SU‐GG‐T‐313: A Procedure for Standardizing MLC Quality Assurance for Elekta Linacs

K. Yan, Matthew Thomas Studenski, H. Liu, I. Buzurovic, Y. Cui, L. Shabason, A. Harrison, Y. yu, M. Hossain, Y. Xiao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: As specified in TG142, MLC position accuracy needs to be tested on weekly/monthly basis, with 1mm tolerance. This study focuses on developing techniques, hardware and software tools for implementation of MLC QA tests for Elekta Linacs. Material and Methods: This process was tested with an Elekta Synergy S, Beam Modulator™, which has 40 leaf pairs of 4mm width (maximum 16cm×21cm field size). Based on the machine characteristics, two picket‐fence IMRT plans were designed: one has 5 2cm×16cm strips separated by 2cm gap; the other has the same setup with individual leafs intentionally displaced by ±1mm, ±1.2mm, etc. Both plans used 6MV x‐rays and 50MU on each strip. We overcame the limitation of Xio planning system in generating picket‐fence IMRT plan by modifying leaf positions from a DICOM RT plan file. In‐house software was executed to validate the files before imported into Record and Verify system (Mosaiq) for delivery. Radiographic images were acquired using Kodak XV films. The borders of a 16cm×21cm light field were first traced on the film. These reference lines helped reduce the orientation errors during image registration. Two sets of films were exposed with full buildup. After development, each film was digitized with 0.06mm resolution using a high‐resolution scanner. The images were then imported into Matlab. In‐house code was used to detect leafs exceeding the 1mm threshold. Results: The plans were delivered smoothly. Leaf positions in the first image were used as baselines, instead of using reference leaf positions from the same exposure. This reduced systematic errors. After image registration, leafs displacing from the baseline by 16 pixels (1mm) or more were detected. Conclusion: This efficient procedure provides a sufficiently accurate test for MLC positioning reproducibility. It is a simple and straightforward procedure that can be used for routine MLC position checks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Software
X-Rays
Light

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐GG‐T‐313 : A Procedure for Standardizing MLC Quality Assurance for Elekta Linacs. / Yan, K.; Studenski, Matthew Thomas; Liu, H.; Buzurovic, I.; Cui, Y.; Shabason, L.; Harrison, A.; yu, Y.; Hossain, M.; Xiao, Y.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 37, No. 6, 01.01.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yan, K, Studenski, MT, Liu, H, Buzurovic, I, Cui, Y, Shabason, L, Harrison, A, yu, Y, Hossain, M & Xiao, Y 2010, 'SU‐GG‐T‐313: A Procedure for Standardizing MLC Quality Assurance for Elekta Linacs', Medical Physics, vol. 37, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3468709
Yan, K. ; Studenski, Matthew Thomas ; Liu, H. ; Buzurovic, I. ; Cui, Y. ; Shabason, L. ; Harrison, A. ; yu, Y. ; Hossain, M. ; Xiao, Y. / SU‐GG‐T‐313 : A Procedure for Standardizing MLC Quality Assurance for Elekta Linacs. In: Medical Physics. 2010 ; Vol. 37, No. 6.
@article{36e6c5232a414c7b9d12792f3a262834,
title = "SU‐GG‐T‐313: A Procedure for Standardizing MLC Quality Assurance for Elekta Linacs",
abstract = "Purpose: As specified in TG142, MLC position accuracy needs to be tested on weekly/monthly basis, with 1mm tolerance. This study focuses on developing techniques, hardware and software tools for implementation of MLC QA tests for Elekta Linacs. Material and Methods: This process was tested with an Elekta Synergy S, Beam Modulator™, which has 40 leaf pairs of 4mm width (maximum 16cm×21cm field size). Based on the machine characteristics, two picket‐fence IMRT plans were designed: one has 5 2cm×16cm strips separated by 2cm gap; the other has the same setup with individual leafs intentionally displaced by ±1mm, ±1.2mm, etc. Both plans used 6MV x‐rays and 50MU on each strip. We overcame the limitation of Xio planning system in generating picket‐fence IMRT plan by modifying leaf positions from a DICOM RT plan file. In‐house software was executed to validate the files before imported into Record and Verify system (Mosaiq) for delivery. Radiographic images were acquired using Kodak XV films. The borders of a 16cm×21cm light field were first traced on the film. These reference lines helped reduce the orientation errors during image registration. Two sets of films were exposed with full buildup. After development, each film was digitized with 0.06mm resolution using a high‐resolution scanner. The images were then imported into Matlab. In‐house code was used to detect leafs exceeding the 1mm threshold. Results: The plans were delivered smoothly. Leaf positions in the first image were used as baselines, instead of using reference leaf positions from the same exposure. This reduced systematic errors. After image registration, leafs displacing from the baseline by 16 pixels (1mm) or more were detected. Conclusion: This efficient procedure provides a sufficiently accurate test for MLC positioning reproducibility. It is a simple and straightforward procedure that can be used for routine MLC position checks.",
author = "K. Yan and Studenski, {Matthew Thomas} and H. Liu and I. Buzurovic and Y. Cui and L. Shabason and A. Harrison and Y. yu and M. Hossain and Y. Xiao",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.3468709",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐GG‐T‐313

