Supervisor-subordinate convergence in descriptions of leader-member exchange (LMX) quality: Review and testable propositions

Xiaohua (Tracy) Zhou, Chester Schriesheim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Theoretical explanations are presented for the poor convergence in supervisor and subordinate leader-member exchange (LMX) descriptions that are commonly reported in the literature. We focus on (1) measurement deficiencies, and (2) differences in supervisor-subordinate perceptions of the LMX construct. Additionally, several other factors (e.g., information-processing styles, attributional biases, etc.) are explored that may explain poor convergence. Testable propositions and suggestions for future research are developed and presented, and the applicability of the explanations to other leadership approaches is considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)920-932
Number of pages13
JournalLeadership Quarterly
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Automatic Data Processing
leader
information processing
leadership
trend
Supervisors
Leader-member exchange
literature
Factors
Information processing

Keywords

  • Differential perception
  • LMX agreement
  • LMX convergence
  • LMX subdimensions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Supervisor-subordinate convergence in descriptions of leader-member exchange (LMX) quality : Review and testable propositions. / Zhou, Xiaohua (Tracy); Schriesheim, Chester.

In: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 6, 12.2009, p. 920-932.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ffec1a9d72084c7ca737d798f9841a1f,
title = "Supervisor-subordinate convergence in descriptions of leader-member exchange (LMX) quality: Review and testable propositions",
abstract = "Theoretical explanations are presented for the poor convergence in supervisor and subordinate leader-member exchange (LMX) descriptions that are commonly reported in the literature. We focus on (1) measurement deficiencies, and (2) differences in supervisor-subordinate perceptions of the LMX construct. Additionally, several other factors (e.g., information-processing styles, attributional biases, etc.) are explored that may explain poor convergence. Testable propositions and suggestions for future research are developed and presented, and the applicability of the explanations to other leadership approaches is considered.",
keywords = "Differential perception, LMX agreement, LMX convergence, LMX subdimensions",
author = "Zhou, {Xiaohua (Tracy)} and Chester Schriesheim",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "920--932",
journal = "Leadership Quarterly",
issn = "1048-9843",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supervisor-subordinate convergence in descriptions of leader-member exchange (LMX) quality

T2 - Review and testable propositions

AU - Zhou, Xiaohua (Tracy)

AU - Schriesheim, Chester

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Theoretical explanations are presented for the poor convergence in supervisor and subordinate leader-member exchange (LMX) descriptions that are commonly reported in the literature. We focus on (1) measurement deficiencies, and (2) differences in supervisor-subordinate perceptions of the LMX construct. Additionally, several other factors (e.g., information-processing styles, attributional biases, etc.) are explored that may explain poor convergence. Testable propositions and suggestions for future research are developed and presented, and the applicability of the explanations to other leadership approaches is considered.

AB - Theoretical explanations are presented for the poor convergence in supervisor and subordinate leader-member exchange (LMX) descriptions that are commonly reported in the literature. We focus on (1) measurement deficiencies, and (2) differences in supervisor-subordinate perceptions of the LMX construct. Additionally, several other factors (e.g., information-processing styles, attributional biases, etc.) are explored that may explain poor convergence. Testable propositions and suggestions for future research are developed and presented, and the applicability of the explanations to other leadership approaches is considered.

KW - Differential perception

KW - LMX agreement

KW - LMX convergence

KW - LMX subdimensions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71949125956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71949125956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:71949125956

VL - 20

SP - 920

EP - 932

JO - Leadership Quarterly

JF - Leadership Quarterly

SN - 1048-9843

IS - 6

ER -