Standardizing Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping Analysis from the Human ImmunoPhenotyping Consortium

Greg Finak, Marc Langweiler, Maria Jaimes, Mehrnoush Malek, Jafar Taghiyar, Yael Korin, Khadir Raddassi, Lesley Devine, Gerlinde Obermoser, Marcin L. Pekalski, Nikolas Pontikos, Alain Diaz, Susanne Heck, Federica Villanova, Nadia Terrazzini, Florian Kern, Yu Qian, Rick Stanton, Kui Wang, Aaron BrandesJohn Ramey, Nima Aghaeepour, Tim Mosmann, Richard H. Scheuermann, Elaine Reed, Karolina Palucka, Virginia Pascual, Bonnie B Blomberg, Frank Nestle, Robert B. Nussenblatt, Ryan Remy Brinkman, Raphael Gottardo, Holden Maecker, J. Philip McCoy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Standardization of immunophenotyping requires careful attention to reagents, sample handling, instrument setup, and data analysis, and is essential for successful cross-study and cross-center comparison of data. Experts developed five standardized, eight-color panels for identification of major immune cell subsets in peripheral blood. These were produced as pre-configured, lyophilized, reagents in 96-well plates. We present the results of a coordinated analysis of samples across nine laboratories using these panels with standardized operating procedures (SOPs). Manual gating was performed by each site and by a central site. Automated gating algorithms were developed and tested by the FlowCAP consortium. Centralized manual gating can reduce cross-center variability, and we sought to determine whether automated methods could streamline and standardize the analysis. Within-site variability was low in all experiments, but cross-site variability was lower when central analysis was performed in comparison with site-specific analysis. It was also lower for clearly defined cell subsets than those based on dim markers and for rare populations. Automated gating was able to match the performance of central manual analysis for all tested panels, exhibiting little to no bias and comparable variability. Standardized staining, data collection, and automated gating can increase power, reduce variability, and streamline analysis for immunophenotyping.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number20686
JournalScientific Reports
Volume6
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 10 2016

Fingerprint

Immunophenotyping
Flow Cytometry
Color
Staining and Labeling
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Finak, G., Langweiler, M., Jaimes, M., Malek, M., Taghiyar, J., Korin, Y., ... McCoy, J. P. (2016). Standardizing Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping Analysis from the Human ImmunoPhenotyping Consortium. Scientific Reports, 6, [20686]. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20686

Standardizing Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping Analysis from the Human ImmunoPhenotyping Consortium. / Finak, Greg; Langweiler, Marc; Jaimes, Maria; Malek, Mehrnoush; Taghiyar, Jafar; Korin, Yael; Raddassi, Khadir; Devine, Lesley; Obermoser, Gerlinde; Pekalski, Marcin L.; Pontikos, Nikolas; Diaz, Alain; Heck, Susanne; Villanova, Federica; Terrazzini, Nadia; Kern, Florian; Qian, Yu; Stanton, Rick; Wang, Kui; Brandes, Aaron; Ramey, John; Aghaeepour, Nima; Mosmann, Tim; Scheuermann, Richard H.; Reed, Elaine; Palucka, Karolina; Pascual, Virginia; Blomberg, Bonnie B; Nestle, Frank; Nussenblatt, Robert B.; Brinkman, Ryan Remy; Gottardo, Raphael; Maecker, Holden; McCoy, J. Philip.

In: Scientific Reports, Vol. 6, 20686, 10.02.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Finak, G, Langweiler, M, Jaimes, M, Malek, M, Taghiyar, J, Korin, Y, Raddassi, K, Devine, L, Obermoser, G, Pekalski, ML, Pontikos, N, Diaz, A, Heck, S, Villanova, F, Terrazzini, N, Kern, F, Qian, Y, Stanton, R, Wang, K, Brandes, A, Ramey, J, Aghaeepour, N, Mosmann, T, Scheuermann, RH, Reed, E, Palucka, K, Pascual, V, Blomberg, BB, Nestle, F, Nussenblatt, RB, Brinkman, RR, Gottardo, R, Maecker, H & McCoy, JP 2016, 'Standardizing Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping Analysis from the Human ImmunoPhenotyping Consortium', Scientific Reports, vol. 6, 20686. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20686
Finak, Greg ; Langweiler, Marc ; Jaimes, Maria ; Malek, Mehrnoush ; Taghiyar, Jafar ; Korin, Yael ; Raddassi, Khadir ; Devine, Lesley ; Obermoser, Gerlinde ; Pekalski, Marcin L. ; Pontikos, Nikolas ; Diaz, Alain ; Heck, Susanne ; Villanova, Federica ; Terrazzini, Nadia ; Kern, Florian ; Qian, Yu ; Stanton, Rick ; Wang, Kui ; Brandes, Aaron ; Ramey, John ; Aghaeepour, Nima ; Mosmann, Tim ; Scheuermann, Richard H. ; Reed, Elaine ; Palucka, Karolina ; Pascual, Virginia ; Blomberg, Bonnie B ; Nestle, Frank ; Nussenblatt, Robert B. ; Brinkman, Ryan Remy ; Gottardo, Raphael ; Maecker, Holden ; McCoy, J. Philip. / Standardizing Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping Analysis from the Human ImmunoPhenotyping Consortium. In: Scientific Reports. 2016 ; Vol. 6.
@article{1737abad6d7b4cca9aeea5ae8b88b43c,
title = "Standardizing Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping Analysis from the Human ImmunoPhenotyping Consortium",
abstract = "Standardization of immunophenotyping requires careful attention to reagents, sample handling, instrument setup, and data analysis, and is essential for successful cross-study and cross-center comparison of data. Experts developed five standardized, eight-color panels for identification of major immune cell subsets in peripheral blood. These were produced as pre-configured, lyophilized, reagents in 96-well plates. We present the results of a coordinated analysis of samples across nine laboratories using these panels with standardized operating procedures (SOPs). Manual gating was performed by each site and by a central site. Automated gating algorithms were developed and tested by the FlowCAP consortium. Centralized manual gating can reduce cross-center variability, and we sought to determine whether automated methods could streamline and standardize the analysis. Within-site variability was low in all experiments, but cross-site variability was lower when central analysis was performed in comparison with site-specific analysis. It was also lower for clearly defined cell subsets than those based on dim markers and for rare populations. Automated gating was able to match the performance of central manual analysis for all tested panels, exhibiting little to no bias and comparable variability. Standardized staining, data collection, and automated gating can increase power, reduce variability, and streamline analysis for immunophenotyping.",
author = "Greg Finak and Marc Langweiler and Maria Jaimes and Mehrnoush Malek and Jafar Taghiyar and Yael Korin and Khadir Raddassi and Lesley Devine and Gerlinde Obermoser and Pekalski, {Marcin L.} and Nikolas Pontikos and Alain Diaz and Susanne Heck and Federica Villanova and Nadia Terrazzini and Florian Kern and Yu Qian and Rick Stanton and Kui Wang and Aaron Brandes and John Ramey and Nima Aghaeepour and Tim Mosmann and Scheuermann, {Richard H.} and Elaine Reed and Karolina Palucka and Virginia Pascual and Blomberg, {Bonnie B} and Frank Nestle and Nussenblatt, {Robert B.} and Brinkman, {Ryan Remy} and Raphael Gottardo and Holden Maecker and McCoy, {J. Philip}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1038/srep20686",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standardizing Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping Analysis from the Human ImmunoPhenotyping Consortium

