Single Center Experience with the AngioVac Aspiration System

Jason Salsamendi, Mehul Doshi, Shivank Bhatia, Matthew Bordegaray, Rahul Arya, Connor Morton, Govindarajan Narayanan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The AngioVac catheter system is a mechanical suction device designed for removal of intravascular material using extracorporeal veno-venous bypass circuit. The purpose of this study is to present the outcomes in patients treated with the AngioVac aspiration system and to discuss its efficacy in different vascular beds. Materials and Methods: A retrospectively review was performed of seven patients treated with AngioVac between October 2013 and December 2014. In 6/7 cases, the AngioVac cannula was inserted percutaneously and the patient was placed on veno-venous bypass. In one of the cases, the cannula was inserted directly into the Fontan circuit after sternotomy and the patient was maintained on cardiopulmonary bypass. Thrombus location included iliocaval (2), SVC (1), pulmonary arteries (1), Fontan circuit and Glenn shunt with pulmonary artery extension (1), right atrium (1), and IVC with renal vein extension (1). Results: The majority of thrombus (50–95 %) was removed in 5/7 cases, and partial thrombus removal (<50 %) was confirmed in 2/7 cases. Mean follow-up was 205 days (range 64–403 days). All patients were alive at latest follow-up. Minor complications included three neck hematomas in two total patients. No major complications occurred. Conclusion: AngioVac is a useful tool for acute thrombus removal in the large vessels. The setup and substantial cost may limit its application in straightforward cases. More studies are needed to establish the utility of AngioVac in treatment of intravascular and intracardiac material.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)998-1004
Number of pages7
JournalCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 12 2015

Fingerprint

Thrombosis
Pulmonary Artery
Device Removal
Renal Veins
Sternotomy
Suction
Heart Atria
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Hematoma
Blood Vessels
Neck
Catheters
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cannula
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • AngioVac
  • Suction embolectomy
  • Vacuum-assisted thrombectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Single Center Experience with the AngioVac Aspiration System. / Salsamendi, Jason; Doshi, Mehul; Bhatia, Shivank; Bordegaray, Matthew; Arya, Rahul; Morton, Connor; Narayanan, Govindarajan.

In: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 38, No. 4, 12.06.2015, p. 998-1004.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Salsamendi, Jason ; Doshi, Mehul ; Bhatia, Shivank ; Bordegaray, Matthew ; Arya, Rahul ; Morton, Connor ; Narayanan, Govindarajan. / Single Center Experience with the AngioVac Aspiration System. In: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology. 2015 ; Vol. 38, No. 4. pp. 998-1004.
@article{d0d9bf6c94134130832902c15e8a93f8,
title = "Single Center Experience with the AngioVac Aspiration System",
abstract = "Purpose: The AngioVac catheter system is a mechanical suction device designed for removal of intravascular material using extracorporeal veno-venous bypass circuit. The purpose of this study is to present the outcomes in patients treated with the AngioVac aspiration system and to discuss its efficacy in different vascular beds. Materials and Methods: A retrospectively review was performed of seven patients treated with AngioVac between October 2013 and December 2014. In 6/7 cases, the AngioVac cannula was inserted percutaneously and the patient was placed on veno-venous bypass. In one of the cases, the cannula was inserted directly into the Fontan circuit after sternotomy and the patient was maintained on cardiopulmonary bypass. Thrombus location included iliocaval (2), SVC (1), pulmonary arteries (1), Fontan circuit and Glenn shunt with pulmonary artery extension (1), right atrium (1), and IVC with renal vein extension (1). Results: The majority of thrombus (50–95 {\%}) was removed in 5/7 cases, and partial thrombus removal (<50 {\%}) was confirmed in 2/7 cases. Mean follow-up was 205 days (range 64–403 days). All patients were alive at latest follow-up. Minor complications included three neck hematomas in two total patients. No major complications occurred. Conclusion: AngioVac is a useful tool for acute thrombus removal in the large vessels. The setup and substantial cost may limit its application in straightforward cases. More studies are needed to establish the utility of AngioVac in treatment of intravascular and intracardiac material.",
keywords = "AngioVac, Suction embolectomy, Vacuum-assisted thrombectomy",
author = "Jason Salsamendi and Mehul Doshi and Shivank Bhatia and Matthew Bordegaray and Rahul Arya and Connor Morton and Govindarajan Narayanan",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s00270-015-1152-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "998--1004",
journal = "CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology",
issn = "7415-5101",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single Center Experience with the AngioVac Aspiration System

