Social cognition psychometric evaluation: Results of the initial psychometric study

Amy E. Pinkham, David L. Penn, Michael F. Green, Philip D Harvey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Measurement of social cognition in treatment trials remains problematic due to poor and limited psychometric data for many tasks. As part of the Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation (SCOPE) study, the psychometric properties of 8 tasks were assessed. One hundred and seventy-nine stable outpatients with schizophrenia and 104 healthy controls completed the battery at baseline and a 2-4-week retest period at 2 sites. Tasks included the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ), Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task (BLERT), Penn Emotion Recognition Task (ER-40), Relationships Across Domains (RAD), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (Eyes), The Awareness of Social Inferences Test (TASIT), Hinting Task, and Trustworthiness Task. Tasks were evaluated on: (i) test-retest reliability, (ii) utility as a repeated measure, (iii) relationship to functional outcome, (iv) practicality and tolerability, (v) sensitivity to group differences, and (vi) internal consistency. The BLERT and Hinting task showed the strongest psychometric properties across all evaluation criteria and are recommended for use in clinical trials. The ER-40, Eyes Task, and TASIT showed somewhat weaker psychometric properties and require further study. The AIHQ, RAD, and Trustworthiness Task showed poorer psychometric properties that suggest caution for their use in clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)494-504
Number of pages11
JournalSchizophrenia Bulletin
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Cognition
Emotions
Hostility
Clinical Trials
Reproducibility of Results
Reading
Schizophrenia
Outpatients
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Emotion processing
  • Measurement
  • Mental state attribution
  • Reliability
  • Schizophrenia
  • Social perception
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Social cognition psychometric evaluation : Results of the initial psychometric study. / Pinkham, Amy E.; Penn, David L.; Green, Michael F.; Harvey, Philip D.

In: Schizophrenia Bulletin, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2016, p. 494-504.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pinkham, Amy E. ; Penn, David L. ; Green, Michael F. ; Harvey, Philip D. / Social cognition psychometric evaluation : Results of the initial psychometric study. In: Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2016 ; Vol. 42, No. 2. pp. 494-504.
@article{5b7bc0879756416384c84c7b24bcb0a8,
title = "Social cognition psychometric evaluation: Results of the initial psychometric study",
abstract = "Measurement of social cognition in treatment trials remains problematic due to poor and limited psychometric data for many tasks. As part of the Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation (SCOPE) study, the psychometric properties of 8 tasks were assessed. One hundred and seventy-nine stable outpatients with schizophrenia and 104 healthy controls completed the battery at baseline and a 2-4-week retest period at 2 sites. Tasks included the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ), Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task (BLERT), Penn Emotion Recognition Task (ER-40), Relationships Across Domains (RAD), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (Eyes), The Awareness of Social Inferences Test (TASIT), Hinting Task, and Trustworthiness Task. Tasks were evaluated on: (i) test-retest reliability, (ii) utility as a repeated measure, (iii) relationship to functional outcome, (iv) practicality and tolerability, (v) sensitivity to group differences, and (vi) internal consistency. The BLERT and Hinting task showed the strongest psychometric properties across all evaluation criteria and are recommended for use in clinical trials. The ER-40, Eyes Task, and TASIT showed somewhat weaker psychometric properties and require further study. The AIHQ, RAD, and Trustworthiness Task showed poorer psychometric properties that suggest caution for their use in clinical trials.",
keywords = "Emotion processing, Measurement, Mental state attribution, Reliability, Schizophrenia, Social perception, Validity",
author = "Pinkham, {Amy E.} and Penn, {David L.} and Green, {Michael F.} and Harvey, {Philip D}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1093/schbul/sbv056",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "494--504",
journal = "Schizophrenia Bulletin",
issn = "0586-7614",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social cognition psychometric evaluation

T2 - Results of the initial psychometric study

AU - Pinkham, Amy E.

AU - Penn, David L.

AU - Green, Michael F.

AU - Harvey, Philip D

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Measurement of social cognition in treatment trials remains problematic due to poor and limited psychometric data for many tasks. As part of the Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation (SCOPE) study, the psychometric properties of 8 tasks were assessed. One hundred and seventy-nine stable outpatients with schizophrenia and 104 healthy controls completed the battery at baseline and a 2-4-week retest period at 2 sites. Tasks included the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ), Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task (BLERT), Penn Emotion Recognition Task (ER-40), Relationships Across Domains (RAD), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (Eyes), The Awareness of Social Inferences Test (TASIT), Hinting Task, and Trustworthiness Task. Tasks were evaluated on: (i) test-retest reliability, (ii) utility as a repeated measure, (iii) relationship to functional outcome, (iv) practicality and tolerability, (v) sensitivity to group differences, and (vi) internal consistency. The BLERT and Hinting task showed the strongest psychometric properties across all evaluation criteria and are recommended for use in clinical trials. The ER-40, Eyes Task, and TASIT showed somewhat weaker psychometric properties and require further study. The AIHQ, RAD, and Trustworthiness Task showed poorer psychometric properties that suggest caution for their use in clinical trials.

AB - Measurement of social cognition in treatment trials remains problematic due to poor and limited psychometric data for many tasks. As part of the Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation (SCOPE) study, the psychometric properties of 8 tasks were assessed. One hundred and seventy-nine stable outpatients with schizophrenia and 104 healthy controls completed the battery at baseline and a 2-4-week retest period at 2 sites. Tasks included the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ), Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task (BLERT), Penn Emotion Recognition Task (ER-40), Relationships Across Domains (RAD), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (Eyes), The Awareness of Social Inferences Test (TASIT), Hinting Task, and Trustworthiness Task. Tasks were evaluated on: (i) test-retest reliability, (ii) utility as a repeated measure, (iii) relationship to functional outcome, (iv) practicality and tolerability, (v) sensitivity to group differences, and (vi) internal consistency. The BLERT and Hinting task showed the strongest psychometric properties across all evaluation criteria and are recommended for use in clinical trials. The ER-40, Eyes Task, and TASIT showed somewhat weaker psychometric properties and require further study. The AIHQ, RAD, and Trustworthiness Task showed poorer psychometric properties that suggest caution for their use in clinical trials.

KW - Emotion processing

KW - Measurement

KW - Mental state attribution

KW - Reliability

KW - Schizophrenia

KW - Social perception

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964885935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964885935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/schbul/sbv056

DO - 10.1093/schbul/sbv056

M3 - Article

C2 - 25943125

AN - SCOPUS:84964885935

VL - 42

SP - 494

EP - 504

JO - Schizophrenia Bulletin

JF - Schizophrenia Bulletin

SN - 0586-7614

IS - 2

ER -