Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although use of simulation-based team training for pediatric trauma resuscitation has increased, its impact on patient outcomes has not yet been shown. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between simulation use and patient outcomes. METHODS: Trauma centers that participate in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) were surveyed to determine frequency of simulation use in 2014 and 2015. Center-specific clinical data for 2016 and 2017 were abstracted from the ACS TQIP registry (n = 57,916 patients) and linked to survey responses. Center-specific risk-adjusted mortality was estimated using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression and compared across four levels of simulation-based training use: no training, low-volume training, high-volume training, and survey nonresponders (unknown training use). RESULTS: Survey response rate was 75% (94/125 centers) with 78% of the responding centers (73/94) reporting simulation use. The average risk-adjusted odds of mortality was lower in centers with a high volume of training compared with centers not using simulation (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.92). The times required for resuscitation processes, evaluations, and critical procedures (endotracheal intubation, head computed tomography, craniotomy, and surgery for hemorrhage control) were not different between centers based on levels of simulation use. CONCLUSION: Risk-adjusted mortality is lower in TQIP-Pediatric centers using simulation-based training, but this improvement in mortality may not be mediated by a reduction in time to critical procedures. Further investigation into alternative mediators of improved mortality associated with simulation use is warranted, including assessment of resuscitation quality, improved communication, enhanced teamwork skills, and decreased errors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, Level III.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 841-848 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | The journal of trauma and acute care surgery |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 1 2019 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Cite this
Simulation-based training is associated with lower risk-adjusted mortality in ACS pediatric TQIP centers. / Jensen, Aaron R.; McLaughlin, Cory; Subacius, Haris; McAuliff, Katie; Nathens, Avery B.; Wong, Carolyn; Meeker, Daniella; Burd, Randall S.; Ford, Henri R.; Upperman, Jeffrey S.
In: The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, Vol. 87, No. 4, 01.10.2019, p. 841-848.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Simulation-based training is associated with lower risk-adjusted mortality in ACS pediatric TQIP centers
AU - Jensen, Aaron R.
AU - McLaughlin, Cory
AU - Subacius, Haris
AU - McAuliff, Katie
AU - Nathens, Avery B.
AU - Wong, Carolyn
AU - Meeker, Daniella
AU - Burd, Randall S.
AU - Ford, Henri R.
AU - Upperman, Jeffrey S.
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Although use of simulation-based team training for pediatric trauma resuscitation has increased, its impact on patient outcomes has not yet been shown. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between simulation use and patient outcomes. METHODS: Trauma centers that participate in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) were surveyed to determine frequency of simulation use in 2014 and 2015. Center-specific clinical data for 2016 and 2017 were abstracted from the ACS TQIP registry (n = 57,916 patients) and linked to survey responses. Center-specific risk-adjusted mortality was estimated using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression and compared across four levels of simulation-based training use: no training, low-volume training, high-volume training, and survey nonresponders (unknown training use). RESULTS: Survey response rate was 75% (94/125 centers) with 78% of the responding centers (73/94) reporting simulation use. The average risk-adjusted odds of mortality was lower in centers with a high volume of training compared with centers not using simulation (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.92). The times required for resuscitation processes, evaluations, and critical procedures (endotracheal intubation, head computed tomography, craniotomy, and surgery for hemorrhage control) were not different between centers based on levels of simulation use. CONCLUSION: Risk-adjusted mortality is lower in TQIP-Pediatric centers using simulation-based training, but this improvement in mortality may not be mediated by a reduction in time to critical procedures. Further investigation into alternative mediators of improved mortality associated with simulation use is warranted, including assessment of resuscitation quality, improved communication, enhanced teamwork skills, and decreased errors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, Level III.
AB - BACKGROUND: Although use of simulation-based team training for pediatric trauma resuscitation has increased, its impact on patient outcomes has not yet been shown. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between simulation use and patient outcomes. METHODS: Trauma centers that participate in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) were surveyed to determine frequency of simulation use in 2014 and 2015. Center-specific clinical data for 2016 and 2017 were abstracted from the ACS TQIP registry (n = 57,916 patients) and linked to survey responses. Center-specific risk-adjusted mortality was estimated using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression and compared across four levels of simulation-based training use: no training, low-volume training, high-volume training, and survey nonresponders (unknown training use). RESULTS: Survey response rate was 75% (94/125 centers) with 78% of the responding centers (73/94) reporting simulation use. The average risk-adjusted odds of mortality was lower in centers with a high volume of training compared with centers not using simulation (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.92). The times required for resuscitation processes, evaluations, and critical procedures (endotracheal intubation, head computed tomography, craniotomy, and surgery for hemorrhage control) were not different between centers based on levels of simulation use. CONCLUSION: Risk-adjusted mortality is lower in TQIP-Pediatric centers using simulation-based training, but this improvement in mortality may not be mediated by a reduction in time to critical procedures. Further investigation into alternative mediators of improved mortality associated with simulation use is warranted, including assessment of resuscitation quality, improved communication, enhanced teamwork skills, and decreased errors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, Level III.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072927494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072927494&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000002433
DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000002433
M3 - Article
C2 - 31589193
AN - SCOPUS:85072927494
VL - 87
SP - 841
EP - 848
JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
SN - 2163-0755
IS - 4
ER -