Short seller influence on firm growth

A threat rigidity perspective

Wei Shi, Brian L. Connelly, Kubilay Cirik

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whereas most investors seek to maximize their investment, there are some who profit from downward stock price movement. Engaging in such behavior is called “short selling,” and it has increased considerably among publicly traded North American firms in recent years. This study builds on threat rigidity theory to develop arguments about the behavioral consequences of short sellers. We theorize that, when firms have a high level of short interest, managers adopt a defensive stance by halting new growth initiatives and limiting the range of growth modes in which they participate. We also suggest that managers’ ability to process information and exercise control moderate these main effects. Specifically, we argue that managers will be less reactionary when firms have high absorptive capacity, possess high board centrality, maintain sufficient financial slack, and are well regarded by the media. Results largely support our theory, as we show that short sellers can have a profoundly deleterious effect on firm growth prospects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1892-1919
Number of pages28
JournalAcademy of Management Journal
Volume61
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Rigidity
Managers
Profitability
Sales
Threat
Seller
Firm growth
Short interest
Stock prices
Support theory
Centrality
Investors
Short selling
Profit
Exercise
Absorptive capacity
Financial slack

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Short seller influence on firm growth : A threat rigidity perspective. / Shi, Wei; Connelly, Brian L.; Cirik, Kubilay.

In: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 61, No. 5, 01.10.2018, p. 1892-1919.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Shi, Wei ; Connelly, Brian L. ; Cirik, Kubilay. / Short seller influence on firm growth : A threat rigidity perspective. In: Academy of Management Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 61, No. 5. pp. 1892-1919.
@article{6fdf766703764b559921ce56adfb4e8b,
title = "Short seller influence on firm growth: A threat rigidity perspective",
abstract = "Whereas most investors seek to maximize their investment, there are some who profit from downward stock price movement. Engaging in such behavior is called “short selling,” and it has increased considerably among publicly traded North American firms in recent years. This study builds on threat rigidity theory to develop arguments about the behavioral consequences of short sellers. We theorize that, when firms have a high level of short interest, managers adopt a defensive stance by halting new growth initiatives and limiting the range of growth modes in which they participate. We also suggest that managers’ ability to process information and exercise control moderate these main effects. Specifically, we argue that managers will be less reactionary when firms have high absorptive capacity, possess high board centrality, maintain sufficient financial slack, and are well regarded by the media. Results largely support our theory, as we show that short sellers can have a profoundly deleterious effect on firm growth prospects.",
author = "Wei Shi and Connelly, {Brian L.} and Kubilay Cirik",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/amj.2016.1010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "1892--1919",
journal = "Academy of Management Journal",
issn = "0001-4273",
publisher = "Academy of Management",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Short seller influence on firm growth

T2 - A threat rigidity perspective

AU - Shi, Wei

AU - Connelly, Brian L.

AU - Cirik, Kubilay

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Whereas most investors seek to maximize their investment, there are some who profit from downward stock price movement. Engaging in such behavior is called “short selling,” and it has increased considerably among publicly traded North American firms in recent years. This study builds on threat rigidity theory to develop arguments about the behavioral consequences of short sellers. We theorize that, when firms have a high level of short interest, managers adopt a defensive stance by halting new growth initiatives and limiting the range of growth modes in which they participate. We also suggest that managers’ ability to process information and exercise control moderate these main effects. Specifically, we argue that managers will be less reactionary when firms have high absorptive capacity, possess high board centrality, maintain sufficient financial slack, and are well regarded by the media. Results largely support our theory, as we show that short sellers can have a profoundly deleterious effect on firm growth prospects.

AB - Whereas most investors seek to maximize their investment, there are some who profit from downward stock price movement. Engaging in such behavior is called “short selling,” and it has increased considerably among publicly traded North American firms in recent years. This study builds on threat rigidity theory to develop arguments about the behavioral consequences of short sellers. We theorize that, when firms have a high level of short interest, managers adopt a defensive stance by halting new growth initiatives and limiting the range of growth modes in which they participate. We also suggest that managers’ ability to process information and exercise control moderate these main effects. Specifically, we argue that managers will be less reactionary when firms have high absorptive capacity, possess high board centrality, maintain sufficient financial slack, and are well regarded by the media. Results largely support our theory, as we show that short sellers can have a profoundly deleterious effect on firm growth prospects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055765344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055765344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5465/amj.2016.1010

DO - 10.5465/amj.2016.1010

M3 - Review article

VL - 61

SP - 1892

EP - 1919

JO - Academy of Management Journal

JF - Academy of Management Journal

SN - 0001-4273

IS - 5

ER -