The diagnostic value of urine versus bladder washing in patients with bladder cancer

W. M. Murphy, W. N. Crabtree, A. F. Jukkola, M. S. Soloway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a prospective, critical appraisal of simultaneously collected cystoscopic urine and bladder washing for the evaluation of patients with bladder cancer little consistent difference in cellular yield or preservation could be documented between the 2 techniques. Diagnostic cells usually occurred in both types of specimens but in 20 to 30 per cent of the cases they could be identified only in cystoscopic urine. Over-all, 13.1 per cent of the cancers would have been missed had cystoscopic urine not been examined cytologically. Although bladder washing alone has a greater diagnostic yield than cystoscopic urine alone urine remains a valuable source of diagnostic information and should be evaluated, even when simultaneously collected bladder washings are available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-322
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume126
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1981

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The diagnostic value of urine versus bladder washing in patients with bladder cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this