Specificity of endothelial cell reorientation in response to cyclic mechanical stretching

James H C Wang, Pascal Goldschmidt-Clermont, Jeremiah Wille, Frank C P Yin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

244 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence suggests that cellular responses to mechanical stimuli depend specifically on the type of stimuli imposed. For example, when subjected to fluid shear stress, endothelial cells align along the flow direction. In contrast, in response to cyclic stretching, cells align away from the stretching direction. However, a few aspects of this cell alignment response remain to be clarified: (1) Is the cell alignment due to actual cell reorientation or selective cell detachment? (2) Does the resulting cell alignment represent a response of the cells to elongation or shortening, or both? (3) Does the cell alignment depend on the stretching magnitude or rate, or both? Finally, the role of the actin cytoskeleton and microtubules in the cell alignment response remains unclear. To address these questions, we grew human aortic endothelial cells on deformable silicone membranes and subjected them to three types of cyclic stretching: simple elongation, pure uniaxial stretching and equi-biaxial stretching. Examination of the same cells before and after stretching revealed that they reoriented. Cells subjected to either simple elongation or pure uniaxial stretching reoriented specifically toward the direction of minimal substrate deformation, even though the directions for the two types of stretching differed by only about 20°. At comparable stretching durations, the extent of cell reorientation was more closely related to the stretching magnitude than the stretching rate. The actin cytoskeleton of the endothelial cell subjected to either type of stretching was reorganized into parallel arrays of actin filaments (i.e., stress fibers) aligned in the direction of the minimal substrate deformation. Furthermore, in response to equi-biaxial stretching, the actin cytoskeleton was remodeled into a 'tent-like' structure oriented out of the membrane plane-again towards the direction of the minimal substrate deformation. Finally, abolishing microtubules prevented neither the formation of stress fibers nor cell reorientation. Thus, endothelial cells respond very specifically to the type of deformation imposed upon them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1563-1572
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume34
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 20 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Endothelial cells
Stretching
Endothelial Cells
Actin Cytoskeleton
Stress Fibers
Elongation
Microtubules
Substrates
Membranes
Fibers
Silicones
Direction compound
Shear stress

Keywords

  • Cell alignment
  • Cellular mechanics
  • Endothelial cells
  • Mechanical stretching
  • Stress fibers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Specificity of endothelial cell reorientation in response to cyclic mechanical stretching. / Wang, James H C; Goldschmidt-Clermont, Pascal; Wille, Jeremiah; Yin, Frank C P.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 34, No. 12, 20.11.2001, p. 1563-1572.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wang, James H C ; Goldschmidt-Clermont, Pascal ; Wille, Jeremiah ; Yin, Frank C P. / Specificity of endothelial cell reorientation in response to cyclic mechanical stretching. In: Journal of Biomechanics. 2001 ; Vol. 34, No. 12. pp. 1563-1572.
@article{65b87c161e9941a48cc9a452de7d6009,
title = "Specificity of endothelial cell reorientation in response to cyclic mechanical stretching",
abstract = "Evidence suggests that cellular responses to mechanical stimuli depend specifically on the type of stimuli imposed. For example, when subjected to fluid shear stress, endothelial cells align along the flow direction. In contrast, in response to cyclic stretching, cells align away from the stretching direction. However, a few aspects of this cell alignment response remain to be clarified: (1) Is the cell alignment due to actual cell reorientation or selective cell detachment? (2) Does the resulting cell alignment represent a response of the cells to elongation or shortening, or both? (3) Does the cell alignment depend on the stretching magnitude or rate, or both? Finally, the role of the actin cytoskeleton and microtubules in the cell alignment response remains unclear. To address these questions, we grew human aortic endothelial cells on deformable silicone membranes and subjected them to three types of cyclic stretching: simple elongation, pure uniaxial stretching and equi-biaxial stretching. Examination of the same cells before and after stretching revealed that they reoriented. Cells subjected to either simple elongation or pure uniaxial stretching reoriented specifically toward the direction of minimal substrate deformation, even though the directions for the two types of stretching differed by only about 20°. At comparable stretching durations, the extent of cell reorientation was more closely related to the stretching magnitude than the stretching rate. The actin cytoskeleton of the endothelial cell subjected to either type of stretching was reorganized into parallel arrays of actin filaments (i.e., stress fibers) aligned in the direction of the minimal substrate deformation. Furthermore, in response to equi-biaxial stretching, the actin cytoskeleton was remodeled into a 'tent-like' structure oriented out of the membrane plane-again towards the direction of the minimal substrate deformation. Finally, abolishing microtubules prevented neither the formation of stress fibers nor cell reorientation. Thus, endothelial cells respond very specifically to the type of deformation imposed upon them.",
keywords = "Cell alignment, Cellular mechanics, Endothelial cells, Mechanical stretching, Stress fibers",
author = "Wang, {James H C} and Pascal Goldschmidt-Clermont and Jeremiah Wille and Yin, {Frank C P}",
year = "2001",
month = "11",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00150-6",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1563--1572",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Specificity of endothelial cell reorientation in response to cyclic mechanical stretching

