this analysis reduces the multicollinearity and data redundancy of the original 11 variables by creating 6 less redundant factors from them. These new factors yield a EAFSA model of measurement with a fewer number of terms, a lower multicollinearity, and a multivariate normal distribution. The variable entitled Return on Investment (ROI) is ranked as the most subordinant, and most dependent, while (AFE) is ranked as the most dominant variable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)511-520
Number of pages10
JournalOmega
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

Firm size
Audit firms
Audit
Factors
Audit fees
Multicollinearity
Return on investment
Assets
Redundancy
External audit
Economics
Multivariate normal distribution

Keywords

  • audit fees
  • audit firm size
  • audit prices
  • auditing
  • auditors
  • external audit fee

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Information Systems and Management

Cite this

The effect of audit firm size on audit prices. / Rushinek, Avi; Rushinek, Sara.

In: Omega, Vol. 18, No. 5, 01.01.1990, p. 511-520.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{253473e67bf346858ce692f664edd147,
title = "The effect of audit firm size on audit prices",
abstract = "In a recent issue of Journal of Accounting and Economics, Francis,1 1 The authors are indebted to Francis for his contributions to this study. developed a theory for determining the effect of audit firm size on audit prices (EAFSA). The present study offers an extension to his multivariable theory, which is otherwise viewed as an excellent attempt at presenting a realistic model of EAFSA. Further analysis of the data included in the present paper ranks the dominant variables and factors as (1) External audit fee (AFE), and Percentage of Assets (AST), and (2) Loss in last three years (LLS). In addition, this analysis reduces the multicollinearity and data redundancy of the original 11 variables by creating 6 less redundant factors from them. These new factors yield a EAFSA model of measurement with a fewer number of terms, a lower multicollinearity, and a multivariate normal distribution. The variable entitled Return on Investment (ROI) is ranked as the most subordinant, and most dependent, while (AFE) is ranked as the most dominant variable.",
keywords = "audit fees, audit firm size, audit prices, auditing, auditors, external audit fee",
author = "Avi Rushinek and Sara Rushinek",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0305-0483(90)90007-V",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "511--520",
journal = "Omega",
issn = "0305-0483",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of audit firm size on audit prices

AU - Rushinek, Avi

AU - Rushinek, Sara

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - In a recent issue of Journal of Accounting and Economics, Francis,1 1 The authors are indebted to Francis for his contributions to this study. developed a theory for determining the effect of audit firm size on audit prices (EAFSA). The present study offers an extension to his multivariable theory, which is otherwise viewed as an excellent attempt at presenting a realistic model of EAFSA. Further analysis of the data included in the present paper ranks the dominant variables and factors as (1) External audit fee (AFE), and Percentage of Assets (AST), and (2) Loss in last three years (LLS). In addition, this analysis reduces the multicollinearity and data redundancy of the original 11 variables by creating 6 less redundant factors from them. These new factors yield a EAFSA model of measurement with a fewer number of terms, a lower multicollinearity, and a multivariate normal distribution. The variable entitled Return on Investment (ROI) is ranked as the most subordinant, and most dependent, while (AFE) is ranked as the most dominant variable.

AB - In a recent issue of Journal of Accounting and Economics, Francis,1 1 The authors are indebted to Francis for his contributions to this study. developed a theory for determining the effect of audit firm size on audit prices (EAFSA). The present study offers an extension to his multivariable theory, which is otherwise viewed as an excellent attempt at presenting a realistic model of EAFSA. Further analysis of the data included in the present paper ranks the dominant variables and factors as (1) External audit fee (AFE), and Percentage of Assets (AST), and (2) Loss in last three years (LLS). In addition, this analysis reduces the multicollinearity and data redundancy of the original 11 variables by creating 6 less redundant factors from them. These new factors yield a EAFSA model of measurement with a fewer number of terms, a lower multicollinearity, and a multivariate normal distribution. The variable entitled Return on Investment (ROI) is ranked as the most subordinant, and most dependent, while (AFE) is ranked as the most dominant variable.

KW - audit fees

KW - audit firm size

KW - audit prices

KW - auditing

KW - auditors

KW - external audit fee

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29444452876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29444452876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0305-0483(90)90007-V

DO - 10.1016/0305-0483(90)90007-V

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:29444452876

VL - 18

SP - 511

EP - 520

JO - Omega

JF - Omega

SN - 0305-0483

IS - 5

ER -