Social carnivores outperform asocial carnivores on an innovative problem

Natalia Borrego, Michael Gaines

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The social intelligence hypothesis proposes that social complexity selects for cognitive complexity. However, the role of social complexity in the evolution of nonsocial cognition remains unresolved, resulting in disparate hypotheses. The domain-specific hypothesis posits that sociality only bolsters cognition associated with social challenges and contends that ecological complexity drives the evolution of nonsocial cognition. Alternatively, the domain-general hypothesis argues that the unmatched selective pressures of sociality favour greater cognitive flexibility and ultimately superior general cognition. We tested these hypotheses through experimental comparisons of nonsocial cognition in social and asocial carnivores: lions, Panthera leo, spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta, leopards, Panthera pardus, and tigers, Panthera tigris. We tested subjects using a technical task, a puzzle-box, designed to test innovation. Social species were more successful innovators than asocial species. We also observed a positive association between sociality, persistence and innovation; social species spent significantly more time engaged in the task, and persistent individuals were more successful in solving the task. Thus, our findings support the domain-general hypothesis; social carnivores outperformed asocial carnivores on an innovative problem.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-26
Number of pages6
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume114
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

cognition
carnivore
carnivores
Panthera leo
Panthera tigris
innovation
Panthera
Panthera pardus
persistence
testing
Crocuta crocuta

Keywords

  • Animal behaviour
  • Animal cognition
  • Innovation
  • Innovative problem solving
  • Social intelligence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Social carnivores outperform asocial carnivores on an innovative problem. / Borrego, Natalia; Gaines, Michael.

In: Animal Behaviour, Vol. 114, 01.04.2016, p. 21-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89c6b7cb12fc40b79a3cd4ba19cb7ab5,
title = "Social carnivores outperform asocial carnivores on an innovative problem",
abstract = "The social intelligence hypothesis proposes that social complexity selects for cognitive complexity. However, the role of social complexity in the evolution of nonsocial cognition remains unresolved, resulting in disparate hypotheses. The domain-specific hypothesis posits that sociality only bolsters cognition associated with social challenges and contends that ecological complexity drives the evolution of nonsocial cognition. Alternatively, the domain-general hypothesis argues that the unmatched selective pressures of sociality favour greater cognitive flexibility and ultimately superior general cognition. We tested these hypotheses through experimental comparisons of nonsocial cognition in social and asocial carnivores: lions, Panthera leo, spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta, leopards, Panthera pardus, and tigers, Panthera tigris. We tested subjects using a technical task, a puzzle-box, designed to test innovation. Social species were more successful innovators than asocial species. We also observed a positive association between sociality, persistence and innovation; social species spent significantly more time engaged in the task, and persistent individuals were more successful in solving the task. Thus, our findings support the domain-general hypothesis; social carnivores outperformed asocial carnivores on an innovative problem.",
keywords = "Animal behaviour, Animal cognition, Innovation, Innovative problem solving, Social intelligence",
author = "Natalia Borrego and Michael Gaines",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.01.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "21--26",
journal = "Animal Behaviour",
issn = "0003-3472",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social carnivores outperform asocial carnivores on an innovative problem

AU - Borrego, Natalia

AU - Gaines, Michael

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - The social intelligence hypothesis proposes that social complexity selects for cognitive complexity. However, the role of social complexity in the evolution of nonsocial cognition remains unresolved, resulting in disparate hypotheses. The domain-specific hypothesis posits that sociality only bolsters cognition associated with social challenges and contends that ecological complexity drives the evolution of nonsocial cognition. Alternatively, the domain-general hypothesis argues that the unmatched selective pressures of sociality favour greater cognitive flexibility and ultimately superior general cognition. We tested these hypotheses through experimental comparisons of nonsocial cognition in social and asocial carnivores: lions, Panthera leo, spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta, leopards, Panthera pardus, and tigers, Panthera tigris. We tested subjects using a technical task, a puzzle-box, designed to test innovation. Social species were more successful innovators than asocial species. We also observed a positive association between sociality, persistence and innovation; social species spent significantly more time engaged in the task, and persistent individuals were more successful in solving the task. Thus, our findings support the domain-general hypothesis; social carnivores outperformed asocial carnivores on an innovative problem.

AB - The social intelligence hypothesis proposes that social complexity selects for cognitive complexity. However, the role of social complexity in the evolution of nonsocial cognition remains unresolved, resulting in disparate hypotheses. The domain-specific hypothesis posits that sociality only bolsters cognition associated with social challenges and contends that ecological complexity drives the evolution of nonsocial cognition. Alternatively, the domain-general hypothesis argues that the unmatched selective pressures of sociality favour greater cognitive flexibility and ultimately superior general cognition. We tested these hypotheses through experimental comparisons of nonsocial cognition in social and asocial carnivores: lions, Panthera leo, spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta, leopards, Panthera pardus, and tigers, Panthera tigris. We tested subjects using a technical task, a puzzle-box, designed to test innovation. Social species were more successful innovators than asocial species. We also observed a positive association between sociality, persistence and innovation; social species spent significantly more time engaged in the task, and persistent individuals were more successful in solving the task. Thus, our findings support the domain-general hypothesis; social carnivores outperformed asocial carnivores on an innovative problem.

KW - Animal behaviour

KW - Animal cognition

KW - Innovation

KW - Innovative problem solving

KW - Social intelligence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958225374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958225374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.01.013

DO - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.01.013

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84958225374

VL - 114

SP - 21

EP - 26

JO - Animal Behaviour

JF - Animal Behaviour

SN - 0003-3472

ER -