Some distributional facts about fricatives and a perceptual explanation.

Raymond Balise, R. L. Diehl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Across and within languages voiced sibilants tend to be disfavored relative to voiceless ones. This paper explores the claim that voicing more adversely affects the distinctive acoustic properties of sibilants than those of nonsibilants. One prediction associated with this claim is that voicing differentially lowers the amplitude of frication noise for sibilants and non-sibilants so that amplitude differences between the two classes are reduced. Acoustic measurements confirm this prediction. A second prediction is that voicing has a greater negative effect on the identification of sibilants than nonsibilants. Perceptual results from this and previous studies are somewhat variable, but averaged data support this prediction. The findings suggest that voiced sibilants are disfavored in part for perceptual reasons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-110
Number of pages12
JournalPhonetica
Volume51
Issue number1-3
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

predictions
acoustics
acoustic measurement
acoustic properties
Fricatives
Sibilants
language
Prediction
Voicing
Acoustics
Frication
Language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Some distributional facts about fricatives and a perceptual explanation. / Balise, Raymond; Diehl, R. L.

In: Phonetica, Vol. 51, No. 1-3, 1994, p. 99-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8f214c2b392a4244b229fd3216a3a403,
title = "Some distributional facts about fricatives and a perceptual explanation.",
abstract = "Across and within languages voiced sibilants tend to be disfavored relative to voiceless ones. This paper explores the claim that voicing more adversely affects the distinctive acoustic properties of sibilants than those of nonsibilants. One prediction associated with this claim is that voicing differentially lowers the amplitude of frication noise for sibilants and non-sibilants so that amplitude differences between the two classes are reduced. Acoustic measurements confirm this prediction. A second prediction is that voicing has a greater negative effect on the identification of sibilants than nonsibilants. Perceptual results from this and previous studies are somewhat variable, but averaged data support this prediction. The findings suggest that voiced sibilants are disfavored in part for perceptual reasons.",
author = "Raymond Balise and Diehl, {R. L.}",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "99--110",
journal = "Phonetica",
issn = "0031-8388",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Some distributional facts about fricatives and a perceptual explanation.

AU - Balise, Raymond

AU - Diehl, R. L.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Across and within languages voiced sibilants tend to be disfavored relative to voiceless ones. This paper explores the claim that voicing more adversely affects the distinctive acoustic properties of sibilants than those of nonsibilants. One prediction associated with this claim is that voicing differentially lowers the amplitude of frication noise for sibilants and non-sibilants so that amplitude differences between the two classes are reduced. Acoustic measurements confirm this prediction. A second prediction is that voicing has a greater negative effect on the identification of sibilants than nonsibilants. Perceptual results from this and previous studies are somewhat variable, but averaged data support this prediction. The findings suggest that voiced sibilants are disfavored in part for perceptual reasons.

AB - Across and within languages voiced sibilants tend to be disfavored relative to voiceless ones. This paper explores the claim that voicing more adversely affects the distinctive acoustic properties of sibilants than those of nonsibilants. One prediction associated with this claim is that voicing differentially lowers the amplitude of frication noise for sibilants and non-sibilants so that amplitude differences between the two classes are reduced. Acoustic measurements confirm this prediction. A second prediction is that voicing has a greater negative effect on the identification of sibilants than nonsibilants. Perceptual results from this and previous studies are somewhat variable, but averaged data support this prediction. The findings suggest that voiced sibilants are disfavored in part for perceptual reasons.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028188111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028188111&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8052677

AN - SCOPUS:0028188111

VL - 51

SP - 99

EP - 110

JO - Phonetica

JF - Phonetica

SN - 0031-8388

IS - 1-3

ER -