Surgical treatment of spinal ependymoma and post-operative radiotherapy

T. T. Lee, E. B. Gromelski, Barth A Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction. With the advances in microsurgical and monitoring techniques, spinal ependymomas are gross totally resected more frequently. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy has become questionable with gross total resection and its role for residual neoplasm need to be redefined. A retrospective analysis of a series of patients was carried out to investigate our clinical outcome and selected use of postoperative radiotherapy. Clinical materials and methods. Between July 1990 and May 1995, nineteen patients [M:F = 12:7; age range: 21 to 71 years] with a spinal ependymoma were treated at University of Miami by the senior author. (BAG). Pre-operative MRI diagnosed the intraspinal tumor, and pathology reports demonstrated that each patient had a histologically confirmed ependymoma. At the time of diagnosis, the most common symptoms presented were pain (in 16 patients = 84.2%). The pattern of progression of clinical symptoms was directly related to the location of the tumor. Each patient had an MRI immediately after surgery, approximately 6 months post-operatively, and then annually. Results. All 19 patients underwent intradural microsurgical exploration with an attempted gross total resection (achieved in 16 patients = 79%) of the ependymoma through a posterior approach. Direct neural tissue stimulation halted further resection in 2 patients with questionable tumor margins. Radiation therapy was employed as a surgical adjunct in 3 patients (15.8%) because of possible residual tumor. All patients were followed up postoperatively for an average of 50.6 months (range 6 months to 6 years). All patients are surviving to date. Surgical resection of these tumors led to significant alleviation of pre-operative symptoms. There has been no radiographic evidence of tumor recurrence or growth in any patient to date. Conclusion. Surgical resection of spinal ependymoma leads to significant improvement of pre-operative symptom. Surgical removal alone, with an attempt to grossly resect the tumor, should be the treatment of choice, with careful clinical and radiographic follow-up. Radiation therapy should only be considered as a surgical adjunct where gross total resection is not achieved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)309-313
Number of pages5
JournalActa Neurochirurgica
Volume140
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Ependymoma
Radiotherapy
Tumors
radiation therapy
tumors
Magnetic resonance imaging
Therapeutics
Neoplasms
Residual Neoplasm
Pathology
Surgery
neoplasms
Adjuvant Radiotherapy
Tissue
pathology
stimulation
Monitoring
surgery
progressions
margins

Keywords

  • Radiotherapy
  • Spinal ependymoma
  • Surgical excision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Surgical treatment of spinal ependymoma and post-operative radiotherapy. / Lee, T. T.; Gromelski, E. B.; Green, Barth A.

In: Acta Neurochirurgica, Vol. 140, No. 4, 01.01.1998, p. 309-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, T. T. ; Gromelski, E. B. ; Green, Barth A. / Surgical treatment of spinal ependymoma and post-operative radiotherapy. In: Acta Neurochirurgica. 1998 ; Vol. 140, No. 4. pp. 309-313.
@article{23f41b0889294c818f1e026a40315e78,
title = "Surgical treatment of spinal ependymoma and post-operative radiotherapy",
abstract = "Introduction. With the advances in microsurgical and monitoring techniques, spinal ependymomas are gross totally resected more frequently. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy has become questionable with gross total resection and its role for residual neoplasm need to be redefined. A retrospective analysis of a series of patients was carried out to investigate our clinical outcome and selected use of postoperative radiotherapy. Clinical materials and methods. Between July 1990 and May 1995, nineteen patients [M:F = 12:7; age range: 21 to 71 years] with a spinal ependymoma were treated at University of Miami by the senior author. (BAG). Pre-operative MRI diagnosed the intraspinal tumor, and pathology reports demonstrated that each patient had a histologically confirmed ependymoma. At the time of diagnosis, the most common symptoms presented were pain (in 16 patients = 84.2{\%}). The pattern of progression of clinical symptoms was directly related to the location of the tumor. Each patient had an MRI immediately after surgery, approximately 6 months post-operatively, and then annually. Results. All 19 patients underwent intradural microsurgical exploration with an attempted gross total resection (achieved in 16 patients = 79{\%}) of the ependymoma through a posterior approach. Direct neural tissue stimulation halted further resection in 2 patients with questionable tumor margins. Radiation therapy was employed as a surgical adjunct in 3 patients (15.8{\%}) because of possible residual tumor. All patients were followed up postoperatively for an average of 50.6 months (range 6 months to 6 years). All patients are surviving to date. Surgical resection of these tumors led to significant alleviation of pre-operative symptoms. There has been no radiographic evidence of tumor recurrence or growth in any patient to date. Conclusion. Surgical resection of spinal ependymoma leads to significant improvement of pre-operative symptom. Surgical removal alone, with an attempt to grossly resect the tumor, should be the treatment of choice, with careful clinical and radiographic follow-up. Radiation therapy should only be considered as a surgical adjunct where gross total resection is not achieved.",
keywords = "Radiotherapy, Spinal ependymoma, Surgical excision",
author = "Lee, {T. T.} and Gromelski, {E. B.} and Green, {Barth A}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s007010050103",
language = "English",
volume = "140",
pages = "309--313",
journal = "Scientific Computing and Instrumentation",
issn = "1078-8956",
publisher = "Springer Wien",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical treatment of spinal ependymoma and post-operative radiotherapy

AU - Lee, T. T.

