The Bayley scales of infant development II

Where to start?

Susan M. Gauthier, Charles R Bauer, Daniel S Messinger, Janine M. Closius

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines whether the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (Bayley II) Mental Scale scores vary on the basis of which item set is considered the starting point of an infant's assessment The Bayley II was administered to 78 12-month-old infants by certified examiners beginning with the 12-month age item set. A second certified examiner then administered 10 additional items that completed the 11-month and 13-month age item sets. Of the 78 infants tested, 73 (94%) met basal and ceiling criteria in all three item sets. Three separate Mental Developmental Index (MDI) scores were calculated using 12-month norms for each subject, which were based on the raw scores generated from the 11-, 12-, and 13-month age item sets Scores calculated on the 11-month set were significantly lower than those on the 12-month set, which were in turn significantly lower than those on the 13-month set. When tested on the 11-month instead of on the 12-month item set, twice as many infants received lower than normal (<85) MDI scores, indicating an impact on referability decisions. Minor adjustments in administration of the Bayley II, such as those based on assumptions regarding an infant's current level of functioning, significantly affect infant test scores and eligibility for follow-up services. Standardized use of this test should minimize variability in test scores. J Dev Behav Pediatr 20:75-79, 1999.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-79
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics
Volume20
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1 1999

Fingerprint

Child Development
Social Adjustment

Keywords

  • Administration
  • Bayley II
  • Bias
  • Development
  • Mental

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

The Bayley scales of infant development II : Where to start? / Gauthier, Susan M.; Bauer, Charles R; Messinger, Daniel S; Closius, Janine M.

In: Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.04.1999, p. 75-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gauthier, Susan M. ; Bauer, Charles R ; Messinger, Daniel S ; Closius, Janine M. / The Bayley scales of infant development II : Where to start?. In: Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. 1999 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 75-79.
@article{1db097e9fec2448a95a848e843a31475,
title = "The Bayley scales of infant development II: Where to start?",
abstract = "This study examines whether the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (Bayley II) Mental Scale scores vary on the basis of which item set is considered the starting point of an infant's assessment The Bayley II was administered to 78 12-month-old infants by certified examiners beginning with the 12-month age item set. A second certified examiner then administered 10 additional items that completed the 11-month and 13-month age item sets. Of the 78 infants tested, 73 (94{\%}) met basal and ceiling criteria in all three item sets. Three separate Mental Developmental Index (MDI) scores were calculated using 12-month norms for each subject, which were based on the raw scores generated from the 11-, 12-, and 13-month age item sets Scores calculated on the 11-month set were significantly lower than those on the 12-month set, which were in turn significantly lower than those on the 13-month set. When tested on the 11-month instead of on the 12-month item set, twice as many infants received lower than normal (<85) MDI scores, indicating an impact on referability decisions. Minor adjustments in administration of the Bayley II, such as those based on assumptions regarding an infant's current level of functioning, significantly affect infant test scores and eligibility for follow-up services. Standardized use of this test should minimize variability in test scores. J Dev Behav Pediatr 20:75-79, 1999.",
keywords = "Administration, Bayley II, Bias, Development, Mental",
author = "Gauthier, {Susan M.} and Bauer, {Charles R} and Messinger, {Daniel S} and Closius, {Janine M.}",
year = "1999",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "75--79",
journal = "Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics",
issn = "0196-206X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Bayley scales of infant development II

T2 - Where to start?

AU - Gauthier, Susan M.

AU - Bauer, Charles R

AU - Messinger, Daniel S

AU - Closius, Janine M.

PY - 1999/4/1

Y1 - 1999/4/1

N2 - This study examines whether the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (Bayley II) Mental Scale scores vary on the basis of which item set is considered the starting point of an infant's assessment The Bayley II was administered to 78 12-month-old infants by certified examiners beginning with the 12-month age item set. A second certified examiner then administered 10 additional items that completed the 11-month and 13-month age item sets. Of the 78 infants tested, 73 (94%) met basal and ceiling criteria in all three item sets. Three separate Mental Developmental Index (MDI) scores were calculated using 12-month norms for each subject, which were based on the raw scores generated from the 11-, 12-, and 13-month age item sets Scores calculated on the 11-month set were significantly lower than those on the 12-month set, which were in turn significantly lower than those on the 13-month set. When tested on the 11-month instead of on the 12-month item set, twice as many infants received lower than normal (<85) MDI scores, indicating an impact on referability decisions. Minor adjustments in administration of the Bayley II, such as those based on assumptions regarding an infant's current level of functioning, significantly affect infant test scores and eligibility for follow-up services. Standardized use of this test should minimize variability in test scores. J Dev Behav Pediatr 20:75-79, 1999.

AB - This study examines whether the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (Bayley II) Mental Scale scores vary on the basis of which item set is considered the starting point of an infant's assessment The Bayley II was administered to 78 12-month-old infants by certified examiners beginning with the 12-month age item set. A second certified examiner then administered 10 additional items that completed the 11-month and 13-month age item sets. Of the 78 infants tested, 73 (94%) met basal and ceiling criteria in all three item sets. Three separate Mental Developmental Index (MDI) scores were calculated using 12-month norms for each subject, which were based on the raw scores generated from the 11-, 12-, and 13-month age item sets Scores calculated on the 11-month set were significantly lower than those on the 12-month set, which were in turn significantly lower than those on the 13-month set. When tested on the 11-month instead of on the 12-month item set, twice as many infants received lower than normal (<85) MDI scores, indicating an impact on referability decisions. Minor adjustments in administration of the Bayley II, such as those based on assumptions regarding an infant's current level of functioning, significantly affect infant test scores and eligibility for follow-up services. Standardized use of this test should minimize variability in test scores. J Dev Behav Pediatr 20:75-79, 1999.

KW - Administration

KW - Bayley II

KW - Bias

KW - Development

KW - Mental

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033110903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033110903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 75

EP - 79

JO - Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics

JF - Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics

SN - 0196-206X

IS - 2

ER -