The challenge of creating new OSCE measures to capture the characteristics of expertise

Brian Hodges, Nancy McNaughton, Glenn Regehr, Richard Tiberius, Mark Hanson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Although expert clinicians approach interviewing in a different manner than novices, OSCE measures have not traditionally been designed to take into account levels of expertise. Creating better OSCE measures requires an understanding of how the interviewing style of experts differs objectively from novices. Methods: Fourteen clinical clerks, 14 family practice residents and 14 family physicians were videotaped during 2 15-minute standardized patient interviews. Videotapes were reviewed and every utterance coded by type including questions, empathic comments, giving information, summary statements and articulated transitions. Utterances were plotted over time and examined for characteristic patterns related to level of expertise. Results: The mean number of utterances exceeded one every 10 s for all groups. The largest proportion was questions, ranging from 76% of utterances for clerks to 67% for experts. One third of total utterances consisted of a group of 'low frequency' types, including empathic comments, information giving and summary statements. The topic was changed often by all groups. While utterance type over time appeared to show characteristic patterns reflective of expertise, the differences were not robust. Only the pattern of use of summary statements was statistically different between groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Measures that are sensitive to the nature of expertise, including the sequence and organisation of questions, should be used to supplement OSCE checklists that simply count questions. Specifically, information giving, empathic comments and summary statements that occupy a third of expert interviews should be credited. However, while there appear to be patterns of utterances that characterise levels of expertise, in this study these patterns were subtle and not amenable to counting and classification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)742-748
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Education
Volume36
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 20 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

OSCE
expertise
Interviews
Videotape Recording
Family Practice
expert
Family Physicians
Checklist
Group
family physician
interview
supplement
resident

Keywords

  • Clinical competence
  • Education, medical/standards
  • Educational measurement/standards
  • Interviews/methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Education
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

The challenge of creating new OSCE measures to capture the characteristics of expertise. / Hodges, Brian; McNaughton, Nancy; Regehr, Glenn; Tiberius, Richard; Hanson, Mark.

In: Medical Education, Vol. 36, No. 8, 20.09.2002, p. 742-748.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hodges, B, McNaughton, N, Regehr, G, Tiberius, R & Hanson, M 2002, 'The challenge of creating new OSCE measures to capture the characteristics of expertise', Medical Education, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 742-748. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01203.x
Hodges, Brian ; McNaughton, Nancy ; Regehr, Glenn ; Tiberius, Richard ; Hanson, Mark. / The challenge of creating new OSCE measures to capture the characteristics of expertise. In: Medical Education. 2002 ; Vol. 36, No. 8. pp. 742-748.
@article{d76f5f329c044d1b8e5ba139350f8b8a,
title = "The challenge of creating new OSCE measures to capture the characteristics of expertise",
abstract = "Purpose: Although expert clinicians approach interviewing in a different manner than novices, OSCE measures have not traditionally been designed to take into account levels of expertise. Creating better OSCE measures requires an understanding of how the interviewing style of experts differs objectively from novices. Methods: Fourteen clinical clerks, 14 family practice residents and 14 family physicians were videotaped during 2 15-minute standardized patient interviews. Videotapes were reviewed and every utterance coded by type including questions, empathic comments, giving information, summary statements and articulated transitions. Utterances were plotted over time and examined for characteristic patterns related to level of expertise. Results: The mean number of utterances exceeded one every 10 s for all groups. The largest proportion was questions, ranging from 76{\%} of utterances for clerks to 67{\%} for experts. One third of total utterances consisted of a group of 'low frequency' types, including empathic comments, information giving and summary statements. The topic was changed often by all groups. While utterance type over time appeared to show characteristic patterns reflective of expertise, the differences were not robust. Only the pattern of use of summary statements was statistically different between groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Measures that are sensitive to the nature of expertise, including the sequence and organisation of questions, should be used to supplement OSCE checklists that simply count questions. Specifically, information giving, empathic comments and summary statements that occupy a third of expert interviews should be credited. However, while there appear to be patterns of utterances that characterise levels of expertise, in this study these patterns were subtle and not amenable to counting and classification.",
keywords = "Clinical competence, Education, medical/standards, Educational measurement/standards, Interviews/methods",
author = "Brian Hodges and Nancy McNaughton and Glenn Regehr and Richard Tiberius and Mark Hanson",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01203.x",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "742--748",
journal = "Medical Education",
issn = "0308-0110",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The challenge of creating new OSCE measures to capture the characteristics of expertise

AU - Hodges, Brian

AU - McNaughton, Nancy

AU - Regehr, Glenn

AU - Tiberius, Richard

AU - Hanson, Mark

PY - 2002/9/20

Y1 - 2002/9/20

N2 - Purpose: Although expert clinicians approach interviewing in a different manner than novices, OSCE measures have not traditionally been designed to take into account levels of expertise. Creating better OSCE measures requires an understanding of how the interviewing style of experts differs objectively from novices. Methods: Fourteen clinical clerks, 14 family practice residents and 14 family physicians were videotaped during 2 15-minute standardized patient interviews. Videotapes were reviewed and every utterance coded by type including questions, empathic comments, giving information, summary statements and articulated transitions. Utterances were plotted over time and examined for characteristic patterns related to level of expertise. Results: The mean number of utterances exceeded one every 10 s for all groups. The largest proportion was questions, ranging from 76% of utterances for clerks to 67% for experts. One third of total utterances consisted of a group of 'low frequency' types, including empathic comments, information giving and summary statements. The topic was changed often by all groups. While utterance type over time appeared to show characteristic patterns reflective of expertise, the differences were not robust. Only the pattern of use of summary statements was statistically different between groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Measures that are sensitive to the nature of expertise, including the sequence and organisation of questions, should be used to supplement OSCE checklists that simply count questions. Specifically, information giving, empathic comments and summary statements that occupy a third of expert interviews should be credited. However, while there appear to be patterns of utterances that characterise levels of expertise, in this study these patterns were subtle and not amenable to counting and classification.

AB - Purpose: Although expert clinicians approach interviewing in a different manner than novices, OSCE measures have not traditionally been designed to take into account levels of expertise. Creating better OSCE measures requires an understanding of how the interviewing style of experts differs objectively from novices. Methods: Fourteen clinical clerks, 14 family practice residents and 14 family physicians were videotaped during 2 15-minute standardized patient interviews. Videotapes were reviewed and every utterance coded by type including questions, empathic comments, giving information, summary statements and articulated transitions. Utterances were plotted over time and examined for characteristic patterns related to level of expertise. Results: The mean number of utterances exceeded one every 10 s for all groups. The largest proportion was questions, ranging from 76% of utterances for clerks to 67% for experts. One third of total utterances consisted of a group of 'low frequency' types, including empathic comments, information giving and summary statements. The topic was changed often by all groups. While utterance type over time appeared to show characteristic patterns reflective of expertise, the differences were not robust. Only the pattern of use of summary statements was statistically different between groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Measures that are sensitive to the nature of expertise, including the sequence and organisation of questions, should be used to supplement OSCE checklists that simply count questions. Specifically, information giving, empathic comments and summary statements that occupy a third of expert interviews should be credited. However, while there appear to be patterns of utterances that characterise levels of expertise, in this study these patterns were subtle and not amenable to counting and classification.

KW - Clinical competence

KW - Education, medical/standards

KW - Educational measurement/standards

KW - Interviews/methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036039778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036039778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01203.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01203.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 12191057

AN - SCOPUS:0036039778

VL - 36

SP - 742

EP - 748

JO - Medical Education

JF - Medical Education

SN - 0308-0110

IS - 8

ER -