The Domestic Use of Drones: An Ethical Analysis of Surveillance Issues

Jonathan West, James S. Bowman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drone surveillance can be regarded either as a justifiable, impartial practice serving the interests of all or as an oppressive technique catering to the interests of some at the expense of others. This analysis is an effort to weigh the ethical prospects and problems in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles by asking whether surveillance of civilians is ethical. To address this question, classical philosophical and modern behavioral approaches to ethics are used. The inquiry begins with the importance of the issue, followed by its evolution and current status. After describing the method of analysis, the article examines arguments for and against domestic monitoring. The unique utility of drones can accomplish much in the public interest while simultaneously creating moral hazards. The conclusion discusses accountability standards, model legislation provisions, and regulatory criteria for aerial vehicle surveillance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPublic Administration Review
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

surveillance
public interest
legislation
moral philosophy
monitoring
responsibility
Surveillance
Legislation
Public interest
Accountability
Expenses
Monitoring
Moral hazard

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

The Domestic Use of Drones : An Ethical Analysis of Surveillance Issues. / West, Jonathan; Bowman, James S.

In: Public Administration Review, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{40165cdd87b44c569a62aca5aae19732,
title = "The Domestic Use of Drones: An Ethical Analysis of Surveillance Issues",
abstract = "Drone surveillance can be regarded either as a justifiable, impartial practice serving the interests of all or as an oppressive technique catering to the interests of some at the expense of others. This analysis is an effort to weigh the ethical prospects and problems in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles by asking whether surveillance of civilians is ethical. To address this question, classical philosophical and modern behavioral approaches to ethics are used. The inquiry begins with the importance of the issue, followed by its evolution and current status. After describing the method of analysis, the article examines arguments for and against domestic monitoring. The unique utility of drones can accomplish much in the public interest while simultaneously creating moral hazards. The conclusion discusses accountability standards, model legislation provisions, and regulatory criteria for aerial vehicle surveillance.",
author = "Jonathan West and Bowman, {James S.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/puar.12506",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Public Administration Review",
issn = "0033-3352",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Domestic Use of Drones

T2 - An Ethical Analysis of Surveillance Issues

AU - West, Jonathan

AU - Bowman, James S.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Drone surveillance can be regarded either as a justifiable, impartial practice serving the interests of all or as an oppressive technique catering to the interests of some at the expense of others. This analysis is an effort to weigh the ethical prospects and problems in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles by asking whether surveillance of civilians is ethical. To address this question, classical philosophical and modern behavioral approaches to ethics are used. The inquiry begins with the importance of the issue, followed by its evolution and current status. After describing the method of analysis, the article examines arguments for and against domestic monitoring. The unique utility of drones can accomplish much in the public interest while simultaneously creating moral hazards. The conclusion discusses accountability standards, model legislation provisions, and regulatory criteria for aerial vehicle surveillance.

AB - Drone surveillance can be regarded either as a justifiable, impartial practice serving the interests of all or as an oppressive technique catering to the interests of some at the expense of others. This analysis is an effort to weigh the ethical prospects and problems in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles by asking whether surveillance of civilians is ethical. To address this question, classical philosophical and modern behavioral approaches to ethics are used. The inquiry begins with the importance of the issue, followed by its evolution and current status. After describing the method of analysis, the article examines arguments for and against domestic monitoring. The unique utility of drones can accomplish much in the public interest while simultaneously creating moral hazards. The conclusion discusses accountability standards, model legislation provisions, and regulatory criteria for aerial vehicle surveillance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953287058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953287058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/puar.12506

DO - 10.1111/puar.12506

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84953287058

JO - Public Administration Review

JF - Public Administration Review

SN - 0033-3352

ER -