The COLA global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM

Benjamin Kirtman, Yun Fan, Edwin K. Schneider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies (COLA) global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM models are described. The ocean and atmosphere components of these coupled models are identical. The only difference between them is in the coupling strategy. The anomaly coupling strategy guarantees that the climatology of the coupled model is close to the observed climatology, whereas the global coupled model suffers from serious climate drift. This climate drift is largest in the eastern tropical Pacific where the coupled model is too warm by as much as 5°C. The climate drift in the coupled model can also be seen by the predominance of an erroneous double intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) in the eastern tropical Pacific. Despite the climate drift, both models exhibit robust interannual variability in the tropical Pacific. Composite analysis, however, reveals that the characteristics of interannual variability in the coupled and the anomaly coupled models are markedly different. For example, the coupled model exhibits a distinct eastward migration of the ENSO events, whereas the anomaly coupled model is dominated by a standing mode, which is too strongly phase-locked to the annual cycle. Based on diagnostic ocean model simulations, it is shown that an erroneous eastward migration of the annual cycle of thermocline depth and upwelling is responsible for the eastward migration of the ENSO events in the coupled model. The anomaly coupled model has a comparatively weak annual cycle in the thermocline depth and upwelling. These calculations emphasize the importance of correctly simulating the mean state in order to capture realistic ENSO variability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2301-2320
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Climate
Volume15
Issue number17
StatePublished - Sep 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

general circulation model
anomaly
atmosphere
ocean
annual cycle
El Nino-Southern Oscillation
climate
thermocline
land
climatology
upwelling
intertropical convergence zone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

The COLA global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM. / Kirtman, Benjamin; Fan, Yun; Schneider, Edwin K.

In: Journal of Climate, Vol. 15, No. 17, 01.09.2002, p. 2301-2320.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kirtman, B, Fan, Y & Schneider, EK 2002, 'The COLA global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM', Journal of Climate, vol. 15, no. 17, pp. 2301-2320.
Kirtman, Benjamin ; Fan, Yun ; Schneider, Edwin K. / The COLA global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM. In: Journal of Climate. 2002 ; Vol. 15, No. 17. pp. 2301-2320.
@article{8c7a936349634808abcd0ff3659df21c,
title = "The COLA global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM",
abstract = "The Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies (COLA) global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM models are described. The ocean and atmosphere components of these coupled models are identical. The only difference between them is in the coupling strategy. The anomaly coupling strategy guarantees that the climatology of the coupled model is close to the observed climatology, whereas the global coupled model suffers from serious climate drift. This climate drift is largest in the eastern tropical Pacific where the coupled model is too warm by as much as 5°C. The climate drift in the coupled model can also be seen by the predominance of an erroneous double intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) in the eastern tropical Pacific. Despite the climate drift, both models exhibit robust interannual variability in the tropical Pacific. Composite analysis, however, reveals that the characteristics of interannual variability in the coupled and the anomaly coupled models are markedly different. For example, the coupled model exhibits a distinct eastward migration of the ENSO events, whereas the anomaly coupled model is dominated by a standing mode, which is too strongly phase-locked to the annual cycle. Based on diagnostic ocean model simulations, it is shown that an erroneous eastward migration of the annual cycle of thermocline depth and upwelling is responsible for the eastward migration of the ENSO events in the coupled model. The anomaly coupled model has a comparatively weak annual cycle in the thermocline depth and upwelling. These calculations emphasize the importance of correctly simulating the mean state in order to capture realistic ENSO variability.",
author = "Benjamin Kirtman and Yun Fan and Schneider, {Edwin K.}",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "2301--2320",
journal = "Journal of Climate",
issn = "0894-8755",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The COLA global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM

AU - Kirtman, Benjamin

AU - Fan, Yun

AU - Schneider, Edwin K.

PY - 2002/9/1

Y1 - 2002/9/1

N2 - The Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies (COLA) global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM models are described. The ocean and atmosphere components of these coupled models are identical. The only difference between them is in the coupling strategy. The anomaly coupling strategy guarantees that the climatology of the coupled model is close to the observed climatology, whereas the global coupled model suffers from serious climate drift. This climate drift is largest in the eastern tropical Pacific where the coupled model is too warm by as much as 5°C. The climate drift in the coupled model can also be seen by the predominance of an erroneous double intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) in the eastern tropical Pacific. Despite the climate drift, both models exhibit robust interannual variability in the tropical Pacific. Composite analysis, however, reveals that the characteristics of interannual variability in the coupled and the anomaly coupled models are markedly different. For example, the coupled model exhibits a distinct eastward migration of the ENSO events, whereas the anomaly coupled model is dominated by a standing mode, which is too strongly phase-locked to the annual cycle. Based on diagnostic ocean model simulations, it is shown that an erroneous eastward migration of the annual cycle of thermocline depth and upwelling is responsible for the eastward migration of the ENSO events in the coupled model. The anomaly coupled model has a comparatively weak annual cycle in the thermocline depth and upwelling. These calculations emphasize the importance of correctly simulating the mean state in order to capture realistic ENSO variability.

AB - The Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies (COLA) global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM models are described. The ocean and atmosphere components of these coupled models are identical. The only difference between them is in the coupling strategy. The anomaly coupling strategy guarantees that the climatology of the coupled model is close to the observed climatology, whereas the global coupled model suffers from serious climate drift. This climate drift is largest in the eastern tropical Pacific where the coupled model is too warm by as much as 5°C. The climate drift in the coupled model can also be seen by the predominance of an erroneous double intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) in the eastern tropical Pacific. Despite the climate drift, both models exhibit robust interannual variability in the tropical Pacific. Composite analysis, however, reveals that the characteristics of interannual variability in the coupled and the anomaly coupled models are markedly different. For example, the coupled model exhibits a distinct eastward migration of the ENSO events, whereas the anomaly coupled model is dominated by a standing mode, which is too strongly phase-locked to the annual cycle. Based on diagnostic ocean model simulations, it is shown that an erroneous eastward migration of the annual cycle of thermocline depth and upwelling is responsible for the eastward migration of the ENSO events in the coupled model. The anomaly coupled model has a comparatively weak annual cycle in the thermocline depth and upwelling. These calculations emphasize the importance of correctly simulating the mean state in order to capture realistic ENSO variability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036749528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036749528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 2301

EP - 2320

JO - Journal of Climate

JF - Journal of Climate

SN - 0894-8755

IS - 17

ER -