SU‐GG‐I‐142: A Small Field‐Of‐View, Mobile PET/SPECT System for Bedside Environments: A Dynamic Cardiac Phantom Study Using 99mTc and 18F‐FDG

Matthew Thomas Studenski, D. Gilland, J. Parker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Asses the performance capability of a small field‐of‐view mobile PET/SPECT unit for 99m‐Tc and F‐18 FDG cardiac SPECT imaging in bedside environments with critically ill patients who cannot be transported to a traditional SPECT system. Method and Materials: A dynamic cardiac phantom was used to evaluate the effects of angular sampling, counts per projection, cardiac motion, and out of field activity in bedside SPECT imaging using 99m‐Tc and F‐18 FDG. The mobile SPECT system consists of two detector heads with pixilated NaI scintillators and is capable of maneuvering in an ICU or ER to image patients that are confined to bed. 180 degree SPECT acquisitions were performed with angular samplings of 19, 10, and 5 evenly spaced angles and 500, 250, and 100 thousand counts per projection. Collimated F‐18 FDG SPECT imaging is preferred over PET in this environment due to difficulties in positioning a detector beneath a bed. More projection angles with less attenuation effect can be obtained with anterior SPECT as well. Acquisitions were performed at end systole, end diastole, with the heart beating (72 BPM and 45% EF), and with the heart beating and activity in the simulated liver. Results: Viable images were reconstructed using MLEM for both 99m‐Tc and F‐18 FDG. Contrast increases with increased angular sampling and counts per projection in these images. Viable images can be obtained with lower sampling if the situation requires it. F‐18 FDG imaging will require higher counts and projection angles due to center‐of‐rotation errors. Conclusion: SPECT cardiac imaging of immobile, critically ill patients is possible using both Tc‐99m and F‐18 FDG. The versatility of this system makes it a useful tool for examining patients who could not have this exam but would benefit from it greatly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography
Critical Illness
Diastole
Equidae
Systole
Head
Liver

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{98ddc7c3bccf4c99bc58fe2630d641cf,
title = "SU‐GG‐I‐142: A Small Field‐Of‐View, Mobile PET/SPECT System for Bedside Environments: A Dynamic Cardiac Phantom Study Using 99mTc and 18F‐FDG",
abstract = "Purpose: Asses the performance capability of a small field‐of‐view mobile PET/SPECT unit for 99m‐Tc and F‐18 FDG cardiac SPECT imaging in bedside environments with critically ill patients who cannot be transported to a traditional SPECT system. Method and Materials: A dynamic cardiac phantom was used to evaluate the effects of angular sampling, counts per projection, cardiac motion, and out of field activity in bedside SPECT imaging using 99m‐Tc and F‐18 FDG. The mobile SPECT system consists of two detector heads with pixilated NaI scintillators and is capable of maneuvering in an ICU or ER to image patients that are confined to bed. 180 degree SPECT acquisitions were performed with angular samplings of 19, 10, and 5 evenly spaced angles and 500, 250, and 100 thousand counts per projection. Collimated F‐18 FDG SPECT imaging is preferred over PET in this environment due to difficulties in positioning a detector beneath a bed. More projection angles with less attenuation effect can be obtained with anterior SPECT as well. Acquisitions were performed at end systole, end diastole, with the heart beating (72 BPM and 45{\%} EF), and with the heart beating and activity in the simulated liver. Results: Viable images were reconstructed using MLEM for both 99m‐Tc and F‐18 FDG. Contrast increases with increased angular sampling and counts per projection in these images. Viable images can be obtained with lower sampling if the situation requires it. F‐18 FDG imaging will require higher counts and projection angles due to center‐of‐rotation errors. Conclusion: SPECT cardiac imaging of immobile, critically ill patients is possible using both Tc‐99m and F‐18 FDG. The versatility of this system makes it a useful tool for examining patients who could not have this exam but would benefit from it greatly.",
author = "Studenski, {Matthew Thomas} and D. Gilland and J. Parker",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.2961540",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐GG‐I‐142

T2 - A Small Field‐Of‐View, Mobile PET/SPECT System for Bedside Environments: A Dynamic Cardiac Phantom Study Using 99mTc and 18F‐FDG

AU - Studenski, Matthew Thomas

AU - Gilland, D.

AU - Parker, J.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Asses the performance capability of a small field‐of‐view mobile PET/SPECT unit for 99m‐Tc and F‐18 FDG cardiac SPECT imaging in bedside environments with critically ill patients who cannot be transported to a traditional SPECT system. Method and Materials: A dynamic cardiac phantom was used to evaluate the effects of angular sampling, counts per projection, cardiac motion, and out of field activity in bedside SPECT imaging using 99m‐Tc and F‐18 FDG. The mobile SPECT system consists of two detector heads with pixilated NaI scintillators and is capable of maneuvering in an ICU or ER to image patients that are confined to bed. 180 degree SPECT acquisitions were performed with angular samplings of 19, 10, and 5 evenly spaced angles and 500, 250, and 100 thousand counts per projection. Collimated F‐18 FDG SPECT imaging is preferred over PET in this environment due to difficulties in positioning a detector beneath a bed. More projection angles with less attenuation effect can be obtained with anterior SPECT as well. Acquisitions were performed at end systole, end diastole, with the heart beating (72 BPM and 45% EF), and with the heart beating and activity in the simulated liver. Results: Viable images were reconstructed using MLEM for both 99m‐Tc and F‐18 FDG. Contrast increases with increased angular sampling and counts per projection in these images. Viable images can be obtained with lower sampling if the situation requires it. F‐18 FDG imaging will require higher counts and projection angles due to center‐of‐rotation errors. Conclusion: SPECT cardiac imaging of immobile, critically ill patients is possible using both Tc‐99m and F‐18 FDG. The versatility of this system makes it a useful tool for examining patients who could not have this exam but would benefit from it greatly.

AB - Purpose: Asses the performance capability of a small field‐of‐view mobile PET/SPECT unit for 99m‐Tc and F‐18 FDG cardiac SPECT imaging in bedside environments with critically ill patients who cannot be transported to a traditional SPECT system. Method and Materials: A dynamic cardiac phantom was used to evaluate the effects of angular sampling, counts per projection, cardiac motion, and out of field activity in bedside SPECT imaging using 99m‐Tc and F‐18 FDG. The mobile SPECT system consists of two detector heads with pixilated NaI scintillators and is capable of maneuvering in an ICU or ER to image patients that are confined to bed. 180 degree SPECT acquisitions were performed with angular samplings of 19, 10, and 5 evenly spaced angles and 500, 250, and 100 thousand counts per projection. Collimated F‐18 FDG SPECT imaging is preferred over PET in this environment due to difficulties in positioning a detector beneath a bed. More projection angles with less attenuation effect can be obtained with anterior SPECT as well. Acquisitions were performed at end systole, end diastole, with the heart beating (72 BPM and 45% EF), and with the heart beating and activity in the simulated liver. Results: Viable images were reconstructed using MLEM for both 99m‐Tc and F‐18 FDG. Contrast increases with increased angular sampling and counts per projection in these images. Viable images can be obtained with lower sampling if the situation requires it. F‐18 FDG imaging will require higher counts and projection angles due to center‐of‐rotation errors. Conclusion: SPECT cardiac imaging of immobile, critically ill patients is possible using both Tc‐99m and F‐18 FDG. The versatility of this system makes it a useful tool for examining patients who could not have this exam but would benefit from it greatly.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024821621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024821621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2961540

DO - 10.1118/1.2961540

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024821621

VL - 35

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -