SU‐FF‐T‐20: A Method for Evaluation of the Dose Prediction and Optimization Convergence Errors

Ivaylo B Mihaylov, J. Siebers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: IMRT optimization solutions are influenced by the computation algorithms used in the estimation of the radiation field incident upon the patient as well as the dose calculation algorithm. This work describes a technique for evaluating the dose prediction errors (DPEs) and optimization convergence errors (OCEs) due to inaccuracies in the heterogeneity correction of the optimization dose calculation algorithm. Method and Materials: The heterogeneity‐induced DPE and OCE of convolution‐based optimization are studied by utilizing a sequential deliverable‐based IMRT optimization. Initially, a method (MxOpt) utilizing a Monte Carlo (MC)‐based algorithm to estimate the incident upon a patient fluence (derived from the MLC leaf sequences), coupled to a conventional (convolution) dose calculation algorithm, is used for the optimization. Following the MxOpt optimization convergence, a second method which utilizes MC for both fluence prediction and dose deposition in a patient is performed. DPEs due to patient heterogeneities and incident fluence prediction are evaluated by re‐computing MxOpt converged solution with a full MC (MxOpt+MC) method, while OCEs are evaluated by comparing the MxOpt+MC computed dose with the converged MCOpt optimization result. The technique is evaluated by performing the optimization sequences on two Head‐and‐Neck IMRT patient plans. Dose‐volume indices were evaluated to compare the plans. Results: For the plans assessed, the GTV D98 and CTV D95 indices agree within ±2% for both DPE and OCE estimations. The Nodal‐CTV D90 DPEs and OCEs are within 3%. The DPEs and OCEs in the critical structures (Cord D02, Brainstem D02, and Parotid D50.) are less than 3.5%. When MCOpt follows MxOpt, only 3–4 iterations were required for convergence. Conclusion: A technique for evaluation of the DPEs and the OCEs in the deliverable IMRT optimization has been developed. The feasibility of the proposed technique was demonstrated on two Head‐and‐Neck deliverable IMRT plans. (Supported by NIH‐1R01CA98524).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this