Ten-year review of BMW Accident Research Program–investigated cases

Janet Bahouth, Kelly Withum, George Bahouth, Kennerly Digges, James Stratton, Rebecca Spicer, Fabian Steinhauser, Peter Baur, Carl Schulman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Over the past 10 years, the BMW Accident Research Program (ARP) has investigated how and why occupants are injured in motor vehicle crashes by reconstructing the crash. This research discusses the 2006–2017 ARP case study methodology and comprehensively describes the cases investigated over the past decade. Methods: Accident research program cases are selected according to emerging trends and issues identified by BMW. Driver interviews, inspection approvals, police reports, and medical records are obtained. ARP case investigations involve a multidisciplinary team of engineers, automobile crash experts, and a trauma team. For each case, the team reconstructs the crash and explores in detail the crash characteristics, injury outcomes, as well as case significance and countermeasures that could have prevented the crash or mitigated the severity of the crash or injuries sustained. Results: The ARP investigated 476 BMW-involved crashes between 2006 and 2017 in the United States. The majority of the crash investigations involved a frontal crash (55%). The other crash types included rollover (17%), nearside (13%), farside (9%), and rear crashes (5%). Crash characteristics such as roadway departure (26%), fatality (8%), elderly (>65 years old) occupant crashes (7%), crashes preceded by a medical event (4%), and crashes preceded by the driver falling asleep at the wheel (4%) are particularly informative in regards to advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) role. The distribution of Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS) scores for the occupants were AIS 1 (23%), AIS 2 (33%), AIS 3 (10%), AIS 4 (4%), and AIS 5 + (7%); 16% of crashes involved uninjured occupants and 7% included no injury information. Conclusions: In-depth case reviews of moderate and severe crashes remain vital to determine emerging trends, patterns of crash injury, and analysis of driver assistance systems and other factors with potential to prevent the crash or limit severity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S145-S146
JournalTraffic Injury Prevention
Volume19
Issue numbersup2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 21 2018

Fingerprint

accident research
Accidents
driver
Research
Wounds and Injuries
motor vehicle
assistance
Abbreviated Injury Scale
Advanced driver assistance systems
trend
Automobiles
Police
Law enforcement
Motor Vehicles
trauma
engineer
police
Medical Records
expert
Wheels

Keywords

  • blunt trauma
  • Crash database
  • crash reconstruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety Research
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Bahouth, J., Withum, K., Bahouth, G., Digges, K., Stratton, J., Spicer, R., ... Schulman, C. (2018). Ten-year review of BMW Accident Research Program–investigated cases. Traffic Injury Prevention, 19(sup2), S145-S146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1532206

Ten-year review of BMW Accident Research Program–investigated cases. / Bahouth, Janet; Withum, Kelly; Bahouth, George; Digges, Kennerly; Stratton, James; Spicer, Rebecca; Steinhauser, Fabian; Baur, Peter; Schulman, Carl.

In: Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 19, No. sup2, 21.03.2018, p. S145-S146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bahouth, J, Withum, K, Bahouth, G, Digges, K, Stratton, J, Spicer, R, Steinhauser, F, Baur, P & Schulman, C 2018, 'Ten-year review of BMW Accident Research Program–investigated cases', Traffic Injury Prevention, vol. 19, no. sup2, pp. S145-S146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1532206
Bahouth J, Withum K, Bahouth G, Digges K, Stratton J, Spicer R et al. Ten-year review of BMW Accident Research Program–investigated cases. Traffic Injury Prevention. 2018 Mar 21;19(sup2):S145-S146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1532206
Bahouth, Janet ; Withum, Kelly ; Bahouth, George ; Digges, Kennerly ; Stratton, James ; Spicer, Rebecca ; Steinhauser, Fabian ; Baur, Peter ; Schulman, Carl. / Ten-year review of BMW Accident Research Program–investigated cases. In: Traffic Injury Prevention. 2018 ; Vol. 19, No. sup2. pp. S145-S146.
@article{c3a3d40ab4b94211b254e70e61ca063e,
title = "Ten-year review of BMW Accident Research Program–investigated cases",
abstract = "Objective: Over the past 10 years, the BMW Accident Research Program (ARP) has investigated how and why occupants are injured in motor vehicle crashes by reconstructing the crash. This research discusses the 2006–2017 ARP case study methodology and comprehensively describes the cases investigated over the past decade. Methods: Accident research program cases are selected according to emerging trends and issues identified by BMW. Driver interviews, inspection approvals, police reports, and medical records are obtained. ARP case investigations involve a multidisciplinary team of engineers, automobile crash experts, and a trauma team. For each case, the team reconstructs the crash and explores in detail the crash characteristics, injury outcomes, as well as case significance and countermeasures that could have prevented the crash or mitigated the severity of the crash or injuries sustained. Results: The ARP investigated 476 BMW-involved crashes between 2006 and 2017 in the United States. The majority of the crash investigations involved a frontal crash (55{\%}). The other crash types included rollover (17{\%}), nearside (13{\%}), farside (9{\%}), and rear crashes (5{\%}). Crash characteristics such as roadway departure (26{\%}), fatality (8{\%}), elderly (>65 years old) occupant crashes (7{\%}), crashes preceded by a medical event (4{\%}), and crashes preceded by the driver falling asleep at the wheel (4{\%}) are particularly informative in regards to advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) role. The distribution of Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS) scores for the occupants were AIS 1 (23{\%}), AIS 2 (33{\%}), AIS 3 (10{\%}), AIS 4 (4{\%}), and AIS 5 + (7{\%}); 16{\%} of crashes involved uninjured occupants and 7{\%} included no injury information. Conclusions: In-depth case reviews of moderate and severe crashes remain vital to determine emerging trends, patterns of crash injury, and analysis of driver assistance systems and other factors with potential to prevent the crash or limit severity.",
keywords = "blunt trauma, Crash database, crash reconstruction",
author = "Janet Bahouth and Kelly Withum and George Bahouth and Kennerly Digges and James Stratton and Rebecca Spicer and Fabian Steinhauser and Peter Baur and Carl Schulman",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1080/15389588.2018.1532206",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "S145--S146",
journal = "Traffic Injury Prevention",
issn = "1538-9588",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "sup2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ten-year review of BMW Accident Research Program–investigated cases

