Surgical techniques for zenker's diverticulum: A comparative analysis

Jason Leibowitz, Christopher E. Fundakowski, Marianne Abouyared, Andrew Rivera, Jason Rudman, Ka Ming Lo, Donald Weed, Francisco Civantos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To compare the different modalities for treatment of Zenker's diverticulum and the associated clinical outcomes.

Study Design. Case series with chart review.

Setting. Tertiary care hospital.

Subjects and Methods. Between 1995 and 2011, 164 patients underwent surgery for Zenker's diverticulum (stapler, n = 69; laser, n = 68; open, n = 27). Patient sociodemographics, medical comorbidities, pre- and postoperative subjective dysphagia and regurgitation score, complications, length of stay, time to oral intake, and recurrence were reviewed for each surgical modality.

Results. No statistically significant difference in diverticulum prevalence was associated with age, gender, or treatment group. Mean length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the 3 groups (P = .14). A significant difference in time to oral intake was observed in the laser group compared with the other 2 groups (P = .012). No significant difference in recurrence (P = .21) or complication (P = .12) rates was identified between the 3 groups. Although all 3 groups demonstrated a significant decrease between preoperative and postoperative dysphagia and regurgitation scores, the degree of improvement was not significant when the 3 groups were compared.

Conclusion. There is no single "best" approach to Zenker's diverticulum. The open, laser, and stapler methods are equally effective and have similar complication rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-58
Number of pages7
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
Volume151
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 27 2014

Fingerprint

Zenker Diverticulum
Length of Stay
Lasers
Deglutition Disorders
Recurrence
Diverticulum
Tertiary Healthcare
Tertiary Care Centers
Comorbidity
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • dysphagia
  • endoscopic
  • laser
  • stapler
  • Zenker's diverticulum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Surgical techniques for zenker's diverticulum : A comparative analysis. / Leibowitz, Jason; Fundakowski, Christopher E.; Abouyared, Marianne; Rivera, Andrew; Rudman, Jason; Lo, Ka Ming; Weed, Donald; Civantos, Francisco.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), Vol. 151, No. 1, 27.07.2014, p. 52-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leibowitz, Jason ; Fundakowski, Christopher E. ; Abouyared, Marianne ; Rivera, Andrew ; Rudman, Jason ; Lo, Ka Ming ; Weed, Donald ; Civantos, Francisco. / Surgical techniques for zenker's diverticulum : A comparative analysis. In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States). 2014 ; Vol. 151, No. 1. pp. 52-58.
@article{d852fabd0e8040dda447021fedb03b5c,
title = "Surgical techniques for zenker's diverticulum: A comparative analysis",
abstract = "Objective. To compare the different modalities for treatment of Zenker's diverticulum and the associated clinical outcomes.Study Design. Case series with chart review.Setting. Tertiary care hospital.Subjects and Methods. Between 1995 and 2011, 164 patients underwent surgery for Zenker's diverticulum (stapler, n = 69; laser, n = 68; open, n = 27). Patient sociodemographics, medical comorbidities, pre- and postoperative subjective dysphagia and regurgitation score, complications, length of stay, time to oral intake, and recurrence were reviewed for each surgical modality.Results. No statistically significant difference in diverticulum prevalence was associated with age, gender, or treatment group. Mean length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the 3 groups (P = .14). A significant difference in time to oral intake was observed in the laser group compared with the other 2 groups (P = .012). No significant difference in recurrence (P = .21) or complication (P = .12) rates was identified between the 3 groups. Although all 3 groups demonstrated a significant decrease between preoperative and postoperative dysphagia and regurgitation scores, the degree of improvement was not significant when the 3 groups were compared.Conclusion. There is no single {"}best{"} approach to Zenker's diverticulum. The open, laser, and stapler methods are equally effective and have similar complication rates.",
keywords = "dysphagia, endoscopic, laser, stapler, Zenker's diverticulum",
author = "Jason Leibowitz and Fundakowski, {Christopher E.} and Marianne Abouyared and Andrew Rivera and Jason Rudman and Lo, {Ka Ming} and Donald Weed and Francisco Civantos",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1177/0194599814529405",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "151",
pages = "52--58",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical techniques for zenker's diverticulum

T2 - A comparative analysis

AU - Leibowitz, Jason

AU - Fundakowski, Christopher E.

AU - Abouyared, Marianne

AU - Rivera, Andrew

AU - Rudman, Jason

AU - Lo, Ka Ming

AU - Weed, Donald

AU - Civantos, Francisco

PY - 2014/7/27

Y1 - 2014/7/27

N2 - Objective. To compare the different modalities for treatment of Zenker's diverticulum and the associated clinical outcomes.Study Design. Case series with chart review.Setting. Tertiary care hospital.Subjects and Methods. Between 1995 and 2011, 164 patients underwent surgery for Zenker's diverticulum (stapler, n = 69; laser, n = 68; open, n = 27). Patient sociodemographics, medical comorbidities, pre- and postoperative subjective dysphagia and regurgitation score, complications, length of stay, time to oral intake, and recurrence were reviewed for each surgical modality.Results. No statistically significant difference in diverticulum prevalence was associated with age, gender, or treatment group. Mean length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the 3 groups (P = .14). A significant difference in time to oral intake was observed in the laser group compared with the other 2 groups (P = .012). No significant difference in recurrence (P = .21) or complication (P = .12) rates was identified between the 3 groups. Although all 3 groups demonstrated a significant decrease between preoperative and postoperative dysphagia and regurgitation scores, the degree of improvement was not significant when the 3 groups were compared.Conclusion. There is no single "best" approach to Zenker's diverticulum. The open, laser, and stapler methods are equally effective and have similar complication rates.

AB - Objective. To compare the different modalities for treatment of Zenker's diverticulum and the associated clinical outcomes.Study Design. Case series with chart review.Setting. Tertiary care hospital.Subjects and Methods. Between 1995 and 2011, 164 patients underwent surgery for Zenker's diverticulum (stapler, n = 69; laser, n = 68; open, n = 27). Patient sociodemographics, medical comorbidities, pre- and postoperative subjective dysphagia and regurgitation score, complications, length of stay, time to oral intake, and recurrence were reviewed for each surgical modality.Results. No statistically significant difference in diverticulum prevalence was associated with age, gender, or treatment group. Mean length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the 3 groups (P = .14). A significant difference in time to oral intake was observed in the laser group compared with the other 2 groups (P = .012). No significant difference in recurrence (P = .21) or complication (P = .12) rates was identified between the 3 groups. Although all 3 groups demonstrated a significant decrease between preoperative and postoperative dysphagia and regurgitation scores, the degree of improvement was not significant when the 3 groups were compared.Conclusion. There is no single "best" approach to Zenker's diverticulum. The open, laser, and stapler methods are equally effective and have similar complication rates.

KW - dysphagia

KW - endoscopic

KW - laser

KW - stapler

KW - Zenker's diverticulum

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921737261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921737261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0194599814529405

DO - 10.1177/0194599814529405

M3 - Article

C2 - 24705225

AN - SCOPUS:84921737261

VL - 151

SP - 52

EP - 58

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 1

ER -