Test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire

Aaron R. Folsom, David R. Jacobs, Carl J. Caspersen, Orlando W Gomez-Marin, Joan Knudsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

140 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire was assessed by two administrations of the questionnaire at a five-week interval in 140 adults from a general population sample and at a two-week interval in 150 male participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). In both study populations, there was a slight, nonsignificant drop in reported leisure time energy expenditure between the test and the retest. The largest test-retest differences in estimated energy expenditure were found among those reporting greater levels of energy expenditure. Nevertheless, in both study populations Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the test and retest were high-0.79 to 0.88 for total activity and ranging 0.69-0.86 among the light, moderate, and heavy intensity subcategories. The high reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire corroborates its utility in epidemiologic research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)505-511
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Chronic Diseases
Volume39
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Leisure Activities
Reproducibility of Results
Energy Metabolism
Population
Nonparametric Statistics
Light
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Folsom, A. R., Jacobs, D. R., Caspersen, C. J., Gomez-Marin, O. W., & Knudsen, J. (1986). Test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 39(7), 505-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(86)90195-5

Test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire. / Folsom, Aaron R.; Jacobs, David R.; Caspersen, Carl J.; Gomez-Marin, Orlando W; Knudsen, Joan.

In: Journal of Chronic Diseases, Vol. 39, No. 7, 01.01.1986, p. 505-511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Folsom, AR, Jacobs, DR, Caspersen, CJ, Gomez-Marin, OW & Knudsen, J 1986, 'Test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire', Journal of Chronic Diseases, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 505-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(86)90195-5
Folsom, Aaron R. ; Jacobs, David R. ; Caspersen, Carl J. ; Gomez-Marin, Orlando W ; Knudsen, Joan. / Test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire. In: Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1986 ; Vol. 39, No. 7. pp. 505-511.
@article{678af1a1fe6849ceaf10e0ec4e9ca5fb,
title = "Test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire",
abstract = "The test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire was assessed by two administrations of the questionnaire at a five-week interval in 140 adults from a general population sample and at a two-week interval in 150 male participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). In both study populations, there was a slight, nonsignificant drop in reported leisure time energy expenditure between the test and the retest. The largest test-retest differences in estimated energy expenditure were found among those reporting greater levels of energy expenditure. Nevertheless, in both study populations Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the test and retest were high-0.79 to 0.88 for total activity and ranging 0.69-0.86 among the light, moderate, and heavy intensity subcategories. The high reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire corroborates its utility in epidemiologic research.",
author = "Folsom, {Aaron R.} and Jacobs, {David R.} and Caspersen, {Carl J.} and Gomez-Marin, {Orlando W} and Joan Knudsen",
year = "1986",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0021-9681(86)90195-5",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "505--511",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire

AU - Folsom, Aaron R.

AU - Jacobs, David R.

AU - Caspersen, Carl J.

AU - Gomez-Marin, Orlando W

AU - Knudsen, Joan

PY - 1986/1/1

Y1 - 1986/1/1

N2 - The test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire was assessed by two administrations of the questionnaire at a five-week interval in 140 adults from a general population sample and at a two-week interval in 150 male participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). In both study populations, there was a slight, nonsignificant drop in reported leisure time energy expenditure between the test and the retest. The largest test-retest differences in estimated energy expenditure were found among those reporting greater levels of energy expenditure. Nevertheless, in both study populations Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the test and retest were high-0.79 to 0.88 for total activity and ranging 0.69-0.86 among the light, moderate, and heavy intensity subcategories. The high reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire corroborates its utility in epidemiologic research.

AB - The test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire was assessed by two administrations of the questionnaire at a five-week interval in 140 adults from a general population sample and at a two-week interval in 150 male participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). In both study populations, there was a slight, nonsignificant drop in reported leisure time energy expenditure between the test and the retest. The largest test-retest differences in estimated energy expenditure were found among those reporting greater levels of energy expenditure. Nevertheless, in both study populations Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the test and retest were high-0.79 to 0.88 for total activity and ranging 0.69-0.86 among the light, moderate, and heavy intensity subcategories. The high reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire corroborates its utility in epidemiologic research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022456068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022456068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90195-5

DO - 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90195-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 3722314

AN - SCOPUS:0022456068

VL - 39

SP - 505

EP - 511

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 7

ER -