Strategies for writing a successful National Institutes of Health grant proposal for the early-career neurointerventionalist

Peter Kan, Maxim Mokin, William J. MacK, Robert M. Starke, Kevin N. Sheth, Felipe C. Albuquerque, Michael R. Levitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective The goal of this article is to provide a succinct review of the key components of a NIH grant application and the NIH reviewprocess for the early career neurointerventionalist. Methods The authors reviewed NIH rules and regulations and also reflected on their own collective experiencein writing NIH grant proposals in the area of cerebrovascular disease andneurointerventional surgery. Results Key components of theresearch strategy include specific aims, significance, innovation and approach.The specific aims page is the most important page of the application and should be written first. The NIH review isbased on these key components along with an assessment of the appropriatenessof the investigators and environment for the research. Conclusion Detailed knowledge ofthe key components of the research grant is critical to a successful application.The information in the article may aid in the grant writing for early careerneurointerventionalists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-286
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of neurointerventional surgery
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2021

Keywords

  • Bbrain
  • Economics
  • Standards
  • Statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strategies for writing a successful National Institutes of Health grant proposal for the early-career neurointerventionalist'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this