Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention

Results of a randomized, controlled study

Rabih A. Chaer, Brian G. DeRubertis, Stephanie C. Lin, Harry L. Bush, John K Karwowski, Daniel Birk, Nicholas J. Morrissey, Peter L. Faries, James F. McKinsey, K. Craig Kent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

178 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Surgical simulation has been shown to enhance the training of general surgery residents. Since catheter-based techniques have become an important part of the vascular surgeon's armamentarium, we explored whether simulation might impact the acquisition of catheter skills by surgical residents. METHODS: Twenty general surgery residents received didactic training in the techniques of catheter intervention. Residents were then randomized with 10 receiving additional training with the Procedicus, computer-based, haptic simulator. All 20 residents then participated in 2 consecutive mentored catheter-based interventions for lower extremity occlusive disease in an OR/angiography suite. Resident performance was graded by attending surgeons blinded to the resident's training status, using 18 procedural steps as well as a global rating scale. RESULTS: There were no differences between the 2 resident groups with regard to demographics or scores on a visuospatial test administered at study outset. Overall, residents exposed to simulation scored higher than controls during the first angio/OR intervention: procedural steps (simulation/control) (50 ± 6 vs. 33 ± 9, P = 0.0015); global rating scale (30 ± 7 vs. 19 ± 5, P = 0.0052). The advantage provided by simulator training persisted with the second intervention (53 ± 6 vs. 36 ± 7, P = 0.0006); global rating scale (33 ± 6 vs. 21 ± 6, P = 0.0015). Moreover, simulation training, particularly for the second intervention, led to enhancement in almost all of the individual measures of performance. CONCLUSION: Simulation is a valid tool for instructing surgical residents and fellows in basic endovascular techniques and should be incorporated into surgical training programs. Moreover, simulators may also benefit the large number of vascular surgeons who seek retraining in catheter-based intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-349
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume244
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Catheters
Blood Vessels
Endovascular Procedures
Lower Extremity
Angiography
Teaching
Demography
Education
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Chaer, R. A., DeRubertis, B. G., Lin, S. C., Bush, H. L., Karwowski, J. K., Birk, D., ... Kent, K. C. (2006). Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention: Results of a randomized, controlled study. Annals of Surgery, 244(3), 343-349. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000234932.88487.75

Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention : Results of a randomized, controlled study. / Chaer, Rabih A.; DeRubertis, Brian G.; Lin, Stephanie C.; Bush, Harry L.; Karwowski, John K; Birk, Daniel; Morrissey, Nicholas J.; Faries, Peter L.; McKinsey, James F.; Kent, K. Craig.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 244, No. 3, 09.2006, p. 343-349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chaer, RA, DeRubertis, BG, Lin, SC, Bush, HL, Karwowski, JK, Birk, D, Morrissey, NJ, Faries, PL, McKinsey, JF & Kent, KC 2006, 'Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention: Results of a randomized, controlled study', Annals of Surgery, vol. 244, no. 3, pp. 343-349. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000234932.88487.75
Chaer, Rabih A. ; DeRubertis, Brian G. ; Lin, Stephanie C. ; Bush, Harry L. ; Karwowski, John K ; Birk, Daniel ; Morrissey, Nicholas J. ; Faries, Peter L. ; McKinsey, James F. ; Kent, K. Craig. / Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention : Results of a randomized, controlled study. In: Annals of Surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 244, No. 3. pp. 343-349.
@article{15eb4feb81e84e7585099249f75f6fe3,
title = "Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention: Results of a randomized, controlled study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Surgical simulation has been shown to enhance the training of general surgery residents. Since catheter-based techniques have become an important part of the vascular surgeon's armamentarium, we explored whether simulation might impact the acquisition of catheter skills by surgical residents. METHODS: Twenty general surgery residents received didactic training in the techniques of catheter intervention. Residents were then randomized with 10 receiving additional training with the Procedicus, computer-based, haptic simulator. All 20 residents then participated in 2 consecutive mentored catheter-based interventions for lower extremity occlusive disease in an OR/angiography suite. Resident performance was graded by attending surgeons blinded to the resident's training status, using 18 procedural steps as well as a global rating scale. RESULTS: There were no differences between the 2 resident groups with regard to demographics or scores on a visuospatial test administered at study outset. Overall, residents exposed to simulation scored higher than controls during the first angio/OR intervention: procedural steps (simulation/control) (50 ± 6 vs. 33 ± 9, P = 0.0015); global rating scale (30 ± 7 vs. 19 ± 5, P = 0.0052). The advantage provided by simulator training persisted with the second intervention (53 ± 6 vs. 36 ± 7, P = 0.0006); global rating scale (33 ± 6 vs. 21 ± 6, P = 0.0015). Moreover, simulation training, particularly for the second intervention, led to enhancement in almost all of the individual measures of performance. CONCLUSION: Simulation is a valid tool for instructing surgical residents and fellows in basic endovascular techniques and should be incorporated into surgical training programs. Moreover, simulators may also benefit the large number of vascular surgeons who seek retraining in catheter-based intervention.",
author = "Chaer, {Rabih A.} and DeRubertis, {Brian G.} and Lin, {Stephanie C.} and Bush, {Harry L.} and Karwowski, {John K} and Daniel Birk and Morrissey, {Nicholas J.} and Faries, {Peter L.} and McKinsey, {James F.} and Kent, {K. Craig}",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/01.sla.0000234932.88487.75",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "244",
pages = "343--349",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simulation improves resident performance in catheter-based intervention

