The curious case of behavioral backlash: Why brands produce priming effects and slogans produce reverse priming effects

Juliano Laran, Amy N. Dalton, Eduardo B. Andrade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Scopus citations

Abstract

Five experiments demonstrate that brands cause priming effects (i.e., behavioral effects consistent with those implied by the brand), whereas slogans cause reverse priming effects (i.e., behavioral effects opposite to those implied by the slogan). For instance, exposure to the retailer brand name "Walmart," typically associated with saving money, reduces subsequent spending, whereas exposure to the Walmart slogan, "Save money. Live better," increases it. Slogans cause reverse priming effects and brands cause priming effects because people perceive slogans, but not brands, as persuasion tactics. The reverse priming effect is driven by a nonconscious goal to correct for bias and can occur without any conscious mediation (i.e., following subliminal exposure to the word "slogan"). These findings provide evidence that consumer resistance to persuasion can be driven by processes that operate entirely outside conscious awareness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)999-1014
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Consumer Research
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The curious case of behavioral backlash: Why brands produce priming effects and slogans produce reverse priming effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this