AU - Salsamendi, Jason

AU - Doshi, Mehul

AU - Bhatia, Shivank

AU - Bordegaray, Matthew

AU - Arya, Rahul

AU - Morton, Connor

AU - Narayanan, Govindarajan

PY - 2015/6/12

Y1 - 2015/6/12

N2 - Purpose: The AngioVac catheter system is a mechanical suction device designed for removal of intravascular material using extracorporeal veno-venous bypass circuit. The purpose of this study is to present the outcomes in patients treated with the AngioVac aspiration system and to discuss its efficacy in different vascular beds. Materials and Methods: A retrospectively review was performed of seven patients treated with AngioVac between October 2013 and December 2014. In 6/7 cases, the AngioVac cannula was inserted percutaneously and the patient was placed on veno-venous bypass. In one of the cases, the cannula was inserted directly into the Fontan circuit after sternotomy and the patient was maintained on cardiopulmonary bypass. Thrombus location included iliocaval (2), SVC (1), pulmonary arteries (1), Fontan circuit and Glenn shunt with pulmonary artery extension (1), right atrium (1), and IVC with renal vein extension (1). Results: The majority of thrombus (50–95 %) was removed in 5/7 cases, and partial thrombus removal (<50 %) was confirmed in 2/7 cases. Mean follow-up was 205 days (range 64–403 days). All patients were alive at latest follow-up. Minor complications included three neck hematomas in two total patients. No major complications occurred. Conclusion: AngioVac is a useful tool for acute thrombus removal in the large vessels. The setup and substantial cost may limit its application in straightforward cases. More studies are needed to establish the utility of AngioVac in treatment of intravascular and intracardiac material.

AB - Purpose: The AngioVac catheter system is a mechanical suction device designed for removal of intravascular material using extracorporeal veno-venous bypass circuit. The purpose of this study is to present the outcomes in patients treated with the AngioVac aspiration system and to discuss its efficacy in different vascular beds. Materials and Methods: A retrospectively review was performed of seven patients treated with AngioVac between October 2013 and December 2014. In 6/7 cases, the AngioVac cannula was inserted percutaneously and the patient was placed on veno-venous bypass. In one of the cases, the cannula was inserted directly into the Fontan circuit after sternotomy and the patient was maintained on cardiopulmonary bypass. Thrombus location included iliocaval (2), SVC (1), pulmonary arteries (1), Fontan circuit and Glenn shunt with pulmonary artery extension (1), right atrium (1), and IVC with renal vein extension (1). Results: The majority of thrombus (50–95 %) was removed in 5/7 cases, and partial thrombus removal (<50 %) was confirmed in 2/7 cases. Mean follow-up was 205 days (range 64–403 days). All patients were alive at latest follow-up. Minor complications included three neck hematomas in two total patients. No major complications occurred. Conclusion: AngioVac is a useful tool for acute thrombus removal in the large vessels. The setup and substantial cost may limit its application in straightforward cases. More studies are needed to establish the utility of AngioVac in treatment of intravascular and intracardiac material.

KW - AngioVac

KW - Suction embolectomy

KW - Vacuum-assisted thrombectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937514621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937514621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00270-015-1152-x

DO - 10.1007/s00270-015-1152-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 26067804

AN - SCOPUS:84937514621

VL - 38

SP - 998

EP - 1004

JO - CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

JF - CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

SN - 7415-5101

IS - 4

ER -