AU - Bahouth, Janet

AU - Withum, Kelly

AU - Bahouth, George

AU - Digges, Kennerly

AU - Stratton, James

AU - Spicer, Rebecca

AU - Steinhauser, Fabian

AU - Baur, Peter

AU - Schulman, Carl

PY - 2018/3/21

Y1 - 2018/3/21

N2 - Objective: Over the past 10 years, the BMW Accident Research Program (ARP) has investigated how and why occupants are injured in motor vehicle crashes by reconstructing the crash. This research discusses the 2006–2017 ARP case study methodology and comprehensively describes the cases investigated over the past decade. Methods: Accident research program cases are selected according to emerging trends and issues identified by BMW. Driver interviews, inspection approvals, police reports, and medical records are obtained. ARP case investigations involve a multidisciplinary team of engineers, automobile crash experts, and a trauma team. For each case, the team reconstructs the crash and explores in detail the crash characteristics, injury outcomes, as well as case significance and countermeasures that could have prevented the crash or mitigated the severity of the crash or injuries sustained. Results: The ARP investigated 476 BMW-involved crashes between 2006 and 2017 in the United States. The majority of the crash investigations involved a frontal crash (55%). The other crash types included rollover (17%), nearside (13%), farside (9%), and rear crashes (5%). Crash characteristics such as roadway departure (26%), fatality (8%), elderly (>65 years old) occupant crashes (7%), crashes preceded by a medical event (4%), and crashes preceded by the driver falling asleep at the wheel (4%) are particularly informative in regards to advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) role. The distribution of Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS) scores for the occupants were AIS 1 (23%), AIS 2 (33%), AIS 3 (10%), AIS 4 (4%), and AIS 5 + (7%); 16% of crashes involved uninjured occupants and 7% included no injury information. Conclusions: In-depth case reviews of moderate and severe crashes remain vital to determine emerging trends, patterns of crash injury, and analysis of driver assistance systems and other factors with potential to prevent the crash or limit severity.

AB - Objective: Over the past 10 years, the BMW Accident Research Program (ARP) has investigated how and why occupants are injured in motor vehicle crashes by reconstructing the crash. This research discusses the 2006–2017 ARP case study methodology and comprehensively describes the cases investigated over the past decade. Methods: Accident research program cases are selected according to emerging trends and issues identified by BMW. Driver interviews, inspection approvals, police reports, and medical records are obtained. ARP case investigations involve a multidisciplinary team of engineers, automobile crash experts, and a trauma team. For each case, the team reconstructs the crash and explores in detail the crash characteristics, injury outcomes, as well as case significance and countermeasures that could have prevented the crash or mitigated the severity of the crash or injuries sustained. Results: The ARP investigated 476 BMW-involved crashes between 2006 and 2017 in the United States. The majority of the crash investigations involved a frontal crash (55%). The other crash types included rollover (17%), nearside (13%), farside (9%), and rear crashes (5%). Crash characteristics such as roadway departure (26%), fatality (8%), elderly (>65 years old) occupant crashes (7%), crashes preceded by a medical event (4%), and crashes preceded by the driver falling asleep at the wheel (4%) are particularly informative in regards to advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) role. The distribution of Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS) scores for the occupants were AIS 1 (23%), AIS 2 (33%), AIS 3 (10%), AIS 4 (4%), and AIS 5 + (7%); 16% of crashes involved uninjured occupants and 7% included no injury information. Conclusions: In-depth case reviews of moderate and severe crashes remain vital to determine emerging trends, patterns of crash injury, and analysis of driver assistance systems and other factors with potential to prevent the crash or limit severity.

KW - blunt trauma

KW - Crash database

KW - crash reconstruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062605464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062605464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15389588.2018.1532206

DO - 10.1080/15389588.2018.1532206

M3 - Article

C2 - 30841809

AN - SCOPUS:85062605464

VL - 19

SP - S145-S146

JO - Traffic Injury Prevention

JF - Traffic Injury Prevention

SN - 1538-9588

IS - sup2

ER -