The cumulative deficit hypothesis in the light of cross-cultural evidence

Carmen Saco-Pollitt, Ernesto Pollitt, Daryl Greenfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The cumulative deficit hypothesis proposes that under conditions of marked social and environmental deprivation growth and development deficits in children will augment as children grow older. This study assessed between group (cultures) differences in intra-group (age) changes in performance of 3 to 6-year-old children in a battery of tests (Discrimination Learning, Short-Term Memory and Oddity Learning) derived from a theoretical model relating attention, learning and memory processes. Subjects were selected from Cambridge, Massachusetts, and from two lowland villages in Guatemala. The two groups of children were exposed to markedly different environments and presented significant differences in health and nutrition status. The focus of the study is on whether the developmental trends observed within groups are different between groups. Age trends within samples were analyzed by breaking the age into three groups: 31 to 42, 43 to 54, and 55 to 66 months. In Cambridge changes in test performance as a function of age were present in all Discrimination Learning and Oddity Learning tasks; whereas in Guatemala there was no systematic evidence of an age improvement in learning. In both samples there were generally no age effects in the Memory tests. The evidence presented is in line with the notion of progressively increased risk, at least during the preschool period, among severely impoverished populations where the psychosocial and biophysical needs of children are not adequately met.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-97
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Development
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1985

Fingerprint

deficit
discrimination learning
Learning
Guatemala
Discrimination Learning
evidence
Group
learning
Social Conditions
trend
Nutritional Status
Growth and Development
Short-Term Memory
deprivation
Health Status
nutrition
performance
age group
Theoretical Models
village

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

The cumulative deficit hypothesis in the light of cross-cultural evidence. / Saco-Pollitt, Carmen; Pollitt, Ernesto; Greenfield, Daryl.

In: International Journal of Behavioral Development, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1985, p. 75-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2dade104d66a4cb48783de482aad3e61,
title = "The cumulative deficit hypothesis in the light of cross-cultural evidence",
abstract = "The cumulative deficit hypothesis proposes that under conditions of marked social and environmental deprivation growth and development deficits in children will augment as children grow older. This study assessed between group (cultures) differences in intra-group (age) changes in performance of 3 to 6-year-old children in a battery of tests (Discrimination Learning, Short-Term Memory and Oddity Learning) derived from a theoretical model relating attention, learning and memory processes. Subjects were selected from Cambridge, Massachusetts, and from two lowland villages in Guatemala. The two groups of children were exposed to markedly different environments and presented significant differences in health and nutrition status. The focus of the study is on whether the developmental trends observed within groups are different between groups. Age trends within samples were analyzed by breaking the age into three groups: 31 to 42, 43 to 54, and 55 to 66 months. In Cambridge changes in test performance as a function of age were present in all Discrimination Learning and Oddity Learning tasks; whereas in Guatemala there was no systematic evidence of an age improvement in learning. In both samples there were generally no age effects in the Memory tests. The evidence presented is in line with the notion of progressively increased risk, at least during the preschool period, among severely impoverished populations where the psychosocial and biophysical needs of children are not adequately met.",
author = "Carmen Saco-Pollitt and Ernesto Pollitt and Daryl Greenfield",
year = "1985",
doi = "10.1177/016502548500800106",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "75--97",
journal = "International Journal of Behavioral Development",
issn = "0165-0254",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The cumulative deficit hypothesis in the light of cross-cultural evidence

AU - Saco-Pollitt, Carmen

AU - Pollitt, Ernesto

AU - Greenfield, Daryl

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - The cumulative deficit hypothesis proposes that under conditions of marked social and environmental deprivation growth and development deficits in children will augment as children grow older. This study assessed between group (cultures) differences in intra-group (age) changes in performance of 3 to 6-year-old children in a battery of tests (Discrimination Learning, Short-Term Memory and Oddity Learning) derived from a theoretical model relating attention, learning and memory processes. Subjects were selected from Cambridge, Massachusetts, and from two lowland villages in Guatemala. The two groups of children were exposed to markedly different environments and presented significant differences in health and nutrition status. The focus of the study is on whether the developmental trends observed within groups are different between groups. Age trends within samples were analyzed by breaking the age into three groups: 31 to 42, 43 to 54, and 55 to 66 months. In Cambridge changes in test performance as a function of age were present in all Discrimination Learning and Oddity Learning tasks; whereas in Guatemala there was no systematic evidence of an age improvement in learning. In both samples there were generally no age effects in the Memory tests. The evidence presented is in line with the notion of progressively increased risk, at least during the preschool period, among severely impoverished populations where the psychosocial and biophysical needs of children are not adequately met.

AB - The cumulative deficit hypothesis proposes that under conditions of marked social and environmental deprivation growth and development deficits in children will augment as children grow older. This study assessed between group (cultures) differences in intra-group (age) changes in performance of 3 to 6-year-old children in a battery of tests (Discrimination Learning, Short-Term Memory and Oddity Learning) derived from a theoretical model relating attention, learning and memory processes. Subjects were selected from Cambridge, Massachusetts, and from two lowland villages in Guatemala. The two groups of children were exposed to markedly different environments and presented significant differences in health and nutrition status. The focus of the study is on whether the developmental trends observed within groups are different between groups. Age trends within samples were analyzed by breaking the age into three groups: 31 to 42, 43 to 54, and 55 to 66 months. In Cambridge changes in test performance as a function of age were present in all Discrimination Learning and Oddity Learning tasks; whereas in Guatemala there was no systematic evidence of an age improvement in learning. In both samples there were generally no age effects in the Memory tests. The evidence presented is in line with the notion of progressively increased risk, at least during the preschool period, among severely impoverished populations where the psychosocial and biophysical needs of children are not adequately met.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970390382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970390382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/016502548500800106

DO - 10.1177/016502548500800106

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84970390382

VL - 8

SP - 75

EP - 97

JO - International Journal of Behavioral Development

JF - International Journal of Behavioral Development

SN - 0165-0254

IS - 1

ER -