Significance of accidental extensions in the lower uterine segment during cesarean delivery

Lesley de la Torre, Víctor Hugo González-Quintero, Kathleen Mayor-Lynn, Loren Smarkusky, M. Camille Hoffman, Amanda Saab, Makbib Diro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: This study was undertaken to determine risk factors and perioperative complications associated with accidental extensions in the lower uterine segment during cesarean deliveries (CDs). Study design: This is a retrospective chart review of all CDs performed at Jackson Memorial Hospital/University of Miami between the years 1999 and 2002. Operative reports were reviewed to abstract data on the occurrence of extensions. Indication for CD, cervical status at the time of CD, birth weight, and fetal presentation and position were included in the analyses. Postoperative hematocrits, length of surgery, estimated blood loss, decline in hematocrit by 10%, need for transfusion, or hysterectomy were compared among CD with and without extensions. Results: A total of 2,811 CDs were available for this study. Accidental extensions in the lower uterine segment occurred in 6.6% of the cases. Extensions were more commonly found in primary CD (8% vs 5%, P < .01. Extensions were more frequent if cervical dilatation was 8 cm or greater (18.3% vs 7%, P < .01), complete effacement (15% vs 8%, P < .01) station greater than +1 (16% vs 6.9%, P < .01), and if the fetal position was noted to be in the occiput posterior position (10% vs 5%, P < .01). When extensions were present, length of surgery was longer (56 vs 49 minutes, P < .01) and estimated blood loss was greater (994 ± 675 mL vs 936 ± 370 mL, P < .01). Arrest of descent as indication for CD was found to be an independent risk factor for the occurrence of extensions during CD (odds ratio 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.5, P = .001). Conclusion: Extensions in the lower uterine segment during CD do not increase maternal morbidity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e4-e6
JournalAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Volume194
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2006

Keywords

  • Cesarean delivery
  • Maternal morbidity
  • Perioperative complications
  • Risk factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Significance of accidental extensions in the lower uterine segment during cesarean delivery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    de la Torre, L., González-Quintero, V. H., Mayor-Lynn, K., Smarkusky, L., Hoffman, M. C., Saab, A., & Diro, M. (2006). Significance of accidental extensions in the lower uterine segment during cesarean delivery. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 194(5), e4-e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.026