AU - Finak, Greg

AU - Langweiler, Marc

AU - Jaimes, Maria

AU - Malek, Mehrnoush

AU - Taghiyar, Jafar

AU - Korin, Yael

AU - Raddassi, Khadir

AU - Devine, Lesley

AU - Obermoser, Gerlinde

AU - Pekalski, Marcin L.

AU - Pontikos, Nikolas

AU - Diaz, Alain

AU - Heck, Susanne

AU - Villanova, Federica

AU - Terrazzini, Nadia

AU - Kern, Florian

AU - Qian, Yu

AU - Stanton, Rick

AU - Wang, Kui

AU - Brandes, Aaron

AU - Ramey, John

AU - Aghaeepour, Nima

AU - Mosmann, Tim

AU - Scheuermann, Richard H.

AU - Reed, Elaine

AU - Palucka, Karolina

AU - Pascual, Virginia

AU - Blomberg, Bonnie B

AU - Nestle, Frank

AU - Nussenblatt, Robert B.

AU - Brinkman, Ryan Remy

AU - Gottardo, Raphael

AU - Maecker, Holden

AU - McCoy, J. Philip

PY - 2016/2/10

Y1 - 2016/2/10

N2 - Standardization of immunophenotyping requires careful attention to reagents, sample handling, instrument setup, and data analysis, and is essential for successful cross-study and cross-center comparison of data. Experts developed five standardized, eight-color panels for identification of major immune cell subsets in peripheral blood. These were produced as pre-configured, lyophilized, reagents in 96-well plates. We present the results of a coordinated analysis of samples across nine laboratories using these panels with standardized operating procedures (SOPs). Manual gating was performed by each site and by a central site. Automated gating algorithms were developed and tested by the FlowCAP consortium. Centralized manual gating can reduce cross-center variability, and we sought to determine whether automated methods could streamline and standardize the analysis. Within-site variability was low in all experiments, but cross-site variability was lower when central analysis was performed in comparison with site-specific analysis. It was also lower for clearly defined cell subsets than those based on dim markers and for rare populations. Automated gating was able to match the performance of central manual analysis for all tested panels, exhibiting little to no bias and comparable variability. Standardized staining, data collection, and automated gating can increase power, reduce variability, and streamline analysis for immunophenotyping.

AB - Standardization of immunophenotyping requires careful attention to reagents, sample handling, instrument setup, and data analysis, and is essential for successful cross-study and cross-center comparison of data. Experts developed five standardized, eight-color panels for identification of major immune cell subsets in peripheral blood. These were produced as pre-configured, lyophilized, reagents in 96-well plates. We present the results of a coordinated analysis of samples across nine laboratories using these panels with standardized operating procedures (SOPs). Manual gating was performed by each site and by a central site. Automated gating algorithms were developed and tested by the FlowCAP consortium. Centralized manual gating can reduce cross-center variability, and we sought to determine whether automated methods could streamline and standardize the analysis. Within-site variability was low in all experiments, but cross-site variability was lower when central analysis was performed in comparison with site-specific analysis. It was also lower for clearly defined cell subsets than those based on dim markers and for rare populations. Automated gating was able to match the performance of central manual analysis for all tested panels, exhibiting little to no bias and comparable variability. Standardized staining, data collection, and automated gating can increase power, reduce variability, and streamline analysis for immunophenotyping.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957539424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957539424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/srep20686

DO - 10.1038/srep20686

M3 - Article

C2 - 26861911

AN - SCOPUS:84957539424

VL - 6

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

M1 - 20686

ER -