AU - Gromelski, E. B.

AU - Green, Barth A

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Introduction. With the advances in microsurgical and monitoring techniques, spinal ependymomas are gross totally resected more frequently. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy has become questionable with gross total resection and its role for residual neoplasm need to be redefined. A retrospective analysis of a series of patients was carried out to investigate our clinical outcome and selected use of postoperative radiotherapy. Clinical materials and methods. Between July 1990 and May 1995, nineteen patients [M:F = 12:7; age range: 21 to 71 years] with a spinal ependymoma were treated at University of Miami by the senior author. (BAG). Pre-operative MRI diagnosed the intraspinal tumor, and pathology reports demonstrated that each patient had a histologically confirmed ependymoma. At the time of diagnosis, the most common symptoms presented were pain (in 16 patients = 84.2%). The pattern of progression of clinical symptoms was directly related to the location of the tumor. Each patient had an MRI immediately after surgery, approximately 6 months post-operatively, and then annually. Results. All 19 patients underwent intradural microsurgical exploration with an attempted gross total resection (achieved in 16 patients = 79%) of the ependymoma through a posterior approach. Direct neural tissue stimulation halted further resection in 2 patients with questionable tumor margins. Radiation therapy was employed as a surgical adjunct in 3 patients (15.8%) because of possible residual tumor. All patients were followed up postoperatively for an average of 50.6 months (range 6 months to 6 years). All patients are surviving to date. Surgical resection of these tumors led to significant alleviation of pre-operative symptoms. There has been no radiographic evidence of tumor recurrence or growth in any patient to date. Conclusion. Surgical resection of spinal ependymoma leads to significant improvement of pre-operative symptom. Surgical removal alone, with an attempt to grossly resect the tumor, should be the treatment of choice, with careful clinical and radiographic follow-up. Radiation therapy should only be considered as a surgical adjunct where gross total resection is not achieved.

AB - Introduction. With the advances in microsurgical and monitoring techniques, spinal ependymomas are gross totally resected more frequently. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy has become questionable with gross total resection and its role for residual neoplasm need to be redefined. A retrospective analysis of a series of patients was carried out to investigate our clinical outcome and selected use of postoperative radiotherapy. Clinical materials and methods. Between July 1990 and May 1995, nineteen patients [M:F = 12:7; age range: 21 to 71 years] with a spinal ependymoma were treated at University of Miami by the senior author. (BAG). Pre-operative MRI diagnosed the intraspinal tumor, and pathology reports demonstrated that each patient had a histologically confirmed ependymoma. At the time of diagnosis, the most common symptoms presented were pain (in 16 patients = 84.2%). The pattern of progression of clinical symptoms was directly related to the location of the tumor. Each patient had an MRI immediately after surgery, approximately 6 months post-operatively, and then annually. Results. All 19 patients underwent intradural microsurgical exploration with an attempted gross total resection (achieved in 16 patients = 79%) of the ependymoma through a posterior approach. Direct neural tissue stimulation halted further resection in 2 patients with questionable tumor margins. Radiation therapy was employed as a surgical adjunct in 3 patients (15.8%) because of possible residual tumor. All patients were followed up postoperatively for an average of 50.6 months (range 6 months to 6 years). All patients are surviving to date. Surgical resection of these tumors led to significant alleviation of pre-operative symptoms. There has been no radiographic evidence of tumor recurrence or growth in any patient to date. Conclusion. Surgical resection of spinal ependymoma leads to significant improvement of pre-operative symptom. Surgical removal alone, with an attempt to grossly resect the tumor, should be the treatment of choice, with careful clinical and radiographic follow-up. Radiation therapy should only be considered as a surgical adjunct where gross total resection is not achieved.

KW - Radiotherapy

KW - Spinal ependymoma

KW - Surgical excision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031803427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031803427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s007010050103

DO - 10.1007/s007010050103

M3 - Article

C2 - 9689321

AN - SCOPUS:0031803427

VL - 140

SP - 309

EP - 313

JO - Scientific Computing and Instrumentation

JF - Scientific Computing and Instrumentation

SN - 1078-8956

IS - 4

ER -