AU - Wang, James H C

AU - Goldschmidt-Clermont, Pascal

AU - Wille, Jeremiah

AU - Yin, Frank C P

PY - 2001/11/20

Y1 - 2001/11/20

N2 - Evidence suggests that cellular responses to mechanical stimuli depend specifically on the type of stimuli imposed. For example, when subjected to fluid shear stress, endothelial cells align along the flow direction. In contrast, in response to cyclic stretching, cells align away from the stretching direction. However, a few aspects of this cell alignment response remain to be clarified: (1) Is the cell alignment due to actual cell reorientation or selective cell detachment? (2) Does the resulting cell alignment represent a response of the cells to elongation or shortening, or both? (3) Does the cell alignment depend on the stretching magnitude or rate, or both? Finally, the role of the actin cytoskeleton and microtubules in the cell alignment response remains unclear. To address these questions, we grew human aortic endothelial cells on deformable silicone membranes and subjected them to three types of cyclic stretching: simple elongation, pure uniaxial stretching and equi-biaxial stretching. Examination of the same cells before and after stretching revealed that they reoriented. Cells subjected to either simple elongation or pure uniaxial stretching reoriented specifically toward the direction of minimal substrate deformation, even though the directions for the two types of stretching differed by only about 20°. At comparable stretching durations, the extent of cell reorientation was more closely related to the stretching magnitude than the stretching rate. The actin cytoskeleton of the endothelial cell subjected to either type of stretching was reorganized into parallel arrays of actin filaments (i.e., stress fibers) aligned in the direction of the minimal substrate deformation. Furthermore, in response to equi-biaxial stretching, the actin cytoskeleton was remodeled into a 'tent-like' structure oriented out of the membrane plane-again towards the direction of the minimal substrate deformation. Finally, abolishing microtubules prevented neither the formation of stress fibers nor cell reorientation. Thus, endothelial cells respond very specifically to the type of deformation imposed upon them.

AB - Evidence suggests that cellular responses to mechanical stimuli depend specifically on the type of stimuli imposed. For example, when subjected to fluid shear stress, endothelial cells align along the flow direction. In contrast, in response to cyclic stretching, cells align away from the stretching direction. However, a few aspects of this cell alignment response remain to be clarified: (1) Is the cell alignment due to actual cell reorientation or selective cell detachment? (2) Does the resulting cell alignment represent a response of the cells to elongation or shortening, or both? (3) Does the cell alignment depend on the stretching magnitude or rate, or both? Finally, the role of the actin cytoskeleton and microtubules in the cell alignment response remains unclear. To address these questions, we grew human aortic endothelial cells on deformable silicone membranes and subjected them to three types of cyclic stretching: simple elongation, pure uniaxial stretching and equi-biaxial stretching. Examination of the same cells before and after stretching revealed that they reoriented. Cells subjected to either simple elongation or pure uniaxial stretching reoriented specifically toward the direction of minimal substrate deformation, even though the directions for the two types of stretching differed by only about 20°. At comparable stretching durations, the extent of cell reorientation was more closely related to the stretching magnitude than the stretching rate. The actin cytoskeleton of the endothelial cell subjected to either type of stretching was reorganized into parallel arrays of actin filaments (i.e., stress fibers) aligned in the direction of the minimal substrate deformation. Furthermore, in response to equi-biaxial stretching, the actin cytoskeleton was remodeled into a 'tent-like' structure oriented out of the membrane plane-again towards the direction of the minimal substrate deformation. Finally, abolishing microtubules prevented neither the formation of stress fibers nor cell reorientation. Thus, endothelial cells respond very specifically to the type of deformation imposed upon them.

KW - Cell alignment

KW - Cellular mechanics

KW - Endothelial cells

KW - Mechanical stretching

KW - Stress fibers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034759733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034759733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00150-6

DO - 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00150-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 11716858

AN - SCOPUS:0034759733

VL - 34

SP - 1563

EP - 1572

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

IS - 12

ER -