The dsRNA-dependent protein kinase, PKR and cell death

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PKR has been shown to potentially regulate cell death in response to a number of stimuli such as dsRNA, and may even be activated following direct interaction with other proteins. What is less clear is how PKR may mediate these effects. While some data indicate that PKR can facilitate cell death through eIF2α and the regulation of translation, other data indicate that this may not be sufficient on its own to trigger apoptosis. Almost certainly a combination of other stress-related events would need to occur to condemn the cell to die. Presently, it is clear that PKR is important in preventing virus translation, through eIF2α phosphorylation, following infection of the cell. This event would allow time for IFN to be produced, to fortify an antiviral state. However, it is also extremely likely that PKR functions to regulate pathways other than those involving eIF2 that may similarly facilitate host defense against virus infection or which govern cell death. This could involve signaling mechanisms involving the FADD, NF-κB or the p38, MAPK stress kinase pathways. Elucidating the exact mechanisms of PKR-associated cell death remains an important issue since this kinase plays a key role in antiviral host defense and perhaps tumorigenesis. In addition, recent studies show that PKR may play a role in neurogenerative diseases. The potential value of understanding how PKR may regulate cell growth and apoptosis may thus provide therapeutic opportunities that could be exploited in strategies designed to combat viral, malignant and neurodegenerative disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)563-570
Number of pages8
JournalCell Death and Differentiation
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2005

Fingerprint

eIF-2 Kinase
Cell Death
Virus Diseases
Antiviral Agents
Apoptosis
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases
p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Carcinogenesis
Phosphotransferases
Phosphorylation
Viruses
Growth
Infection
Proteins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cell Biology

Cite this

The dsRNA-dependent protein kinase, PKR and cell death. / Barber, Glen N.

In: Cell Death and Differentiation, Vol. 12, No. 6, 01.06.2005, p. 563-570.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{74725ed9c40d45d8a6cb00e592c3e5f1,
title = "The dsRNA-dependent protein kinase, PKR and cell death",
abstract = "PKR has been shown to potentially regulate cell death in response to a number of stimuli such as dsRNA, and may even be activated following direct interaction with other proteins. What is less clear is how PKR may mediate these effects. While some data indicate that PKR can facilitate cell death through eIF2α and the regulation of translation, other data indicate that this may not be sufficient on its own to trigger apoptosis. Almost certainly a combination of other stress-related events would need to occur to condemn the cell to die. Presently, it is clear that PKR is important in preventing virus translation, through eIF2α phosphorylation, following infection of the cell. This event would allow time for IFN to be produced, to fortify an antiviral state. However, it is also extremely likely that PKR functions to regulate pathways other than those involving eIF2 that may similarly facilitate host defense against virus infection or which govern cell death. This could involve signaling mechanisms involving the FADD, NF-κB or the p38, MAPK stress kinase pathways. Elucidating the exact mechanisms of PKR-associated cell death remains an important issue since this kinase plays a key role in antiviral host defense and perhaps tumorigenesis. In addition, recent studies show that PKR may play a role in neurogenerative diseases. The potential value of understanding how PKR may regulate cell growth and apoptosis may thus provide therapeutic opportunities that could be exploited in strategies designed to combat viral, malignant and neurodegenerative disease.",
author = "Barber, {Glen N}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/sj.cdd.4401643",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "563--570",
journal = "Cell Death and Differentiation",
issn = "1350-9047",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The dsRNA-dependent protein kinase, PKR and cell death

AU - Barber, Glen N

PY - 2005/6/1

Y1 - 2005/6/1

N2 - PKR has been shown to potentially regulate cell death in response to a number of stimuli such as dsRNA, and may even be activated following direct interaction with other proteins. What is less clear is how PKR may mediate these effects. While some data indicate that PKR can facilitate cell death through eIF2α and the regulation of translation, other data indicate that this may not be sufficient on its own to trigger apoptosis. Almost certainly a combination of other stress-related events would need to occur to condemn the cell to die. Presently, it is clear that PKR is important in preventing virus translation, through eIF2α phosphorylation, following infection of the cell. This event would allow time for IFN to be produced, to fortify an antiviral state. However, it is also extremely likely that PKR functions to regulate pathways other than those involving eIF2 that may similarly facilitate host defense against virus infection or which govern cell death. This could involve signaling mechanisms involving the FADD, NF-κB or the p38, MAPK stress kinase pathways. Elucidating the exact mechanisms of PKR-associated cell death remains an important issue since this kinase plays a key role in antiviral host defense and perhaps tumorigenesis. In addition, recent studies show that PKR may play a role in neurogenerative diseases. The potential value of understanding how PKR may regulate cell growth and apoptosis may thus provide therapeutic opportunities that could be exploited in strategies designed to combat viral, malignant and neurodegenerative disease.

AB - PKR has been shown to potentially regulate cell death in response to a number of stimuli such as dsRNA, and may even be activated following direct interaction with other proteins. What is less clear is how PKR may mediate these effects. While some data indicate that PKR can facilitate cell death through eIF2α and the regulation of translation, other data indicate that this may not be sufficient on its own to trigger apoptosis. Almost certainly a combination of other stress-related events would need to occur to condemn the cell to die. Presently, it is clear that PKR is important in preventing virus translation, through eIF2α phosphorylation, following infection of the cell. This event would allow time for IFN to be produced, to fortify an antiviral state. However, it is also extremely likely that PKR functions to regulate pathways other than those involving eIF2 that may similarly facilitate host defense against virus infection or which govern cell death. This could involve signaling mechanisms involving the FADD, NF-κB or the p38, MAPK stress kinase pathways. Elucidating the exact mechanisms of PKR-associated cell death remains an important issue since this kinase plays a key role in antiviral host defense and perhaps tumorigenesis. In addition, recent studies show that PKR may play a role in neurogenerative diseases. The potential value of understanding how PKR may regulate cell growth and apoptosis may thus provide therapeutic opportunities that could be exploited in strategies designed to combat viral, malignant and neurodegenerative disease.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20044378565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20044378565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401643

DO - 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401643

M3 - Article

C2 - 15846372

AN - SCOPUS:20044378565

VL - 12

SP - 563

EP - 570

JO - Cell Death and Differentiation

JF - Cell Death and Differentiation

SN - 1350-9047

IS - 6

ER -