Standard biopsy forceps versus large-capacity forceps with and without needle

D. E. Bernstein, Jamie S Barkin, D. K. Reiner, J. Lubin, R. S. Phillips, L. Grauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Endoscopic biopsy forceps vary in size and design. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the quality and quantity of gastric tissue obtained by needle and non-needle versions of standard biopsy forceps and newly designed large capacity forceps. Fifty consecutive patients who underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsy forceps were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the presence of crush artifact between the two forceps, both with and without the presence of a needle. Both needle and non-needle versions of the large capacity biopsy forceps were found to obtain significantly larger sized specimens (p = 0.02) than needle and non-needle versions of the standard biopsy forceps. Overall, there was no significant difference in the depth of specimen obtained when comparing the large capacity forceps to standard forceps. Needle versions of each forceps were found to obtain significantly deeper biopsies than non-needle versions of each forceps. In conclusion, our study found that large capacity forceps obtained larger specimens than standard biopsy forceps. Further clinical trials with a larger study population need to be undertaken to determine the impact of these findings on the determination of diagnoses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)573-576
Number of pages4
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 27 1995

Fingerprint

Surgical Instruments
Needles
Biopsy
Stomach
Needle Biopsy
Artifacts
Endoscopy
Clinical Trials
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Standard biopsy forceps versus large-capacity forceps with and without needle. / Bernstein, D. E.; Barkin, Jamie S; Reiner, D. K.; Lubin, J.; Phillips, R. S.; Grauer, L.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 41, No. 6, 27.06.1995, p. 573-576.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bernstein, D. E. ; Barkin, Jamie S ; Reiner, D. K. ; Lubin, J. ; Phillips, R. S. ; Grauer, L. / Standard biopsy forceps versus large-capacity forceps with and without needle. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1995 ; Vol. 41, No. 6. pp. 573-576.
@article{fad3195250254615ad5c5c6450927e8d,
title = "Standard biopsy forceps versus large-capacity forceps with and without needle",
abstract = "Endoscopic biopsy forceps vary in size and design. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the quality and quantity of gastric tissue obtained by needle and non-needle versions of standard biopsy forceps and newly designed large capacity forceps. Fifty consecutive patients who underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsy forceps were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the presence of crush artifact between the two forceps, both with and without the presence of a needle. Both needle and non-needle versions of the large capacity biopsy forceps were found to obtain significantly larger sized specimens (p = 0.02) than needle and non-needle versions of the standard biopsy forceps. Overall, there was no significant difference in the depth of specimen obtained when comparing the large capacity forceps to standard forceps. Needle versions of each forceps were found to obtain significantly deeper biopsies than non-needle versions of each forceps. In conclusion, our study found that large capacity forceps obtained larger specimens than standard biopsy forceps. Further clinical trials with a larger study population need to be undertaken to determine the impact of these findings on the determination of diagnoses.",
author = "Bernstein, {D. E.} and Barkin, {Jamie S} and Reiner, {D. K.} and J. Lubin and Phillips, {R. S.} and L. Grauer",
year = "1995",
month = "6",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70193-1",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "573--576",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standard biopsy forceps versus large-capacity forceps with and without needle

AU - Bernstein, D. E.

AU - Barkin, Jamie S

AU - Reiner, D. K.

AU - Lubin, J.

AU - Phillips, R. S.

AU - Grauer, L.

PY - 1995/6/27

Y1 - 1995/6/27

N2 - Endoscopic biopsy forceps vary in size and design. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the quality and quantity of gastric tissue obtained by needle and non-needle versions of standard biopsy forceps and newly designed large capacity forceps. Fifty consecutive patients who underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsy forceps were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the presence of crush artifact between the two forceps, both with and without the presence of a needle. Both needle and non-needle versions of the large capacity biopsy forceps were found to obtain significantly larger sized specimens (p = 0.02) than needle and non-needle versions of the standard biopsy forceps. Overall, there was no significant difference in the depth of specimen obtained when comparing the large capacity forceps to standard forceps. Needle versions of each forceps were found to obtain significantly deeper biopsies than non-needle versions of each forceps. In conclusion, our study found that large capacity forceps obtained larger specimens than standard biopsy forceps. Further clinical trials with a larger study population need to be undertaken to determine the impact of these findings on the determination of diagnoses.

AB - Endoscopic biopsy forceps vary in size and design. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the quality and quantity of gastric tissue obtained by needle and non-needle versions of standard biopsy forceps and newly designed large capacity forceps. Fifty consecutive patients who underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsy forceps were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the presence of crush artifact between the two forceps, both with and without the presence of a needle. Both needle and non-needle versions of the large capacity biopsy forceps were found to obtain significantly larger sized specimens (p = 0.02) than needle and non-needle versions of the standard biopsy forceps. Overall, there was no significant difference in the depth of specimen obtained when comparing the large capacity forceps to standard forceps. Needle versions of each forceps were found to obtain significantly deeper biopsies than non-needle versions of each forceps. In conclusion, our study found that large capacity forceps obtained larger specimens than standard biopsy forceps. Further clinical trials with a larger study population need to be undertaken to determine the impact of these findings on the determination of diagnoses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029011787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029011787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70193-1

DO - 10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70193-1

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 573

EP - 576

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 6

ER -