T2 - Results of a randomized, controlled study

AU - Chaer, Rabih A.

AU - DeRubertis, Brian G.

AU - Lin, Stephanie C.

AU - Bush, Harry L.

AU - Karwowski, John K

AU - Birk, Daniel

AU - Morrissey, Nicholas J.

AU - Faries, Peter L.

AU - McKinsey, James F.

AU - Kent, K. Craig

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Surgical simulation has been shown to enhance the training of general surgery residents. Since catheter-based techniques have become an important part of the vascular surgeon's armamentarium, we explored whether simulation might impact the acquisition of catheter skills by surgical residents. METHODS: Twenty general surgery residents received didactic training in the techniques of catheter intervention. Residents were then randomized with 10 receiving additional training with the Procedicus, computer-based, haptic simulator. All 20 residents then participated in 2 consecutive mentored catheter-based interventions for lower extremity occlusive disease in an OR/angiography suite. Resident performance was graded by attending surgeons blinded to the resident's training status, using 18 procedural steps as well as a global rating scale. RESULTS: There were no differences between the 2 resident groups with regard to demographics or scores on a visuospatial test administered at study outset. Overall, residents exposed to simulation scored higher than controls during the first angio/OR intervention: procedural steps (simulation/control) (50 ± 6 vs. 33 ± 9, P = 0.0015); global rating scale (30 ± 7 vs. 19 ± 5, P = 0.0052). The advantage provided by simulator training persisted with the second intervention (53 ± 6 vs. 36 ± 7, P = 0.0006); global rating scale (33 ± 6 vs. 21 ± 6, P = 0.0015). Moreover, simulation training, particularly for the second intervention, led to enhancement in almost all of the individual measures of performance. CONCLUSION: Simulation is a valid tool for instructing surgical residents and fellows in basic endovascular techniques and should be incorporated into surgical training programs. Moreover, simulators may also benefit the large number of vascular surgeons who seek retraining in catheter-based intervention.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Surgical simulation has been shown to enhance the training of general surgery residents. Since catheter-based techniques have become an important part of the vascular surgeon's armamentarium, we explored whether simulation might impact the acquisition of catheter skills by surgical residents. METHODS: Twenty general surgery residents received didactic training in the techniques of catheter intervention. Residents were then randomized with 10 receiving additional training with the Procedicus, computer-based, haptic simulator. All 20 residents then participated in 2 consecutive mentored catheter-based interventions for lower extremity occlusive disease in an OR/angiography suite. Resident performance was graded by attending surgeons blinded to the resident's training status, using 18 procedural steps as well as a global rating scale. RESULTS: There were no differences between the 2 resident groups with regard to demographics or scores on a visuospatial test administered at study outset. Overall, residents exposed to simulation scored higher than controls during the first angio/OR intervention: procedural steps (simulation/control) (50 ± 6 vs. 33 ± 9, P = 0.0015); global rating scale (30 ± 7 vs. 19 ± 5, P = 0.0052). The advantage provided by simulator training persisted with the second intervention (53 ± 6 vs. 36 ± 7, P = 0.0006); global rating scale (33 ± 6 vs. 21 ± 6, P = 0.0015). Moreover, simulation training, particularly for the second intervention, led to enhancement in almost all of the individual measures of performance. CONCLUSION: Simulation is a valid tool for instructing surgical residents and fellows in basic endovascular techniques and should be incorporated into surgical training programs. Moreover, simulators may also benefit the large number of vascular surgeons who seek retraining in catheter-based intervention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747740693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747740693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.sla.0000234932.88487.75

DO - 10.1097/01.sla.0000234932.88487.75

M3 - Article

VL - 244

SP - 343

EP - 349

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 3

ER -