Technology

Is There Sufficient Evidence to Change Practice in Point-of-Care Management of Coagulopathy?

Michael Fabbro, Anne M. Winkler, Jerrold H. Levy

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Currently, hemostasis is one of the most widely researched topics in perioperative medicine. As investigators learn more about the complexity of coagulation, developing tests with the ability to rapidly monitor coagulation and guide targeted therapy is the key to optimizing hemostasis management. There is mounting evidence that algorithmic transfusion using point-of-care (POC) testing can reduce red cell and platelet transfusions and major bleeding after cardiac surgery. Integrating these tests during cardiac surgery and trauma management is especially important because these groups use the most blood products within a health system and the risks of transfusion are well documented. Currently, numerous POC tests are available for evaluating hemostasis. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the current evidence surrounding the most common POC testing devices in practice for managing coagulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1849-1856
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Point-of-Care Systems
Hemostasis
Technology
Thoracic Surgery
Platelet Transfusion
Research Personnel
Medicine
Hemorrhage
Equipment and Supplies
Health
Wounds and Injuries
Point-of-Care Testing
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Blood transfusion
  • Coagulation tests
  • Coagulopathy
  • Hemostasis
  • Platelet function assays
  • Point of care tests
  • Viscoelastic testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Technology : Is There Sufficient Evidence to Change Practice in Point-of-Care Management of Coagulopathy? / Fabbro, Michael; Winkler, Anne M.; Levy, Jerrold H.

In: Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Vol. 31, No. 5, 01.10.2017, p. 1849-1856.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{7696c133705f4bea9a7c4616d30cbd80,
title = "Technology: Is There Sufficient Evidence to Change Practice in Point-of-Care Management of Coagulopathy?",
abstract = "Currently, hemostasis is one of the most widely researched topics in perioperative medicine. As investigators learn more about the complexity of coagulation, developing tests with the ability to rapidly monitor coagulation and guide targeted therapy is the key to optimizing hemostasis management. There is mounting evidence that algorithmic transfusion using point-of-care (POC) testing can reduce red cell and platelet transfusions and major bleeding after cardiac surgery. Integrating these tests during cardiac surgery and trauma management is especially important because these groups use the most blood products within a health system and the risks of transfusion are well documented. Currently, numerous POC tests are available for evaluating hemostasis. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the current evidence surrounding the most common POC testing devices in practice for managing coagulation.",
keywords = "Blood transfusion, Coagulation tests, Coagulopathy, Hemostasis, Platelet function assays, Point of care tests, Viscoelastic testing",
author = "Michael Fabbro and Winkler, {Anne M.} and Levy, {Jerrold H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/j.jvca.2017.05.037",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "1849--1856",
journal = "Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia",
issn = "1053-0770",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technology

T2 - Is There Sufficient Evidence to Change Practice in Point-of-Care Management of Coagulopathy?

AU - Fabbro, Michael

AU - Winkler, Anne M.

AU - Levy, Jerrold H.

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Currently, hemostasis is one of the most widely researched topics in perioperative medicine. As investigators learn more about the complexity of coagulation, developing tests with the ability to rapidly monitor coagulation and guide targeted therapy is the key to optimizing hemostasis management. There is mounting evidence that algorithmic transfusion using point-of-care (POC) testing can reduce red cell and platelet transfusions and major bleeding after cardiac surgery. Integrating these tests during cardiac surgery and trauma management is especially important because these groups use the most blood products within a health system and the risks of transfusion are well documented. Currently, numerous POC tests are available for evaluating hemostasis. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the current evidence surrounding the most common POC testing devices in practice for managing coagulation.

AB - Currently, hemostasis is one of the most widely researched topics in perioperative medicine. As investigators learn more about the complexity of coagulation, developing tests with the ability to rapidly monitor coagulation and guide targeted therapy is the key to optimizing hemostasis management. There is mounting evidence that algorithmic transfusion using point-of-care (POC) testing can reduce red cell and platelet transfusions and major bleeding after cardiac surgery. Integrating these tests during cardiac surgery and trauma management is especially important because these groups use the most blood products within a health system and the risks of transfusion are well documented. Currently, numerous POC tests are available for evaluating hemostasis. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the current evidence surrounding the most common POC testing devices in practice for managing coagulation.

KW - Blood transfusion

KW - Coagulation tests

KW - Coagulopathy

KW - Hemostasis

KW - Platelet function assays

KW - Point of care tests

KW - Viscoelastic testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027968066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027968066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.05.037

DO - 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.05.037

M3 - Review article

VL - 31

SP - 1849

EP - 1856

JO - Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

SN - 1053-0770

IS - 5

ER -