Skeletal analysis and theoretical complications

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Archaeologists - feminist or otherwise - use biologically sexed human remains to make inferences about cultures' conceptions of gender. Creating an easy link between 'sex' and 'gender', however, is not without problems. Recent debates within the social sciences have centered on the evolving, historical definition and cultural relevance of both of these terms. Interestingly, skeletal analysts' voices tend to remain silent in this debate. What do paradigmatic twists and turns in feminist and queer theorizing mean for burial analysis? To answer this question, I advocate a bioarchaeological approach that facilitates reconciliation of biological classifications, cultural constructions of gender and feminist theories that complicate 'sex' and 'gender'. As an example, I look to the pre-Columbian Maya.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)597-609
Number of pages13
JournalWorld Archaeology
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

gender
reconciliation
funeral
social science
analysis
Complications
Skeletal Analysis

Keywords

  • Bioarchaeology
  • Feminist and queer theories
  • Gender/sex
  • Performance
  • Pre-Columbian Maya

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Archaeology

Cite this

Skeletal analysis and theoretical complications. / Geller, Pamela.

In: World Archaeology, Vol. 37, No. 4, 12.2005, p. 597-609.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7c2eec7833ab408b98a17dc6c5b7f6eb,
title = "Skeletal analysis and theoretical complications",
abstract = "Archaeologists - feminist or otherwise - use biologically sexed human remains to make inferences about cultures' conceptions of gender. Creating an easy link between 'sex' and 'gender', however, is not without problems. Recent debates within the social sciences have centered on the evolving, historical definition and cultural relevance of both of these terms. Interestingly, skeletal analysts' voices tend to remain silent in this debate. What do paradigmatic twists and turns in feminist and queer theorizing mean for burial analysis? To answer this question, I advocate a bioarchaeological approach that facilitates reconciliation of biological classifications, cultural constructions of gender and feminist theories that complicate 'sex' and 'gender'. As an example, I look to the pre-Columbian Maya.",
keywords = "Bioarchaeology, Feminist and queer theories, Gender/sex, Performance, Pre-Columbian Maya",
author = "Pamela Geller",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/00438240500404391",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "597--609",
journal = "World Archaeology",
issn = "0043-8243",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skeletal analysis and theoretical complications

AU - Geller, Pamela

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Archaeologists - feminist or otherwise - use biologically sexed human remains to make inferences about cultures' conceptions of gender. Creating an easy link between 'sex' and 'gender', however, is not without problems. Recent debates within the social sciences have centered on the evolving, historical definition and cultural relevance of both of these terms. Interestingly, skeletal analysts' voices tend to remain silent in this debate. What do paradigmatic twists and turns in feminist and queer theorizing mean for burial analysis? To answer this question, I advocate a bioarchaeological approach that facilitates reconciliation of biological classifications, cultural constructions of gender and feminist theories that complicate 'sex' and 'gender'. As an example, I look to the pre-Columbian Maya.

AB - Archaeologists - feminist or otherwise - use biologically sexed human remains to make inferences about cultures' conceptions of gender. Creating an easy link between 'sex' and 'gender', however, is not without problems. Recent debates within the social sciences have centered on the evolving, historical definition and cultural relevance of both of these terms. Interestingly, skeletal analysts' voices tend to remain silent in this debate. What do paradigmatic twists and turns in feminist and queer theorizing mean for burial analysis? To answer this question, I advocate a bioarchaeological approach that facilitates reconciliation of biological classifications, cultural constructions of gender and feminist theories that complicate 'sex' and 'gender'. As an example, I look to the pre-Columbian Maya.

KW - Bioarchaeology

KW - Feminist and queer theories

KW - Gender/sex

KW - Performance

KW - Pre-Columbian Maya

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31344460317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31344460317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00438240500404391

DO - 10.1080/00438240500404391

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:31344460317

VL - 37

SP - 597

EP - 609

JO - World Archaeology

JF - World Archaeology

SN - 0043-8243

IS - 4

ER -