Stupid people deserve what they get: The effects of personality assessment on judgments of intentional action

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Knobe argues that people's judgments of the moral status of a side-effect of action influence their assessment of whether the side-effect is intentional. I tested this hypothesis using vignettes akin to Knobe's but involving economically or eudaimonistically (wellness-related) negative side-effects. My results show that it is people's sense of what agents deserve, and not the moral status of side-effects, that drives intuition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)332-334
Number of pages3
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Personality Assessment
Intuition
Moral Status
Drive

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

@article{2f3b840b46a14c66818b6472d50f6724,
title = "Stupid people deserve what they get: The effects of personality assessment on judgments of intentional action",
abstract = "Knobe argues that people's judgments of the moral status of a side-effect of action influence their assessment of whether the side-effect is intentional. I tested this hypothesis using vignettes akin to Knobe's but involving economically or eudaimonistically (wellness-related) negative side-effects. My results show that it is people's sense of what agents deserve, and not the moral status of side-effects, that drives intuition.",
author = "Berit Brogaard",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X1000169X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "332--334",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stupid people deserve what they get

T2 - The effects of personality assessment on judgments of intentional action

AU - Brogaard, Berit

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - Knobe argues that people's judgments of the moral status of a side-effect of action influence their assessment of whether the side-effect is intentional. I tested this hypothesis using vignettes akin to Knobe's but involving economically or eudaimonistically (wellness-related) negative side-effects. My results show that it is people's sense of what agents deserve, and not the moral status of side-effects, that drives intuition.

AB - Knobe argues that people's judgments of the moral status of a side-effect of action influence their assessment of whether the side-effect is intentional. I tested this hypothesis using vignettes akin to Knobe's but involving economically or eudaimonistically (wellness-related) negative side-effects. My results show that it is people's sense of what agents deserve, and not the moral status of side-effects, that drives intuition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649964806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649964806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X1000169X

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X1000169X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78649964806

VL - 33

SP - 332

EP - 334

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

IS - 4

ER -