Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f2. I. Basic findings in rabbits

Glen K. Martin, Barden B. Stagner, David Jassir, Fred F. Telischi, Brenda L. Lonsbury-Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present study measured interference-response areas (IRAs) for distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) at 2f1-f2, 3f1-2f2, and 2f2-f1. The IRAs were obtained in either awake or anesthetized rabbits, or in anesthetized guinea pigs and mice, by sweeping the frequencies and levels of an interference tone (IT) around a set of f1 and f2 primary tones, at several fixed frequencies and levels, while plotting the effects of the IT on DPOAE level. An unexpected outcome was the occurrence of regions of suppression and/or enhancement of DPOAE level when the IT was at a frequency slightly less than to more than an octave above f2. The IRA of the 2f1-f2 DPOAE typically displayed a high-frequency (HF) lobe of suppression, while the 2f2-f1 emission often exhibited considerable amounts of enhancement. Moreover, for the 2f2-f1 DPOAE, when enhancement was absent, its IRA usually tuned to a region above f2. Whether or not suppression/enhancement was observed depended upon primary-tone level and frequency separation, as well as on the relative levels of the two primaries. Various physiological manipulations involving anesthesia, eighth-nerve section, diuretic administration, or pure-tone overstimulation showed that these phenomena were of cochlear origin, and were not dependent upon the acoustic reflex or cochlear-efferent activity. The aftereffects of applying diuretics or over-exposures revealed that suppression/enhancement required the presence of sensitive, low-level DPOAE-generator sources. Additionally, suppression/enhancement were general effects in that, in addition to rabbits, they were also observed in mice and guinea pigs. Further, corresponding plots of DPOAE phase often revealed areas of differing phase change in the vicinity of the primary tones as compared to regions above f2. These findings, along with the effects of tonal exposures designed to fatigue regions above f2, and instances in which DPOAE level was dependent upon the amount of suppression/enhancement, suggested that the interactions of two DPOAE-generator sources contributed, in some manner, to these phenomena. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-123
Number of pages19
JournalHearing Research
Volume136
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 1999

Keywords

  • Distortion-product otoacoustic emission
  • Enhancement
  • Interference response area
  • Suppression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sensory Systems

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f<sub>2</sub>. I. Basic findings in rabbits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this