Strategies to avoid a missed diagnosis of co-occurring concussion in post-acute patients having a spinal cord injury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research scientists and clinicians should be aware that missed diagnoses of mild-moderate traumatic brain injuries in post-acute patients having spinal cord injuries may approach 60–74% with certain risk factors, potentially causing clinical consequences for patients, and confounding the results of clinical research studies. Factors leading to a missed diagnosis may include acute trauma- related life-threatening issues, sedation/intubation, subtle neuropathology on neuroimaging, failure to collect Glasgow Coma Scale scores or duration of posttraumatic amnesia, or lack of validity of this information, and overlap in neuro-cognitive symptoms with emotional responses to spinal cord injuries. Strategies for avoiding a missed diagnosis of mild-moderate traumatic brain injuries in patients having a spinal cord injuries are highlighted in this perspective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)859-861
Number of pages3
JournalNeural Regeneration Research
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Injuries
Brain Concussion
Neurobehavioral Manifestations
Glasgow Coma Scale
Amnesia
Research
Intubation
Neuroimaging
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Brain concussion
  • Complications
  • Diagnosis
  • Dual diagnosis
  • Post-concussion syndrome
  • Rehabilitation
  • Spinal cord injuries
  • Traumatic brain injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{d5f642bba23a409c85b59a5d461bfdae,
title = "Strategies to avoid a missed diagnosis of co-occurring concussion in post-acute patients having a spinal cord injury",
abstract = "Research scientists and clinicians should be aware that missed diagnoses of mild-moderate traumatic brain injuries in post-acute patients having spinal cord injuries may approach 60–74{\%} with certain risk factors, potentially causing clinical consequences for patients, and confounding the results of clinical research studies. Factors leading to a missed diagnosis may include acute trauma- related life-threatening issues, sedation/intubation, subtle neuropathology on neuroimaging, failure to collect Glasgow Coma Scale scores or duration of posttraumatic amnesia, or lack of validity of this information, and overlap in neuro-cognitive symptoms with emotional responses to spinal cord injuries. Strategies for avoiding a missed diagnosis of mild-moderate traumatic brain injuries in patients having a spinal cord injuries are highlighted in this perspective.",
keywords = "Brain concussion, Complications, Diagnosis, Dual diagnosis, Post-concussion syndrome, Rehabilitation, Spinal cord injuries, Traumatic brain injury",
author = "David Kushner",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/1673-5374.158329",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "859--861",
journal = "Neural Regeneration Research",
issn = "1673-5374",
publisher = "Editorial Board of Neural Regeneration Research",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategies to avoid a missed diagnosis of co-occurring concussion in post-acute patients having a spinal cord injury

AU - Kushner, David

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Research scientists and clinicians should be aware that missed diagnoses of mild-moderate traumatic brain injuries in post-acute patients having spinal cord injuries may approach 60–74% with certain risk factors, potentially causing clinical consequences for patients, and confounding the results of clinical research studies. Factors leading to a missed diagnosis may include acute trauma- related life-threatening issues, sedation/intubation, subtle neuropathology on neuroimaging, failure to collect Glasgow Coma Scale scores or duration of posttraumatic amnesia, or lack of validity of this information, and overlap in neuro-cognitive symptoms with emotional responses to spinal cord injuries. Strategies for avoiding a missed diagnosis of mild-moderate traumatic brain injuries in patients having a spinal cord injuries are highlighted in this perspective.

AB - Research scientists and clinicians should be aware that missed diagnoses of mild-moderate traumatic brain injuries in post-acute patients having spinal cord injuries may approach 60–74% with certain risk factors, potentially causing clinical consequences for patients, and confounding the results of clinical research studies. Factors leading to a missed diagnosis may include acute trauma- related life-threatening issues, sedation/intubation, subtle neuropathology on neuroimaging, failure to collect Glasgow Coma Scale scores or duration of posttraumatic amnesia, or lack of validity of this information, and overlap in neuro-cognitive symptoms with emotional responses to spinal cord injuries. Strategies for avoiding a missed diagnosis of mild-moderate traumatic brain injuries in patients having a spinal cord injuries are highlighted in this perspective.

KW - Brain concussion

KW - Complications

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Dual diagnosis

KW - Post-concussion syndrome

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Spinal cord injuries

KW - Traumatic brain injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934754342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84934754342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/1673-5374.158329

DO - 10.4103/1673-5374.158329

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84934754342

VL - 10

SP - 859

EP - 861

JO - Neural Regeneration Research

JF - Neural Regeneration Research

SN - 1673-5374

IS - 6

ER -