T2 - A Procedure for Standardizing MLC Quality Assurance for Elekta Linacs

AU - Yan, K.

AU - Studenski, Matthew Thomas

AU - Liu, H.

AU - Buzurovic, I.

AU - Cui, Y.

AU - Shabason, L.

AU - Harrison, A.

AU - yu, Y.

AU - Hossain, M.

AU - Xiao, Y.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Purpose: As specified in TG142, MLC position accuracy needs to be tested on weekly/monthly basis, with 1mm tolerance. This study focuses on developing techniques, hardware and software tools for implementation of MLC QA tests for Elekta Linacs. Material and Methods: This process was tested with an Elekta Synergy S, Beam Modulator™, which has 40 leaf pairs of 4mm width (maximum 16cm×21cm field size). Based on the machine characteristics, two picket‐fence IMRT plans were designed: one has 5 2cm×16cm strips separated by 2cm gap; the other has the same setup with individual leafs intentionally displaced by ±1mm, ±1.2mm, etc. Both plans used 6MV x‐rays and 50MU on each strip. We overcame the limitation of Xio planning system in generating picket‐fence IMRT plan by modifying leaf positions from a DICOM RT plan file. In‐house software was executed to validate the files before imported into Record and Verify system (Mosaiq) for delivery. Radiographic images were acquired using Kodak XV films. The borders of a 16cm×21cm light field were first traced on the film. These reference lines helped reduce the orientation errors during image registration. Two sets of films were exposed with full buildup. After development, each film was digitized with 0.06mm resolution using a high‐resolution scanner. The images were then imported into Matlab. In‐house code was used to detect leafs exceeding the 1mm threshold. Results: The plans were delivered smoothly. Leaf positions in the first image were used as baselines, instead of using reference leaf positions from the same exposure. This reduced systematic errors. After image registration, leafs displacing from the baseline by 16 pixels (1mm) or more were detected. Conclusion: This efficient procedure provides a sufficiently accurate test for MLC positioning reproducibility. It is a simple and straightforward procedure that can be used for routine MLC position checks.

AB - Purpose: As specified in TG142, MLC position accuracy needs to be tested on weekly/monthly basis, with 1mm tolerance. This study focuses on developing techniques, hardware and software tools for implementation of MLC QA tests for Elekta Linacs. Material and Methods: This process was tested with an Elekta Synergy S, Beam Modulator™, which has 40 leaf pairs of 4mm width (maximum 16cm×21cm field size). Based on the machine characteristics, two picket‐fence IMRT plans were designed: one has 5 2cm×16cm strips separated by 2cm gap; the other has the same setup with individual leafs intentionally displaced by ±1mm, ±1.2mm, etc. Both plans used 6MV x‐rays and 50MU on each strip. We overcame the limitation of Xio planning system in generating picket‐fence IMRT plan by modifying leaf positions from a DICOM RT plan file. In‐house software was executed to validate the files before imported into Record and Verify system (Mosaiq) for delivery. Radiographic images were acquired using Kodak XV films. The borders of a 16cm×21cm light field were first traced on the film. These reference lines helped reduce the orientation errors during image registration. Two sets of films were exposed with full buildup. After development, each film was digitized with 0.06mm resolution using a high‐resolution scanner. The images were then imported into Matlab. In‐house code was used to detect leafs exceeding the 1mm threshold. Results: The plans were delivered smoothly. Leaf positions in the first image were used as baselines, instead of using reference leaf positions from the same exposure. This reduced systematic errors. After image registration, leafs displacing from the baseline by 16 pixels (1mm) or more were detected. Conclusion: This efficient procedure provides a sufficiently accurate test for MLC positioning reproducibility. It is a simple and straightforward procedure that can be used for routine MLC position checks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024818519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024818519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3468709

DO - 10.1118/1.3468709

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024818519

VL - 37

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -