Test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire

Aaron R. Folsom, David R. Jacobs, Carl J. Caspersen, Orlando Gomez-Marin, Joan Knudsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

140 Scopus citations

Abstract

The test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire was assessed by two administrations of the questionnaire at a five-week interval in 140 adults from a general population sample and at a two-week interval in 150 male participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). In both study populations, there was a slight, nonsignificant drop in reported leisure time energy expenditure between the test and the retest. The largest test-retest differences in estimated energy expenditure were found among those reporting greater levels of energy expenditure. Nevertheless, in both study populations Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the test and retest were high-0.79 to 0.88 for total activity and ranging 0.69-0.86 among the light, moderate, and heavy intensity subcategories. The high reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire corroborates its utility in epidemiologic research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)505-511
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Chronic Diseases
Volume39
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Folsom, A. R., Jacobs, D. R., Caspersen, C. J., Gomez-Marin, O., & Knudsen, J. (1986). Test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 39(7), 505-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(86)90195-5