The drexler-smalley debate on nanotechnology: Incommensurability at work?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a recent debate, Eric Drexler and Richard Smalley have discussed the chemical and physical possibility of constructing molecular assemblers - devices that guide chemical reactions by placing, with atomic precision, reactive molecules. Drexler insisted on the mechanical feasibility of such assemblers, whereas Smalley resisted the idea that such devices could be chemically constructed, because we do not have the required control. Underlying the debate, there are differences regarding the appropriate goals, methods, and theories of nanotechnology, and the appropriate way of conceptualizing molecular assemblers. Not surprisingly, incommensurability emerges. In this chapter, I assess the main features of the debate, the levels of the emerging incommensurability, and indicate one way in which the debate could be decided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationNanotechnology Challenges
Subtitle of host publicationImplications for Philosophy, Ethics and Society
PublisherWorld Scientific Publishing Co.
Pages29-48
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9789812773975
ISBN (Print)9812567291, 9789812567291
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Engineering(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The drexler-smalley debate on nanotechnology: Incommensurability at work?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Bueno, O. (2006). The drexler-smalley debate on nanotechnology: Incommensurability at work? In Nanotechnology Challenges: Implications for Philosophy, Ethics and Society (pp. 29-48). World Scientific Publishing Co.. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812773975_0003