Technical considerations for dominant frequency analysis

Jason Ng, Alan H. Kadish, Jeffrey Goldberger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Considerations for Dominant Frequency Analysis. Introduction: Dominant frequency (DF) analysis of atrial electrograms has been used to characterize atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to explore technical issues that may affect the estimation of local activation rate during AF using DF analysis. Methods and Results: Epicardial atrial electrograms recorded during AF from 10 dogs were used to evaluate the effects of unipolar versus bipolar recordings, bipolar electrode spacing, postrecording processing, far field ventricular depolarizations, ventricular template subtraction, and signal duration on DF analysis. Simulated electrograms were used to evaluate the effect of far field ventricular depolarizations and signal-to-noise ratio. DFs were compared with activation rates obtained by manual marking and the reproducibility of the DFs was evaluated. Bipolar electrograms were found to be preferable to unipolar electrograms. Preprocessing was a necessary step for bipolar signals, but also aided analysis of unipolar recordings. Ventricular far field depolarizations significantly affected DFs. Ventricular template subtraction helped DF analysis in signals with both minimal and significant ventricular components. A recording duration above 2 seconds was required for reliable DF measurements. Signal-to-noise ratios below 13 dB could also affect DF, particularly for signals with significant amplitude and frequency variation. Conclusions: Various factors affect DF analysis. Proper interpretation of DF analysis requires careful evaluation of the AF signals and robust processing techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)757-764
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Atrial Fibrillation
Cardiac Electrophysiologic Techniques
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Electrodes
Dogs

Keywords

  • Arrhythmia
  • Dominant frequency
  • Electrograms
  • Fibrillation
  • Spectral analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology

Cite this

Technical considerations for dominant frequency analysis. / Ng, Jason; Kadish, Alan H.; Goldberger, Jeffrey.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Vol. 18, No. 7, 01.07.2007, p. 757-764.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2d478e8c1a0942ccb22ab2fbd2c7574a,
title = "Technical considerations for dominant frequency analysis",
abstract = "Considerations for Dominant Frequency Analysis. Introduction: Dominant frequency (DF) analysis of atrial electrograms has been used to characterize atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to explore technical issues that may affect the estimation of local activation rate during AF using DF analysis. Methods and Results: Epicardial atrial electrograms recorded during AF from 10 dogs were used to evaluate the effects of unipolar versus bipolar recordings, bipolar electrode spacing, postrecording processing, far field ventricular depolarizations, ventricular template subtraction, and signal duration on DF analysis. Simulated electrograms were used to evaluate the effect of far field ventricular depolarizations and signal-to-noise ratio. DFs were compared with activation rates obtained by manual marking and the reproducibility of the DFs was evaluated. Bipolar electrograms were found to be preferable to unipolar electrograms. Preprocessing was a necessary step for bipolar signals, but also aided analysis of unipolar recordings. Ventricular far field depolarizations significantly affected DFs. Ventricular template subtraction helped DF analysis in signals with both minimal and significant ventricular components. A recording duration above 2 seconds was required for reliable DF measurements. Signal-to-noise ratios below 13 dB could also affect DF, particularly for signals with significant amplitude and frequency variation. Conclusions: Various factors affect DF analysis. Proper interpretation of DF analysis requires careful evaluation of the AF signals and robust processing techniques.",
keywords = "Arrhythmia, Dominant frequency, Electrograms, Fibrillation, Spectral analysis",
author = "Jason Ng and Kadish, {Alan H.} and Jeffrey Goldberger",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00810.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "757--764",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology",
issn = "1045-3873",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technical considerations for dominant frequency analysis

AU - Ng, Jason

AU - Kadish, Alan H.

AU - Goldberger, Jeffrey

PY - 2007/7/1

Y1 - 2007/7/1

N2 - Considerations for Dominant Frequency Analysis. Introduction: Dominant frequency (DF) analysis of atrial electrograms has been used to characterize atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to explore technical issues that may affect the estimation of local activation rate during AF using DF analysis. Methods and Results: Epicardial atrial electrograms recorded during AF from 10 dogs were used to evaluate the effects of unipolar versus bipolar recordings, bipolar electrode spacing, postrecording processing, far field ventricular depolarizations, ventricular template subtraction, and signal duration on DF analysis. Simulated electrograms were used to evaluate the effect of far field ventricular depolarizations and signal-to-noise ratio. DFs were compared with activation rates obtained by manual marking and the reproducibility of the DFs was evaluated. Bipolar electrograms were found to be preferable to unipolar electrograms. Preprocessing was a necessary step for bipolar signals, but also aided analysis of unipolar recordings. Ventricular far field depolarizations significantly affected DFs. Ventricular template subtraction helped DF analysis in signals with both minimal and significant ventricular components. A recording duration above 2 seconds was required for reliable DF measurements. Signal-to-noise ratios below 13 dB could also affect DF, particularly for signals with significant amplitude and frequency variation. Conclusions: Various factors affect DF analysis. Proper interpretation of DF analysis requires careful evaluation of the AF signals and robust processing techniques.

AB - Considerations for Dominant Frequency Analysis. Introduction: Dominant frequency (DF) analysis of atrial electrograms has been used to characterize atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to explore technical issues that may affect the estimation of local activation rate during AF using DF analysis. Methods and Results: Epicardial atrial electrograms recorded during AF from 10 dogs were used to evaluate the effects of unipolar versus bipolar recordings, bipolar electrode spacing, postrecording processing, far field ventricular depolarizations, ventricular template subtraction, and signal duration on DF analysis. Simulated electrograms were used to evaluate the effect of far field ventricular depolarizations and signal-to-noise ratio. DFs were compared with activation rates obtained by manual marking and the reproducibility of the DFs was evaluated. Bipolar electrograms were found to be preferable to unipolar electrograms. Preprocessing was a necessary step for bipolar signals, but also aided analysis of unipolar recordings. Ventricular far field depolarizations significantly affected DFs. Ventricular template subtraction helped DF analysis in signals with both minimal and significant ventricular components. A recording duration above 2 seconds was required for reliable DF measurements. Signal-to-noise ratios below 13 dB could also affect DF, particularly for signals with significant amplitude and frequency variation. Conclusions: Various factors affect DF analysis. Proper interpretation of DF analysis requires careful evaluation of the AF signals and robust processing techniques.

KW - Arrhythmia

KW - Dominant frequency

KW - Electrograms

KW - Fibrillation

KW - Spectral analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250677541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250677541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00810.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00810.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 17578346

AN - SCOPUS:34250677541

VL - 18

SP - 757

EP - 764

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

SN - 1045-3873

IS - 7

ER -